BYT Holdings Ltd.

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, WSP.TO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WSP.TO trades at CA$281.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas WSP.TO's P/E ratio is 51.38. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WSP.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to WSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check WSP.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, STN.TO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while STN.TO trades at CA$149.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas STN.TO's P/E ratio is 44.48. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STN.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to STN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check STN.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ATRL.TO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ATRL.TO trades at CA$97.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ATRL.TO's P/E ratio is 55.49. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ATRL.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to ATRL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check ATRL.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SNC.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SNC.TO trades at CA$43.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SNC.TO's P/E ratio is 92.53. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SNC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to SNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check SNC.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BDGI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BDGI.TO trades at CA$52.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas BDGI.TO's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BDGI.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to BDGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check BDGI.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BDT.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BDT.TO trades at CA$28.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas BDT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BDT.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to BDT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check BDT.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ARE.TO trades at CA$19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ARE.TO's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to ARE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check ARE.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DRT.TO has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while DRT.TO trades at CA$0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas DRT.TO's P/E ratio is 81.00. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DRT.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to DRT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check DRT.TO's competition here

BYT.CN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BYT.CN stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IBG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYT.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while IBG.TO trades at CA$19.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BYT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas IBG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, BYT.CN's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IBG.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BYT.CN is less volatile compared to IBG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYT.CN.Check IBG.TO's competition here