Bunzl plc

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JRONF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while JRONF trades at $26.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas JRONF's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JRONF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to JRONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check JRONF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATAAY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while ATAAY trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ATAAY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to ATAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check ATAAY's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BZLFF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while BZLFF trades at $30.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BZLFF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZLFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to BZLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check BZLFF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BPPPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while BPPPF trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BPPPF's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to BPPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check BPPPF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BDDDY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while BDDDY trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BDDDY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDDDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to BDDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check BDDDY's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JRONY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while JRONY trades at $47.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas JRONY's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JRONY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to JRONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check JRONY's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MCSHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while MCSHF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MCSHF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCSHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to MCSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check MCSHF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OLGPF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while OLGPF trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OLGPF's P/E ratio is 78.70. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to OLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check OLGPF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MSHXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while MSHXF trades at $42.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MSHXF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to MSHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check MSHXF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KARNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while KARNF trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas KARNF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KARNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to KARNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check KARNF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SGPPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while SGPPY trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SGPPY's P/E ratio is 68.50. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGPPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to SGPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check SGPPY's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while SGPPF trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SGPPF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to SGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check SGPPF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACNFF has a market cap of 754.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while ACNFF trades at $25.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ACNFF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to ACNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check ACNFF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DMPLF has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while DMPLF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas DMPLF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DMPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to DMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check DMPLF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OISXF has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while OISXF trades at $7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OISXF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OISXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to OISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check OISXF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GLBGF has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while GLBGF trades at $143.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GLBGF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLBGF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to GLBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check GLBGF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IVFH has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while IVFH trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas IVFH's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVFH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to IVFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check IVFH's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, COLFF has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while COLFF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas COLFF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to COLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check COLFF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OGOFF has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while OGOFF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OGOFF's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGOFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to OGOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check OGOFF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EWOOF has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while EWOOF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EWOOF's P/E ratio is -69.37. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EWOOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to EWOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check EWOOF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AIXND has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while AIXND trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas AIXND's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIXND's ROE of -8.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to AIXND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check AIXND's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UNMK has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while UNMK trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas UNMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNMK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to UNMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check UNMK's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CEUMF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while CEUMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CEUMF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEUMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to CEUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check CEUMF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACITF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while ACITF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ACITF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACITF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to ACITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check ACITF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AIXN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while AIXN trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas AIXN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIXN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to AIXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check AIXN's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MCLE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while MCLE trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MCLE's P/E ratio is -17.16. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to MCLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check MCLE's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NHYF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while NHYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NHYF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to NHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check NHYF's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WDRP has a market cap of 411.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while WDRP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas WDRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDRP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to WDRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check WDRP's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DLAD has a market cap of 394.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while DLAD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas DLAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLAD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to DLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check DLAD's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ENHD has a market cap of 211.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while ENHD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ENHD's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENHD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to ENHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check ENHD's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VRUS has a market cap of 202.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while VRUS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas VRUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to VRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check VRUS's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NCTW has a market cap of 131.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while NCTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCTW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to NCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check NCTW's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JAMN has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while JAMN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas JAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to JAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check JAMN's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NXTH has a market cap of 7.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while NXTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NXTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXTH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to NXTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check NXTH's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GLCC has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while GLCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GLCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to GLCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check GLCC's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SYBRQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while SYBRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SYBRQ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYBRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to SYBRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check SYBRQ's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GPDB has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while GPDB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GPDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to GPDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check GPDB's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PACV has a market cap of 363. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while PACV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas PACV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACV's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to PACV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check PACV's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LFER has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while LFER trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas LFER's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LFER's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to LFER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check LFER's competition here

BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NRYYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.03, while NRYYY trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NRYYY's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NRYYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to NRYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.Check NRYYY's competition here