Bunzl plc
Bunzl plc BZLFY Peers
See (BZLFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZLFY | $15.96 | +0.19% | 10.4B | 15.96 | $1.00 | +3.01% |
| JRONF | $21.50 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 19.03 | $1.13 | +3.07% |
| BZLFF | $31.25 | +0.00% | 10.2B | 15.55 | $2.01 | +3.14% |
| BPPPF | $25.73 | +0.00% | 8.7B | 19.49 | $1.32 | +1.35% |
| BDDDY | $24.57 | +1.48% | 8.2B | 18.47 | $1.33 | N/A |
| JRONY | $50.57 | +3.18% | 8B | 22.20 | $2.30 | +2.54% |
| ATAAY | $5.05 | +6.32% | 2.7B | 7.89 | $0.64 | +0.20% |
| OLGPF | $0.68 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 68.00 | $0.01 | +6.79% |
| MCSHF | $2.08 | +30.82% | 2.3B | 12.24 | $0.17 | +5.32% |
| MSHXF | $42.85 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 11.64 | $3.68 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
BZLFY vs JRONF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JRONF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while JRONF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas JRONF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JRONF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to JRONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs BZLFF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BZLFF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while BZLFF trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas BZLFF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZLFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to BZLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs BPPPF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BPPPF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while BPPPF trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas BPPPF's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to BPPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs BDDDY Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BDDDY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while BDDDY trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas BDDDY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDDDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to BDDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs JRONY Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JRONY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while JRONY trades at $50.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas JRONY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JRONY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to JRONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs ATAAY Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ATAAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while ATAAY trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas ATAAY's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATAAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to ATAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs OLGPF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OLGPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while OLGPF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas OLGPF's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to OLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs MCSHF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MCSHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while MCSHF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas MCSHF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCSHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to MCSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs MSHXF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MSHXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while MSHXF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas MSHXF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSHXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to MSHXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs KARNF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KARNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while KARNF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas KARNF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KARNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to KARNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs SGPPY Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SGPPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while SGPPY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas SGPPY's P/E ratio is 68.50. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGPPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to SGPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs SGPPF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while SGPPF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas SGPPF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to SGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs ACNFF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ACNFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while ACNFF trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas ACNFF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to ACNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs DMPLF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DMPLF has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while DMPLF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas DMPLF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DMPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to DMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs OISXF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OISXF has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while OISXF trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas OISXF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OISXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to OISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs GLBGF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GLBGF has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while GLBGF trades at $143.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas GLBGF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLBGF's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to GLBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs IVFH Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IVFH has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while IVFH trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas IVFH's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVFH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to IVFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs COLFF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, COLFF has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while COLFF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas COLFF's P/E ratio is 65.12. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to COLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs EWOOF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EWOOF has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while EWOOF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas EWOOF's P/E ratio is -69.37. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EWOOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to EWOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs AIXND Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AIXND has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while AIXND trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas AIXND's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIXND's ROE of -9.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to AIXND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs OGOFF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OGOFF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while OGOFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas OGOFF's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OGOFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to OGOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs UNMK Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, UNMK has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while UNMK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas UNMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNMK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to UNMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs CEUMF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CEUMF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while CEUMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas CEUMF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEUMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to CEUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs ACITF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ACITF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while ACITF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas ACITF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACITF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to ACITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs AIXN Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AIXN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while AIXN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas AIXN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIXN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to AIXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs NHYF Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NHYF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while NHYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas NHYF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to NHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs MCLE Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MCLE has a market cap of 959K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while MCLE trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas MCLE's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to MCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs WDRP Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WDRP has a market cap of 411.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while WDRP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas WDRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDRP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to WDRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs DLAD Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DLAD has a market cap of 394.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while DLAD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas DLAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLAD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to DLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs ENHD Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENHD has a market cap of 327.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while ENHD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas ENHD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENHD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to ENHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs VRUS Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VRUS has a market cap of 202.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while VRUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas VRUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to VRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs NCTW Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NCTW has a market cap of 131.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while NCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas NCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCTW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to NCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs JAMN Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JAMN has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while JAMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas JAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to JAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs GLCC Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GLCC has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while GLCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas GLCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to GLCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs SYBRQ Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SYBRQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while SYBRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas SYBRQ's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYBRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is less volatile compared to SYBRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs GPDB Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GPDB has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while GPDB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas GPDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to GPDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs PACV Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PACV has a market cap of 363. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while PACV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas PACV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACV's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to PACV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs NXTH Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NXTH has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while NXTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas NXTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXTH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to NXTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs LFER Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LFER has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while LFER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas LFER's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LFER's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to LFER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.
BZLFY vs NRYYY Comparison
BZLFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZLFY stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NRYYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZLFY is priced at $15.96, while NRYYY trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZLFY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.96, whereas NRYYY's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, BZLFY's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NRYYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZLFY is more volatile compared to NRYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZLFY.