Crossword Cybersecurity Plc
Crossword Cybersecurity Plc CCS.L Peers
See (CCS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCS.L | £1.75 | -5.41% | 2M | -0.44 | -£0.04 | N/A |
| 0YP5.L | £1,657.00 | +0.50% | 51.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KSPI.IL | £122.85 | +1.87% | 23.6B | 15.83 | £7.76 | N/A |
| KSPI.L | £43.35 | -1.46% | 15.6B | 4.48 | £9.67 | N/A |
| DARK.L | £576.80 | +0.07% | 3.7B | 44.37 | £0.13 | N/A |
| 0RUL.L | £27.95 | +1.35% | 2.1B | 22.78 | £1.23 | N/A |
| MCRO.L | £532.00 | +0.11% | 1.8B | -0.01 | -£640.20 | N/A |
| KAPE.L | £285.00 | +0.71% | 1.2B | 19.00 | £0.15 | N/A |
| BYIT.L | £500.50 | -0.99% | 1.2B | 22.75 | £0.22 | +0.62% |
| SPT.L | £192.40 | -0.10% | 1.1B | 96.20 | £0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCS.L vs 0YP5.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, 0YP5.L has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while 0YP5.L trades at £1,657.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas 0YP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to 0YP5.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to 0YP5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs KSPI.IL Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, KSPI.IL has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while KSPI.IL trades at £122.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas KSPI.IL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to KSPI.IL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and KSPI.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs KSPI.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, KSPI.L has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while KSPI.L trades at £43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas KSPI.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to KSPI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to KSPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs DARK.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, DARK.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while DARK.L trades at £576.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas DARK.L's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DARK.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and DARK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs 0RUL.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, 0RUL.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while 0RUL.L trades at £27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas 0RUL.L's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to 0RUL.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to 0RUL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs MCRO.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, MCRO.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while MCRO.L trades at £532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MCRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MCRO.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and MCRO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs KAPE.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, KAPE.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while KAPE.L trades at £285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas KAPE.L's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to KAPE.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and KAPE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs BYIT.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, BYIT.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while BYIT.L trades at £500.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BYIT.L's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BYIT.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to BYIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs SPT.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, SPT.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while SPT.L trades at £192.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SPT.L's P/E ratio is 96.20. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SPT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to SPT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs WPS.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, WPS.L has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while WPS.L trades at £89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas WPS.L's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to WPS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to WPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs PAY.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, PAY.L has a market cap of 587.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while PAY.L trades at £836.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PAY.L's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PAY.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to PAY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs BOKU.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, BOKU.L has a market cap of 558.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while BOKU.L trades at £188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BOKU.L's P/E ratio is 188.50. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BOKU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to BOKU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs FNX.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, FNX.L has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while FNX.L trades at £222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FNX.L's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FNX.L's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to FNX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs WNWD.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, WNWD.L has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while WNWD.L trades at £210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas WNWD.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to WNWD.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to WNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs BLTG.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, BLTG.L has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while BLTG.L trades at £225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BLTG.L's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BLTG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and BLTG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CCS.L vs BKS.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, BKS.L has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while BKS.L trades at £223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BKS.L's P/E ratio is 74.33. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BKS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to BKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs SEE.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, SEE.L has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while SEE.L trades at £2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SEE.L's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SEE.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to SEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs CNS.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, CNS.L has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while CNS.L trades at £14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CNS.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CNS.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to CNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs BGO.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, BGO.L has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while BGO.L trades at £91.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BGO.L's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BGO.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to BGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs PCIP.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, PCIP.L has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while PCIP.L trades at £51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PCIP.L's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PCIP.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and PCIP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs IOM.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, IOM.L has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while IOM.L trades at £29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas IOM.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to IOM.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to IOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs INSG.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, INSG.L has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while INSG.L trades at £27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas INSG.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to INSG.L's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to INSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs FIN.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, FIN.L has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while FIN.L trades at £32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FIN.L's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FIN.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to FIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs SYS.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, SYS.L has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while SYS.L trades at £21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SYS.L's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SYS.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and SYS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs CYK.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, CYK.L has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while CYK.L trades at £3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CYK.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CYK.L's ROE of -15.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to CYK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs GLAN.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, GLAN.L has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while GLAN.L trades at £33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas GLAN.L's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GLAN.L's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and GLAN.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs SWG.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, SWG.L has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while SWG.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SWG.L's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SWG.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to SWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs BRSD.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, BRSD.L has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while BRSD.L trades at £3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BRSD.L's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BRSD.L's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and BRSD.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CCS.L vs ECSC.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, ECSC.L has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while ECSC.L trades at £51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ECSC.L's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ECSC.L's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to ECSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs CTAI.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, CTAI.L has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while CTAI.L trades at £0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CTAI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CTAI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to CTAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs OSI.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, OSI.L has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while OSI.L trades at £2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas OSI.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to OSI.L's ROE of +23.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and OSI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs CLCO.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, CLCO.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while CLCO.L trades at £0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CLCO.L's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CLCO.L's ROE of +5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to CLCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs RCGH.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, RCGH.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while RCGH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas RCGH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RCGH.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to RCGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs MODE.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, MODE.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while MODE.L trades at £1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MODE.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MODE.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and MODE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs FCS.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, FCS.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while FCS.L trades at £20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FCS.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and FCS.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CCS.L vs CTEA.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, CTEA.L has a market cap of 407.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while CTEA.L trades at £0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CTEA.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CTEA.L's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to CTEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs EQN.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, EQN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while EQN.L trades at £179.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas EQN.L's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to EQN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to EQN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs WJA.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, WJA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while WJA.L trades at £7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas WJA.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to WJA.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and WJA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs PRSM.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, PRSM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while PRSM.L trades at £1,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PRSM.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PRSM.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to PRSM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs AVST.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, AVST.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while AVST.L trades at £716.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AVST.L's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AVST.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to AVST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs MMX.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, MMX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while MMX.L trades at £8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MMX.L's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MMX.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to MMX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs FLX.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, FLX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while FLX.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FLX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FLX.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and FLX.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CCS.L vs CALL.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, CALL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while CALL.L trades at £79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CALL.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L and CALL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCS.L vs SUMO.L Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, SUMO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while SUMO.L trades at £512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SUMO.L's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SUMO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to SUMO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.
CCS.L vs SFTL.IL Comparison
CCS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS.L stands at 2M. In comparison, SFTL.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS.L is priced at £1.75, while SFTL.IL trades at £1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SFTL.IL's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CCS.L's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SFTL.IL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS.L is less volatile compared to SFTL.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.L.