Beyond Commerce, Inc.
Beyond Commerce, Inc. (BYOC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BYOC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYOC | $0.00 | -98.00% | 1.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PGPEF | $109.96 | +0.00% | 27.6B | 14.24 | $7.72 | +3.61% |
| PUBGY | $22.67 | -0.18% | 22.8B | 11.79 | $1.93 | +3.31% |
| WPPGF | $5.55 | -0.45% | 6B | 8.41 | $0.66 | +9.08% |
| DNTUF | $22.87 | +0.35% | 5.9B | -4.67 | -$4.90 | +3.95% |
| DNTUY | $20.51 | -0.86% | 5.3B | -4.19 | -$4.90 | +3.15% |
| CYGIY | $5.21 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 37.21 | $0.14 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 28.86 | $0.28 | +1.39% |
| JCDXY | $8.87 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 13.65 | $0.65 | +3.51% |
| JCDXF | $17.25 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 13.27 | $1.30 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
BYOC vs PGPEF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PGPEF trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PGPEF's competition here
BYOC vs PUBGY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PUBGY trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PUBGY's competition here
BYOC vs WPPGF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while WPPGF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check WPPGF's competition here
BYOC vs DNTUF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while DNTUF trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check DNTUF's competition here
BYOC vs DNTUY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while DNTUY trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check DNTUY's competition here
BYOC vs CYGIY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CYGIY trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CYGIY's competition here
BYOC vs CYAGF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CYAGF's competition here
BYOC vs JCDXY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check JCDXY's competition here
BYOC vs JCDXF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while JCDXF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check JCDXF's competition here
BYOC vs SOTDF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while SOTDF trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check SOTDF's competition here
BYOC vs HKUOY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while HKUOY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check HKUOY's competition here
BYOC vs HKUOF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while HKUOF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check HKUOF's competition here
BYOC vs AIAPF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check AIAPF's competition here
BYOC vs FRRFF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check FRRFF's competition here
BYOC vs YUGVF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 552.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while YUGVF trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 472.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check YUGVF's competition here
BYOC vs SPIDY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check SPIDY's competition here
BYOC vs NXFNF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check NXFNF's competition here
BYOC vs MCCLF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check MCCLF's competition here
BYOC vs TTTPF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check TTTPF's competition here
BYOC vs PROM Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PROM's competition here
BYOC vs PTMEY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PTMEY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PTMEY's competition here
BYOC vs SCPPF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while SCPPF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check SCPPF's competition here
BYOC vs CNFN Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CNFN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CNFN's competition here
BYOC vs KLTI Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check KLTI's competition here
BYOC vs VCCLF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check VCCLF's competition here
BYOC vs PCOFF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PCOFF's competition here
BYOC vs OPESF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check OPESF's competition here
BYOC vs GTNLF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check GTNLF's competition here
BYOC vs CAUUF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CAUUF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CAUUF's competition here
BYOC vs NHLPF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check NHLPF's competition here
BYOC vs EZOO Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check EZOO's competition here
BYOC vs GMGZ Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while GMGZ trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check GMGZ's competition here
BYOC vs IFUS Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while IFUS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check IFUS's competition here
BYOC vs ACHN Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ACHN's competition here
BYOC vs SNIPF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while SNIPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check SNIPF's competition here
BYOC vs AATV Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check AATV's competition here
BYOC vs SPTY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while SPTY trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check SPTY's competition here
BYOC vs TGNT Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while TGNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check TGNT's competition here
BYOC vs INEOF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check INEOF's competition here
BYOC vs UCPA Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check UCPA's competition here
BYOC vs VYBE Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check VYBE's competition here
BYOC vs MMDDF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check MMDDF's competition here
BYOC vs CMGR Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CMGR's competition here
BYOC vs DBMM Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check DBMM's competition here
BYOC vs FBOP Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check FBOP's competition here
BYOC vs MMND Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check MMND's competition here
BYOC vs CEENF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CEENF's competition here
BYOC vs ATXMF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 962.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ATXMF's competition here
BYOC vs LIGA Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 674.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while LIGA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check LIGA's competition here
BYOC vs PVSP Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 604.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PVSP's competition here
BYOC vs DMSL Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check DMSL's competition here
BYOC vs SNPW Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 392.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while SNPW trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check SNPW's competition here
BYOC vs GOOLF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check GOOLF's competition here
BYOC vs CMGO Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 307.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CMGO's competition here
BYOC vs CYPXF Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 174K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CYPXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CYPXF's competition here
BYOC vs WWIO Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check WWIO's competition here
BYOC vs ACTL Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC and ACTL have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check ACTL's competition here
BYOC vs GBXI Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check GBXI's competition here
BYOC vs NWCN Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 50.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check NWCN's competition here
BYOC vs NXMR Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check NXMR's competition here
BYOC vs TRBO Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check TRBO's competition here
BYOC vs ITKH Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ITKH's competition here
BYOC vs PRKI Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PRKI's competition here
BYOC vs NBDR Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check NBDR's competition here
BYOC vs EPGC Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check EPGC's competition here
BYOC vs RFII Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check RFII's competition here
BYOC vs PSYC Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check PSYC's competition here
BYOC vs CYGT Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check CYGT's competition here
BYOC vs BWAV Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC and BWAV have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check BWAV's competition here
BYOC vs ISML Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ISML's competition here
BYOC vs WGEE Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check WGEE's competition here
BYOC vs BXNG Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check BXNG's competition here
BYOC vs GTRL Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 230. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check GTRL's competition here
BYOC vs ADST Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ADST's competition here
BYOC vs LOGX Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check LOGX's competition here
BYOC vs VPSN Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check VPSN's competition here
BYOC vs MYRY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check MYRY's competition here
BYOC vs ZULU Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ZULU's competition here
BYOC vs ADTY Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check ADTY's competition here
BYOC vs LTMP Comparison August 2025
BYOC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYOC stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYOC is priced at $0.00, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYOC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BYOC's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYOC is more volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYOC.Check LTMP's competition here