BuzzFeed, Inc.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 472.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while NFLX trades at $1,110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 198.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while DIS trades at $110.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 32.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LYV trades at $140.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 29.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while FWONK trades at $94.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is -784.25. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FWONK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 29.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while FWONA trades at $86.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is -663.23. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FWONA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 22.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while FOX trades at $48.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 22.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while FOXA trades at $52.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 22.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while WBD trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while VIAC trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 16.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while NWS trades at $32.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while NWSA trades at $28.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 14.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while WMG trades at $27.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WMG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while TKO trades at $160.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 8030.50. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 10.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while ROKU trades at $68.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -94.22. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while EDR trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while PARAA trades at $22.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while PARA trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while PARAP trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while WWE trades at $100.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while SIRI trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LLYVK trades at $76.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is -231.67. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LLYVA trades at $75.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is -222.53. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while NXST trades at $169.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while MSGS trades at $195.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 929.38. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CNK trades at $30.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while BATRA trades at $44.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -88.30. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while BATRK trades at $41.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -82.06. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while MANU trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while APE trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LION trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while MSGE trades at $37.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while BOWL trades at $11.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BOWL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while IMAX trades at $25.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while SPHR trades at $35.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while AMC trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while SBGI trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 822.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while HUYA trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -122.67. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 763.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while PLAY trades at $22.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 529.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while MCS trades at $17.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -68.28. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 493.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while RSVR trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 63.08. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 273.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while IQ trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LIVX trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 262.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while AMCX trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 127.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while AENT trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 119.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while GAIA trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while GNUS trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GNUS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 76.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while AGAE trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 75.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while RSVRW trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 72.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while LVO trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CIDM trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 46.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CNVS trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while RDI trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDI's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 45.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while RDIB trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 36.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while ANGH trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ANGH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 36.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 29.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while TOON trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 28.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while NIPG trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 20.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while ADD trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while MMV trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 13.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while KUKE trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 11.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while DLPN trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CSCW trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 9.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CPOP trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 8.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while AENTW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 6.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while BREA trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while HOFV trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CSSE trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258051.00. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.

BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.50M. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 22775.00. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.07, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.