Cryptology Asset Group plc
Cryptology Asset Group plc (CAGPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAGPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAGPF | $9.50 | +341.86% | 565.9M | -86.36 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +7.75% | 123.4B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| CIIHY | $34.71 | -4.25% | 57.7B | 16.45 | $2.11 | +2.09% |
| MQBKY | $139.76 | -0.72% | 54.8B | 19.81 | $7.18 | +2.89% |
| MCQEF | $141.12 | +0.47% | 51.5B | 19.63 | $7.19 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $2.12 | -30.03% | 34.4B | 10.10 | $0.21 | +3.43% |
| GUOSF | $1.18 | -13.87% | 26.5B | 7.87 | $0.15 | +5.26% |
| NRSCF | $6.71 | -6.81% | 19.8B | 8.83 | $0.76 | +5.79% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +0.89% |
| HUATF | $1.70 | +0.00% | 17.4B | 6.80 | $0.25 | +10.08% |
Stock Comparison
CAGPF vs IBKKF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check IBKKF's competition here
CAGPF vs CIIHY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CIIHY trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CIIHY's competition here
CAGPF vs MQBKY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while MQBKY trades at $139.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check MQBKY's competition here
CAGPF vs MCQEF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while MCQEF trades at $141.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check MCQEF's competition here
CAGPF vs CIIHF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CIIHF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CIIHF's competition here
CAGPF vs GUOSF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while GUOSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check GUOSF's competition here
CAGPF vs NRSCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while NRSCF trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check NRSCF's competition here
CAGPF vs HTNGF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check HTNGF's competition here
CAGPF vs HUATF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while HUATF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check HUATF's competition here
CAGPF vs CMSQY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CMSQY trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CMSQY's competition here
CAGPF vs CMSQF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CMSQF trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CMSQF's competition here
CAGPF vs CNICF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CNICF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CNICF's competition here
CAGPF vs CGXYY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CGXYY trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 252.73. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CGXYY's competition here
CAGPF vs HAITY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check HAITY's competition here
CAGPF vs DSEEY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DSEEY trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DSEEY's competition here
CAGPF vs DSECF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DSECF's competition here
CAGPF vs WSOUF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check WSOUF's competition here
CAGPF vs BRPHF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BRPHF's competition here
CAGPF vs IVTJF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while IVTJF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check IVTJF's competition here
CAGPF vs IGGHY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while IGGHY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check IGGHY's competition here
CAGPF vs IVTJY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check IVTJY's competition here
CAGPF vs CLPE Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CLPE's competition here
CAGPF vs IGGRF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while IGGRF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check IGGRF's competition here
CAGPF vs FNNTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while FNNTF trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check FNNTF's competition here
CAGPF vs MAUSY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while MAUSY trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check MAUSY's competition here
CAGPF vs TCAPF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while TCAPF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check TCAPF's competition here
CAGPF vs LTSAP Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while LTSAP trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check LTSAP's competition here
CAGPF vs PLSQF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check PLSQF's competition here
CAGPF vs LTSA Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check LTSA's competition here
CAGPF vs NHMAF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check NHMAF's competition here
CAGPF vs MNXBF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while MNXBF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -32.69. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check MNXBF's competition here
CAGPF vs DEFTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DEFTF's competition here
CAGPF vs CFNCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CFNCF's competition here
CAGPF vs CBGPY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 825.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CBGPY trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CBGPY's competition here
CAGPF vs CCORF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 820.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CCORF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -36.36. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CCORF's competition here
CAGPF vs CNSRF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 793.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CNSRF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CNSRF's competition here
CAGPF vs LKADF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check LKADF's competition here
CAGPF vs PHIG Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 692.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while PHIG trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check PHIG's competition here
CAGPF vs PHIGW Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 674.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check PHIGW's competition here
CAGPF vs CBGPF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 669.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CBGPF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CBGPF's competition here
CAGPF vs DGTLF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 614.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DGTLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DGTLF's competition here
CAGPF vs CSCHF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 507.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CSCHF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CSCHF's competition here
CAGPF vs NAGGF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check NAGGF's competition here
CAGPF vs ABGSF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while ABGSF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check ABGSF's competition here
CAGPF vs CESTY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CESTY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CESTY's competition here
CAGPF vs CESTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CESTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CESTF's competition here
CAGPF vs APPCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while APPCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check APPCF's competition here
CAGPF vs CYFRF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CYFRF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 113.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CYFRF's competition here
CAGPF vs ARCNF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 135.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check ARCNF's competition here
CAGPF vs NPPTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while NPPTF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check NPPTF's competition here
CAGPF vs OZFRY Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while OZFRY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check OZFRY's competition here
CAGPF vs PNPFF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while PNPFF trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check PNPFF's competition here
CAGPF vs STGC Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check STGC's competition here
CAGPF vs ABIT Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while ABIT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check ABIT's competition here
CAGPF vs GEVI Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while GEVI trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check GEVI's competition here
CAGPF vs CURN Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CURN trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CURN's competition here
CAGPF vs XAUMF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while XAUMF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check XAUMF's competition here
CAGPF vs GBCHF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check GBCHF's competition here
CAGPF vs BKLIF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BKLIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BKLIF's competition here
CAGPF vs UFFRF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check UFFRF's competition here
CAGPF vs DMGGF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DMGGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DMGGF's competition here
CAGPF vs CBTTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CBTTF's competition here
CAGPF vs FDCT Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while FDCT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check FDCT's competition here
CAGPF vs CMZZF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CMZZF's competition here
CAGPF vs BBKCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BBKCF's competition here
CAGPF vs CRMZ Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CRMZ trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CRMZ's competition here
CAGPF vs CFLSF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CFLSF's competition here
CAGPF vs ARBKF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while ARBKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check ARBKF's competition here
CAGPF vs EBML Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check EBML's competition here
CAGPF vs HAFG Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while HAFG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check HAFG's competition here
CAGPF vs IHLDF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while IHLDF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check IHLDF's competition here
CAGPF vs BULT Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BULT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BULT's competition here
CAGPF vs HYHDF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while HYHDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check HYHDF's competition here
CAGPF vs FFTTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check FFTTF's competition here
CAGPF vs SMURF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check SMURF's competition here
CAGPF vs BCNWF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BCNWF's competition here
CAGPF vs FWAV Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check FWAV's competition here
CAGPF vs DYNA Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DYNA's competition here
CAGPF vs MATEF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while MATEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check MATEF's competition here
CAGPF vs AVFCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check AVFCF's competition here
CAGPF vs DBKSF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DBKSF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DBKSF's competition here
CAGPF vs ABSOF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check ABSOF's competition here
CAGPF vs DPXCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check DPXCF's competition here
CAGPF vs TRAA Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check TRAA's competition here
CAGPF vs ITEX Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while ITEX trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check ITEX's competition here
CAGPF vs HIPH Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check HIPH's competition here
CAGPF vs BTCWF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BTCWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BTCWF's competition here
CAGPF vs CSTXF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CSTXF's competition here
CAGPF vs BLVDF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BLVDF's competition here
CAGPF vs CCPUF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CCPUF's competition here
CAGPF vs AAMTF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check AAMTF's competition here
CAGPF vs PHIL Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check PHIL's competition here
CAGPF vs BZRD Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BZRD's competition here
CAGPF vs OSHDF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while OSHDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check OSHDF's competition here
CAGPF vs CRKR Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check CRKR's competition here
CAGPF vs BLQC Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BLQC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BLQC's competition here
CAGPF vs BKBLF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BKBLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BKBLF's competition here
CAGPF vs BEGI Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BEGI's competition here
CAGPF vs BIDCF Comparison July 2025
CAGPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGPF stands at 565.9M. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGPF is priced at $9.50, while BIDCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -86.36, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CAGPF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +24.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGPF is more volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGPF.Check BIDCF's competition here