Centaur Media Plc
Centaur Media Plc (CAUUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAUUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUUF | $0.43 | +0.00% | 63.6M | -4.80 | -$0.09 | +5.51% |
PGPEF | $109.96 | +0.00% | 27.6B | 14.10 | $7.80 | +3.61% |
PUBGY | $23.04 | +1.23% | 23.1B | 11.79 | $1.95 | +3.28% |
WPPGF | $5.58 | -5.19% | 6B | 8.45 | $0.66 | +9.04% |
DNTUF | $22.79 | +0.00% | 5.9B | -4.63 | -$4.92 | +3.96% |
DNTUY | $20.46 | +4.12% | 5.3B | -4.14 | -$4.93 | +3.16% |
CYGIY | $5.21 | -0.76% | 5.3B | 37.21 | $0.14 | N/A |
CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
JCDXY | $8.87 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 12.67 | $0.70 | +3.51% |
JCDXF | $17.25 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 12.32 | $1.40 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
CAUUF vs PGPEF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PGPEF trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PGPEF's competition here
CAUUF vs PUBGY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PUBGY trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PUBGY's competition here
CAUUF vs WPPGF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while WPPGF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check WPPGF's competition here
CAUUF vs DNTUF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while DNTUF trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check DNTUF's competition here
CAUUF vs DNTUY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while DNTUY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check DNTUY's competition here
CAUUF vs CYGIY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CYGIY trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CYGIY's competition here
CAUUF vs CYAGF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CYAGF's competition here
CAUUF vs JCDXY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check JCDXY's competition here
CAUUF vs JCDXF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while JCDXF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check JCDXF's competition here
CAUUF vs SOTDF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while SOTDF trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check SOTDF's competition here
CAUUF vs HKUOY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while HKUOY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check HKUOY's competition here
CAUUF vs HKUOF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while HKUOF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check HKUOF's competition here
CAUUF vs AIAPF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check AIAPF's competition here
CAUUF vs FRRFF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check FRRFF's competition here
CAUUF vs YUGVF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while YUGVF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 415.50. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check YUGVF's competition here
CAUUF vs SPIDY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check SPIDY's competition here
CAUUF vs NXFNF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check NXFNF's competition here
CAUUF vs MCCLF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check MCCLF's competition here
CAUUF vs TTTPF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check TTTPF's competition here
CAUUF vs PROM Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PROM's competition here
CAUUF vs PTMEY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PTMEY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PTMEY's competition here
CAUUF vs SCPPF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while SCPPF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check SCPPF's competition here
CAUUF vs CNFN Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CNFN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CNFN's competition here
CAUUF vs KLTI Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check KLTI's competition here
CAUUF vs VCCLF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check VCCLF's competition here
CAUUF vs PCOFF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PCOFF's competition here
CAUUF vs OPESF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check OPESF's competition here
CAUUF vs GTNLF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check GTNLF's competition here
CAUUF vs NHLPF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check NHLPF's competition here
CAUUF vs EZOO Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check EZOO's competition here
CAUUF vs GMGZ Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while GMGZ trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check GMGZ's competition here
CAUUF vs ACHN Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ACHN's competition here
CAUUF vs IFUS Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while IFUS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check IFUS's competition here
CAUUF vs SNIPF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while SNIPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check SNIPF's competition here
CAUUF vs AATV Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check AATV's competition here
CAUUF vs SPTY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while SPTY trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check SPTY's competition here
CAUUF vs INEOF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check INEOF's competition here
CAUUF vs TGNT Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while TGNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check TGNT's competition here
CAUUF vs UCPA Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check UCPA's competition here
CAUUF vs VYBE Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check VYBE's competition here
CAUUF vs MMDDF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check MMDDF's competition here
CAUUF vs BYOC Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check BYOC's competition here
CAUUF vs CMGR Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CMGR's competition here
CAUUF vs DBMM Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check DBMM's competition here
CAUUF vs FBOP Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check FBOP's competition here
CAUUF vs MMND Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check MMND's competition here
CAUUF vs CEENF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CEENF's competition here
CAUUF vs ATXMF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 957.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ATXMF's competition here
CAUUF vs LIGA Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 669.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while LIGA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check LIGA's competition here
CAUUF vs PVSP Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 566.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PVSP's competition here
CAUUF vs DMSL Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check DMSL's competition here
CAUUF vs SNPW Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 392.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while SNPW trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check SNPW's competition here
CAUUF vs GOOLF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 340.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check GOOLF's competition here
CAUUF vs CMGO Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 307.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CMGO's competition here
CAUUF vs CYPXF Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 174K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CYPXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CYPXF's competition here
CAUUF vs WWIO Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check WWIO's competition here
CAUUF vs ACTL Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ACTL's competition here
CAUUF vs GBXI Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check GBXI's competition here
CAUUF vs NWCN Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 50.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check NWCN's competition here
CAUUF vs NXMR Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check NXMR's competition here
CAUUF vs TRBO Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check TRBO's competition here
CAUUF vs ITKH Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ITKH's competition here
CAUUF vs PRKI Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PRKI's competition here
CAUUF vs NBDR Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check NBDR's competition here
CAUUF vs EPGC Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check EPGC's competition here
CAUUF vs RFII Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check RFII's competition here
CAUUF vs PSYC Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check PSYC's competition here
CAUUF vs CYGT Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check CYGT's competition here
CAUUF vs BWAV Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check BWAV's competition here
CAUUF vs ISML Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ISML's competition here
CAUUF vs WGEE Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check WGEE's competition here
CAUUF vs BXNG Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check BXNG's competition here
CAUUF vs GTRL Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 230. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check GTRL's competition here
CAUUF vs ADST Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ADST's competition here
CAUUF vs LOGX Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check LOGX's competition here
CAUUF vs VPSN Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check VPSN's competition here
CAUUF vs ADTY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ADTY's competition here
CAUUF vs LTMP Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check LTMP's competition here
CAUUF vs ZULU Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check ZULU's competition here
CAUUF vs MYRY Comparison August 2025
CAUUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAUUF stands at 63.6M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAUUF is priced at $0.43, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAUUF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.80, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAUUF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAUUF is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAUUF.Check MYRY's competition here