China Conch Venture Holdings Limited
China Conch Venture Holdings Limited CCVTF Peers
See (CCVTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCVTF | $1.17 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 7.31 | $0.16 | +3.72% |
| KTWIF | $39.45 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 31.81 | $1.24 | +1.58% |
| KTWIY | $78.07 | -0.64% | 4.4B | 31.61 | $2.47 | N/A |
| UMICF | $16.74 | +7.18% | 4B | -2.35 | -$7.13 | +3.35% |
| UMICY | $4.16 | +0.12% | 4B | -2.34 | -$1.78 | +3.53% |
| MMNNF | $16.50 | +0.00% | 3B | 30.56 | $0.54 | +0.50% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 16.78 | $3.16 | +1.86% |
| HIZOF | $6.72 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 7.38 | $0.91 | +0.02% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | +0.00% | 701.5M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
| MTWTF | $12.32 | +0.00% | 537.4M | 13.68 | $0.90 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
CCVTF vs KTWIF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while KTWIF trades at $39.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs KTWIY Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while KTWIY trades at $78.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs UMICF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while UMICF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to UMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs UMICY Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while UMICY trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs MMNNF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while MMNNF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ORGJF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs HIZOF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while HIZOF trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs TKUMF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to TKUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs MTWTF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to MTWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs PVARF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while PVARF trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GRPRF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GRPRF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ACTHF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to ACTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SREMF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SREMF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs MEEC Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SSHPF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs EMFGF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while EMFGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ATGVF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ATGVF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs BIRMF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while BIRMF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs YEWTF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs TMGEF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while TMGEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs AKCCF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while AKCCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs INTWF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while INTWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to INTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs BNET Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while BNET trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GRNWF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs DOCKF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while DOCKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs EESH Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while EESH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs DNDDF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GOGR Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GOGR trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs QUTIF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while QUTIF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to QUTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs AETLF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to AETLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs QWTR Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while QWTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs COSLF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs RAKR Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while RAKR trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs DRFS Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to DRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ENPRF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs DCTIF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while DCTIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SCAXF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SCAXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs KNOS Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs MGON Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs OWUV Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ATMFF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 898.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ATMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs EAWD Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 553.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs TGTMF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 468.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs LQWC Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 434.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SFBE Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFBE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to SFBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GWTR Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 343.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GMEV Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs TNKE Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to TNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs PCTL Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to PCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ESFS Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs WTII Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 61.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs MSBN Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GLEC Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GLEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs AKMYF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs XLPI Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to XLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ETII Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to ETII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs PGTK Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while PGTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs WTNW Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to WTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SINX Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GCHK Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs UVFT Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to UVFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs PURA Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SMVS Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to SMVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs GRCO Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to GRCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs CGYV Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to CGYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs ROBXF Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs SYEV Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 5.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs EMHI Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to EMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs RENO Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to RENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs EAUI Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to EAUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs MPML Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is more volatile compared to MPML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs HTHL Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.
CCVTF vs FQCC Comparison
CCVTF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCVTF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, CCVTF is priced at $1.17, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCVTF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCVTF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCVTF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCVTF.