Capcom Co., Ltd.
Capcom Co., Ltd. CCOEF Peers
See (CCOEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCOEF | $27.18 | +7.21% | 11.4B | 33.97 | $0.80 | +1.00% |
| NTDOF | $82.88 | +0.69% | 96.5B | 49.93 | $1.66 | +1.23% |
| NTDOY | $20.68 | -1.43% | 96.3B | 49.24 | $0.42 | +0.28% |
| NETTF | $25.18 | +6.24% | 80.1B | 17.99 | $1.40 | +2.20% |
| KONMY | $68.95 | +1.40% | 18.7B | 35.91 | $1.92 | +0.19% |
| NEXOY | $17.92 | -1.73% | 14.5B | 17.07 | $1.05 | +0.00% |
| NEXOF | $17.40 | +10.83% | 14.1B | 16.57 | $1.05 | +0.01% |
| CCOEY | $14.95 | -1.19% | 12.5B | 37.37 | $0.40 | +0.39% |
| BLBLF | $18.77 | +3.70% | 7.8B | -93.85 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| SQNXF | $63.00 | +8.19% | 7.6B | 44.06 | $1.43 | +1.07% |
Stock Comparison
CCOEF vs NTDOF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NTDOF trades at $82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NTDOY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NTDOY trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NETTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NETTF trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KONMY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while KONMY trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NEXOY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NEXOY trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NEXOF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NEXOF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs CCOEY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while CCOEY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BLBLF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while BLBLF trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -93.85. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SQNXF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SQNXF trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SQNNY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SQNNY trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs OTGLF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while OTGLF trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs OTGLY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while OTGLY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 58.97. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KSFTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SGAMY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SGAMY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BCDMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SGAMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SGAMF trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KYYWF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs THQQF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while THQQF trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs PRXXF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while PRXXF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs DNACF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while DNACF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs MIXIF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while MIXIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs UBSFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while UBSFF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs UBSFY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while UBSFY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KYYWY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs XDNCF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GREZF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GUNGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GUNGF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs RVTTY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IGGGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 545.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs TSVNF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs STLFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 427M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while STLFF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BOYAF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while BOYAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BLITF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while BLITF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SCFR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SCFR trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs RMDEF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while RMDEF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -225.22. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs AKAFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs FRRDF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ENADF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while ENADF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs FGRTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GENTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GENTF trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs PONGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while PONGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IDGAF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs POPRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs EAGRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while EAGRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GAMGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of +15.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs VSQTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while VSQTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ZUKI Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while ZUKI trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SMPBF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SRVTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SCTGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs WIGAF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ENDRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NVNT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs YDRMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GGAMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs PRYNF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs FRZT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs TAPM Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 954.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while TAPM trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SWMIF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs EPYFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 719.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KSMRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 687.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IMGX Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GMETF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 634.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs APETF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 625.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while APETF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ATIG Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 593K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs WGRFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 447.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IENT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 150.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while IENT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs TIIDF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs COUV Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs CLIS Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NTEK Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs STIE Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs LIVC Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs PLGC Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 13.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs WINRW Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GMGT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ADTR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs FASDF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs VRVR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs YVRLF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs AXNVF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs WINR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs HTSF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs TERA Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BLKCF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SPLY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IPUB Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs RIVX Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SPYR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 351. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is more volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GBNW Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $27.18, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.97, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.