BuzzFeed, Inc.
BuzzFeed, Inc. BZFDW Peers
See (BZFDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZFDW | $0.08 | +0.00% | 2.6M | 0.42 | $0.17 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,339.13 | +0.00% | 550.5B | 61.10 | $21.17 | N/A |
| DIS | $124.01 | +0.00% | 222B | 25.20 | $4.90 | +0.81% |
| LYV | $151.28 | +0.00% | 34.7B | 50.81 | $2.95 | N/A |
| FWONK | $104.50 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2036.40 | $0.05 | N/A |
| FWONA | $94.96 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 1529.50 | $0.06 | N/A |
| WBD | $11.46 | +0.00% | 27.1B | -2.49 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOX | $51.63 | +0.00% | 24.2B | 12.77 | $4.04 | +0.96% |
| FOXA | $56.04 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 13.85 | $4.04 | +0.96% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.52% |
Stock Comparison
BZFDW vs NFLX Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 550.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while NFLX trades at $1,339.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs DIS Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 222B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while DIS trades at $124.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LYV Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LYV trades at $151.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 50.81. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs FWONK Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while FWONK trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 2036.40. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs FWONA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while FWONA trades at $94.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1529.50. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs WBD Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while WBD trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs FOX Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while FOX trades at $51.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs FOXA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while FOXA trades at $56.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs VIAC Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs NWS Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while NWS trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs NWSA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while NWSA trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs WMG Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while WMG trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs TKO Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while TKO trades at $181.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 88.71. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs ROKU Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while ROKU trades at $87.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -118.08. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs EDR Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs PARA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while PARA trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs PARAA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while PARAA trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs PARAP Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs WWE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs SIRI Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while SIRI trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LLYVK Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LLYVK trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 297.74. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LLYVA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LLYVA trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 291.56. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs NXST Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while NXST trades at $172.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs MSGS Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while MSGS trades at $208.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 976.48. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CNK Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CNK trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs MANU Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while MANU trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -32.05. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs BATRK Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while BATRK trades at $46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -139.91. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs BATRA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while BATRA trades at $49.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -147.94. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs APE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LGF-B Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LGF-A Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs MSGE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while MSGE trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs BOWL Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs IQ Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while IQ trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LION Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LION trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs SPHR Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while SPHR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs IMAX Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while IMAX trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 59.37. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs AMC Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while AMC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs PLAY Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while PLAY trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs SBGI Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 977.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while SBGI trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs HUYA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while HUYA trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -33.07. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs MCS Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 513.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while MCS trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -40.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs RSVR Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 505.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while RSVR trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs AMCX Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while AMCX trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LIVX Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs AENT Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 211M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while AENT trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs GAIA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while GAIA trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs BREA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while BREA trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs GNUS Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LVO Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LVO trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LVO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CNVS Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CNVS trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs RSVRW Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while RSVRW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs AGAE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while AGAE trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs NIPG Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while NIPG trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CIDM Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs RDI Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while RDI trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs RDIB Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while RDIB trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs TOON Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while TOON trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs ANGH Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while ANGH trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs ANGHW Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs ADD Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while ADD trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs MMV Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while MMV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs DLPN Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while DLPN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CSCW Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs AENTW Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while AENTW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CPOP Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CPOP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs KUKE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while KUKE trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs HOFV Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while HOFV trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CSSEP Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CSSEP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CSSEN Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CSSE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CSSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs BLMZ Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs CSSEL Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs HOFVW Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs EMWP Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs AESE Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs DISCB Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs HMTV Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs ESGC Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs VIACA Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs DISCK Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs LVOPP Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BZFDW has daily volatility of 43.22 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
BZFDW vs RDBX Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs MSGN Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs VIACP Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.
BZFDW vs RDBXW Comparison
BZFDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFDW stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFDW is priced at $0.08, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFDW currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BZFDW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFDW is more volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFDW.