Bang Holdings Corp.
Bang Holdings Corp. BXNG Peers
See (BXNG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BXNG | $0.00 | N/A | 2361.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PUBGY | $26.69 | -0.73% | 26.76B | 14.66 | $1.82 | +3.09% |
| PGPEF | $93.99 | -5.06% | 23.57B | 12.93 | $7.27 | N/A |
| WPPGF | $8.38 | +27.52% | 9.04B | 13.09 | $0.64 | +6.06% |
| DNTUY | $21.84 | -3.51% | 5.67B | -4.39 | -$4.98 | +2.96% |
| DNTUF | $20.99 | -26.48% | 5.45B | -4.21 | -$4.98 | +2.08% |
| HKUOY | $14.66 | -2.40% | 5.39B | 11.28 | $1.30 | N/A |
| CYGIY | $4.81 | +11.09% | 4.87B | 37.00 | $0.13 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +2.28% | 4.09B | 29.93 | $0.27 | +1.39% |
| JCDXF | $17.40 | +12.62% | 3.72B | 12.99 | $1.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BXNG vs PUBGY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 26.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PUBGY trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs PGPEF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PGPEF trades at $93.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs WPPGF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while WPPGF trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs DNTUY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while DNTUY trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs DNTUF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while DNTUF trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs HKUOY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs CYGIY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CYGIY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs CYAGF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs JCDXF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs JCDXY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while JCDXY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and JCDXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs HKUOF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and HKUOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs SOTDF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs AIAPF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs FRRFF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs SPIDY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 487.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and SPIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs YUGVF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 478.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while YUGVF trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 409.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs NXFNF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs MCCLF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and MCCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs TTTPF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs PTMEY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 276.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PTMEY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs PROM Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and PROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs SCPPF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 211.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while SCPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and SCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs KLTI Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and KLTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs VCCLF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 140.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs PCOFF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 125.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs EDHL Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 108.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while EDHL trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs GTNLF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and GTNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs CAUUF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 65.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and CAUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs OPESF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 54.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while OPESF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs CYPXF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 52.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CYPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs GMGZ Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 34.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while GMGZ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs NHLPF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs IFUS Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 29.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while IFUS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs EZOO Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs CNFN Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 24.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CNFN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and CNFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs ACHN Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs SNIPF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 16.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while SNIPF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs SPTY Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 8.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while SPTY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs AATV Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs TGNT Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 6.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while TGNT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs INEOF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs UCPA Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs VYBE Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and VYBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs DBMM Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs MMDDF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and MMDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs BYOC Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and BYOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs CMGR Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and CMGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs FBOP Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs LIGA Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 1.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and LIGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs CEENF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985860.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and CEENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs PVSP Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 944503.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs MMND Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 921297.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs ATXMF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 853141.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and ATXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs CMGO Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 526406.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and CMGO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs DMSL Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484189.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs GOOLF Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 337387.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs SNPW Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 209401.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while SNPW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and SNPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs WWIO Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 138998.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs ACTL Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76834.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs NXMR Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37413.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and NXMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs TRBO Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34888.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and TRBO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs PRKI Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22720.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and PRKI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs NBDR Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 20969.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and NBDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs EPGC Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18377.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs PSYC Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 17080.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and PSYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs RFII Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15108.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs GBXI Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14086.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and GBXI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs CYGT Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8450.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and CYGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs NWCN Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 7527.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs ISML Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4260.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and ISML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs WGEE Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3864.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs GTRL Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 3456.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs ITKH Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 2331.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs BWAV Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BWAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs ADST Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.
BXNG vs LOGX Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG and LOGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BXNG vs VPSN Comparison
BXNG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BXNG stands at 2361.00. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, BXNG is priced at $0.00, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BXNG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BXNG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VPSN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BXNG is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BXNG.