CATCo Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd.
CATCo Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd. CAT.L Peers
See (CAT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT.L | £37.50 | N/A | 947.3K | 0.69 | £54.24 | N/A |
| UC65.L | £59.01 | -1.58% | 4.9T | N/A | N/A | +1.67% |
| UB02.L | £4,381.00 | -1.25% | 3.7T | N/A | N/A | +1.80% |
| IUSA.L | £4,373.00 | +0.46% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| SSAC.L | £6,934.00 | +0.16% | 1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,250.00 | -0.68% | 843.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESC.L | £7,821.00 | -0.76% | 781.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,747.50 | -0.84% | 781.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.73% |
| MEUD.L | £21,982.50 | -0.71% | 760B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | £2,474.00 | +0.69% | 735.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAT.L vs UC65.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UC65.L trades at £59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L and UC65.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAT.L vs UB02.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UB02.L trades at £4,381.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IUSA.L trades at £4,373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SSAC.L trades at £6,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 843.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SMEA.L trades at £7,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XESC.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 781.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XESC.L trades at £7,821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XESX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 781.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XESX.L trades at £4,747.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 760B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while MEUD.L trades at £21,982.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IITU.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 735.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IITU.L trades at £2,474.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 688.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while JPSR.L trades at £1,975.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 675.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UB0D.L trades at £2,159.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs JT13.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 675B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while JT13.L trades at £595.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 625.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CNAL.L trades at £11,074.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L and CNAL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAT.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 556.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IWRD.L trades at £6,118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 535.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XDAX.L trades at £18,931.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 497.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while PHGP.L trades at £22,800.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 485.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while GLDA.L trades at £9,708.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 472.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XMMS.L trades at £4,588.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 466.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while MXWS.L trades at £8,976.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 443.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XMUS.L trades at £13,034.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs UC44.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 429.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UC44.L trades at £12,683.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 414.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XMEU.L trades at £8,286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CS51.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 408.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CS51.L trades at £17,104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs EUE.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 371.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while EUE.L trades at £4,634.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 360B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IEEM.L trades at £3,373.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CACX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 340.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CACX.L trades at £6,571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs UB32.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 339.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UB32.L trades at £8,573.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 301.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XSX6.L trades at £11,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 298.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SEMA.L trades at £3,169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 295.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while GBSS.L trades at £22,448.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 290.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SGBX.L trades at £23,432.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 268.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IWFV.L trades at £3,568.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while ISPY.L trades at £2,295.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 230B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CEA1.L trades at £14,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 227.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while RBTX.L trades at £1,057.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 220.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CPJ1.L trades at £14,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs JERE.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 219.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while JERE.L trades at £3,879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 219.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while JRDE.L trades at £3,640.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L and JRDE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAT.L vs SUES.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SUES.L trades at £585.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 203.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IUQF.L trades at £1,096.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 194.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IWFM.L trades at £6,471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while HMEF.L trades at £858.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while PHSP.L trades at £2,243.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XDEV.L trades at £3,672.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SOYU.L trades at £306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 169.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UIFS.L trades at £1,094.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 168.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CEUR.L trades at £30,712.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XXSC.L trades at £5,419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 165.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SPGP.L trades at £1,710.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 159.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 147.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while PRIR.L trades at £1,457.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while GBSP.L trades at £1,697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IEFV.L trades at £855.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CU1.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 139.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CU1.L trades at £45,052.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IPRP.L trades at £2,667.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while ISP6.L trades at £6,369.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs WATL.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while WATL.L trades at £5,736.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs GILS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while GILS.L trades at £10,018.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CUS1.L trades at £37,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XZEU.L trades at £2,784.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L and XZEU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAT.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while 0GWB.IL trades at £501.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XCX6.L trades at £1,289.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs INFL.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs UC79.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UC79.L trades at £1,084.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CG1.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CG1.L trades at £35,847.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 116.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SP5G.L trades at £199.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 62.30. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CB5.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CB5.L trades at £3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XRSG.L trades at £22,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CSPX.L trades at £628.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IJPN.L trades at £1,392.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SPEX.L trades at £4,402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IGSG.L trades at £5,819.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XDEM.L trades at £5,444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs SPES.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while SPES.L trades at £4,160.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while PRIC.L trades at £1,591.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs H50E.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while H50E.L trades at £4,823.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IEUX.L trades at £4,042.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while JRDM.L trades at £2,283.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while RIEG.L trades at £1,434.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IWDA.L trades at £112.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while DAXX.L trades at £18,466.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IMV.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IMV.L trades at £5,747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CSCA.L trades at £16,953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs TRXS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while TRXS.L trades at £3,347.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,400.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while MTIX.L trades at £13,945.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs UB45.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while UB45.L trades at £6,107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IUKD.L trades at £830.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while WQDS.L trades at £542.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XDN0.L trades at £4,158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XLKQ.L trades at £50,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while EQDS.L trades at £542.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs COMM.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while COMM.L trades at £533.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CRPX.L trades at £12,792.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L and CRPX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAT.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while IGUS.L trades at £13,478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while CSP1.L trades at £46,736.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while XDEB.L trades at £3,604.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.
CAT.L vs INAA.L Comparison
CAT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT.L stands at 947.3K. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT.L is priced at £37.50, while INAA.L trades at £8,142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT.L's ROE is +0.46%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT.L.