Capcom Co., Ltd.
Capcom Co., Ltd. CCOEF Peers
See (CCOEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCOEF | $29.43 | +0.00% | 12.3B | 37.73 | $0.78 | +0.92% |
| NTDOF | $87.90 | -0.68% | 101.7B | 53.94 | $1.62 | +1.15% |
| NTDOY | $21.66 | -2.48% | 101B | 54.20 | $0.40 | +1.20% |
| NETTF | $29.17 | +7.05% | 92.7B | 20.84 | $1.40 | +1.90% |
| KONMY | $71.59 | +10.75% | 19.4B | 37.88 | $1.89 | +0.52% |
| NEXOF | $18.40 | +0.00% | 14.9B | 18.04 | $1.02 | +1.05% |
| NEXOY | $18.23 | -2.44% | 14.8B | 17.87 | $1.02 | +0.50% |
| CCOEY | $14.92 | -1.71% | 12.5B | 38.21 | $0.39 | +0.84% |
| BLBLF | $22.38 | +0.00% | 9.2B | -111.90 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| SQNXF | $67.75 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 49.09 | $1.38 | +1.27% |
Stock Comparison
CCOEF vs NTDOF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NTDOF trades at $87.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NTDOY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NTDOY trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NETTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NETTF trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and NETTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs KONMY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while KONMY trades at $71.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NEXOF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NEXOF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and NEXOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs NEXOY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NEXOY trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs CCOEY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while CCOEY trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BLBLF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while BLBLF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -111.90. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and BLBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs SQNXF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SQNXF trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and SQNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs SQNNY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SQNNY trades at $31.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs OTGLF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while OTGLF trades at $74.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KSFTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while KSFTF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs OTGLY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while OTGLY trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 57.39. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SGAMY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SGAMY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and SGAMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs BCDMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and BCDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs SGAMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SGAMF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs KYYWF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and KYYWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs THQQF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while THQQF trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THQQF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs PRXXF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while PRXXF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs DNACF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while DNACF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNACF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and DNACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs UBSFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while UBSFF trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and UBSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs KYYWY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs UBSFY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while UBSFY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs MIXIF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while MIXIF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and MIXIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs XDNCF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GUNGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GUNGF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GREZF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and GREZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs RVTTY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and RVTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs BOYAF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 678.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while BOYAF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and BOYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs IGGGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while IGGGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs TSVNF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs STLFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while STLFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs RMDEF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while RMDEF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -225.22. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SCFR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SCFR trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs AKAFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs FRRDF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while FRRDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and FRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs ENADF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while ENADF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GENTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GENTF trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and GENTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs PONGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while PONGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs POPRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs EAGRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while EAGRF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and EAGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs FGRTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and FGRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs GAMGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of +15.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IDGAF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while IDGAF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs VSQTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while VSQTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SMPBF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and SMPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs SRVTF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and SRVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs SCTGF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and SCTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs WIGAF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and WIGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs ENDRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and ENDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs NVNT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and NVNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs YDRMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and YDRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs BLITF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GGAMF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GGAMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ZUKI Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while ZUKI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs FRZT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while FRZT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs PRYNF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and PRYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs APETF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while APETF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APETF's ROE of +4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and APETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs TAPM Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 983K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while TAPM trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SWMIF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and SWMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs EPYFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 722.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GMETF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 719.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and GMETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs KSMRF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 685K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and KSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs IMGX Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and IMGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs WGRFF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 447.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and WGRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs ATIG Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 296.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and ATIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs IENT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 150.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while IENT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs TIIDF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and TIIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs PLGC Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs COUV Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and COUV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs CLIS Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs NTEK Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs STIE Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs LIVC Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and LIVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs WINRW Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and WINRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs GMGT Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs ADTR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and ADTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs FASDF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs VRVR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and VRVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs SPYR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs AXNVF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs YVRLF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs WINR Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and WINR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs HTSF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and HTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs TERA Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs BLKCF Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs SPLY Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs IPUB Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF and IPUB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCOEF vs RIVX Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.
CCOEF vs GBNW Comparison
CCOEF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCOEF stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCOEF is priced at $29.43, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.73, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCOEF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCOEF is less volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCOEF.