Australian Silica Quartz Group Ltd.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, CHHQY has a market cap of 123.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while CHHQY trades at $13.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas CHHQY's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHHQY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF and CHHQY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, CHHQF has a market cap of 15.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while CHHQF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas CHHQF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHHQF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF and CHHQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, ALMMF has a market cap of 14.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while ALMMF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas ALMMF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to ALMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, ACHHY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while ACHHY trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas ACHHY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACHHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to ACHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, NHYKF has a market cap of 11.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while NHYKF trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas NHYKF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NHYKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to NHYKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, NHYDY has a market cap of 11.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while NHYDY trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas NHYDY's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NHYDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to NHYDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, AWCMY has a market cap of 10.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while AWCMY trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas AWCMY's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AWCMY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to AWCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, AWCMF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while AWCMF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas AWCMF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AWCMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to AWCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, EORBF has a market cap of 91.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while EORBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas EORBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EORBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to EORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, AFML has a market cap of 7656.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while AFML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas AFML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AFML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF and AFML have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, NORNQ has a market cap of 7019.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while NORNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas NORNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NORNQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to NORNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, MNSF has a market cap of 1889.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while MNSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas MNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MNSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF and MNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BXRDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BXRDF stands at 10.01M. In comparison, ORMTQ has a market cap of 1866.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXRDF is priced at $0.04, while ORMTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BXRDF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.55, whereas ORMTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXRDF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ORMTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXRDF is less volatile compared to ORMTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXRDF.