Beaver Coal Company, Limited
Beaver Coal Company, Limited (BVERS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BVERS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BVERS | $3,050.02 | +0.00% | 75.9M | N/A | N/A | +7.21% |
| RNHEF | $0.00 | -0.00% | 93.9B | -2.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| VONOY | $15.92 | -1.39% | 26.9B | -30.34 | -$0.53 | +4.13% |
| VNNVF | $31.50 | +2.83% | 26.3B | -29.72 | -$1.06 | +4.51% |
| CLNXF | $35.84 | -7.12% | 26.1B | -462.50 | -$0.08 | +0.20% |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +4.02% |
| SURDF | $38.69 | +0.00% | 19.4B | 14.87 | $2.77 | +1.15% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 33.00 | $1.00 | +4.52% |
| SWPFF | $2.69 | +19.56% | 15.5B | -134.50 | -$0.02 | +5.25% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +0.00% | 12.3B | 9.32 | $1.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BVERS vs RNHEF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check RNHEF's competition here
BVERS vs VONOY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while VONOY trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -30.34. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check VONOY's competition here
BVERS vs VNNVF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while VNNVF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check VNNVF's competition here
BVERS vs CLNXF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CLNXF trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -462.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CLNXF's competition here
BVERS vs VTAGY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to VTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check VTAGY's competition here
BVERS vs SURDF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SURDF trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SURDF's competition here
BVERS vs VTWRF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check VTWRF's competition here
BVERS vs SWPFF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SWPFF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -134.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SWPFF's competition here
BVERS vs SURYY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SURYY's competition here
BVERS vs IFSUF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while IFSUF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check IFSUF's competition here
BVERS vs CLILF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CLILF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CLILF's competition here
BVERS vs AZRGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check AZRGF's competition here
BVERS vs SWPRF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SWPRF's competition here
BVERS vs NXDCF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while NXDCF trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -179.43. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check NXDCF's competition here
BVERS vs HULCF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while HULCF trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check HULCF's competition here
BVERS vs WRFRF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while WRFRF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check WRFRF's competition here
BVERS vs ESRCF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ESRCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ESRCF's competition here
BVERS vs LEGIF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while LEGIF trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check LEGIF's competition here
BVERS vs LGMMY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to LGMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check LGMMY's competition here
BVERS vs SCOTF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SCOTF's competition here
BVERS vs HLPPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while HLPPF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to HLPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check HLPPF's competition here
BVERS vs NMEHF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while NMEHF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to NMEHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check NMEHF's competition here
BVERS vs HLPPY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while HLPPY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check HLPPY's competition here
BVERS vs FBGGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 136.64. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check FBGGF's competition here
BVERS vs SSSAF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SSSAF trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SSSAF's competition here
BVERS vs CWSRF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CWSRF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 84.67. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CWSRF's competition here
BVERS vs TYTMF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while TYTMF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check TYTMF's competition here
BVERS vs TAGYY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to TAGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check TAGYY's competition here
BVERS vs AANNF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while AANNF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check AANNF's competition here
BVERS vs IWGFF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while IWGFF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 147.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check IWGFF's competition here
BVERS vs CTRGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CTRGF's competition here
BVERS vs VGPBF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while VGPBF trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check VGPBF's competition here
BVERS vs CGSHY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to CGSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CGSHY's competition here
BVERS vs TAGOF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while TAGOF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check TAGOF's competition here
BVERS vs GRDDY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check GRDDY's competition here
BVERS vs CNPPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CNPPF's competition here
BVERS vs GRGTF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while GRGTF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check GRGTF's competition here
BVERS vs SRRLF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SRRLF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SRRLF's competition here
BVERS vs HYSNF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check HYSNF's competition here
BVERS vs GRNNF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while GRNNF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check GRNNF's competition here
BVERS vs WIHLY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to WIHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check WIHLY's competition here
BVERS vs DUSCF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to DUSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check DUSCF's competition here
BVERS vs ASGTF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ASGTF trades at $41.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 514.74. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ASGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ASGTF's competition here
BVERS vs SVLPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SVLPF's competition here
BVERS vs EVGPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while EVGPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check EVGPF's competition here
BVERS vs ENTOF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ENTOF's competition here
BVERS vs FBGBY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to FBGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check FBGBY's competition here
BVERS vs MEQYF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MEQYF trades at $134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MEQYF's competition here
BVERS vs SVAUF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SVAUF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SVAUF's competition here
BVERS vs ACNDF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ACNDF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ACNDF's competition here
BVERS vs VIBVY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to VIBVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check VIBVY's competition here
BVERS vs ICHIF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ICHIF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ICHIF's competition here
BVERS vs HYSNY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 988.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while HYSNY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 385.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check HYSNY's competition here
BVERS vs GRMHF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check GRMHF's competition here
BVERS vs RLHPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to RLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check RLHPF's competition here
BVERS vs SSHLF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 874.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SSHLF's competition here
BVERS vs MMHTF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MMHTF's competition here
BVERS vs PTLKF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check PTLKF's competition here
BVERS vs SSHLY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SSHLY trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SSHLY's competition here
BVERS vs GBCEY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to GBCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check GBCEY's competition here
BVERS vs KWLGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to KWLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check KWLGF's competition here
BVERS vs JPPSF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to JPPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check JPPSF's competition here
BVERS vs SHMSF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SHMSF's competition here
BVERS vs DLMI Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while DLMI trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check DLMI's competition here
BVERS vs AGGHF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, AGGHF has a market cap of 363.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while AGGHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGHF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AGGHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to AGGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check AGGHF's competition here
BVERS vs LSLPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while LSLPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check LSLPF's competition here
BVERS vs SOHOF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SOHOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SOHOF's competition here
BVERS vs MDTWF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to MDTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MDTWF's competition here
BVERS vs MDPCF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to MDPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MDPCF's competition here
BVERS vs FXTGY Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check FXTGY's competition here
BVERS vs NTPIF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while NTPIF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check NTPIF's competition here
BVERS vs SDWHF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to SDWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check SDWHF's competition here
BVERS vs FCRIF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to FCRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check FCRIF's competition here
BVERS vs MRFGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to MRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MRFGF's competition here
BVERS vs TPRP Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while TPRP trades at $21,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 454.55. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check TPRP's competition here
BVERS vs BREUF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while BREUF trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check BREUF's competition here
BVERS vs AZLCZ Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while AZLCZ trades at $1,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check AZLCZ's competition here
BVERS vs PKTEF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while PKTEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -44.01. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check PKTEF's competition here
BVERS vs OJOC Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check OJOC's competition here
BVERS vs MHIVF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MHIVF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MHIVF's competition here
BVERS vs CPTP Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CPTP trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CPTP's competition here
BVERS vs CRSS Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check CRSS's competition here
BVERS vs TNHDF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to TNHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check TNHDF's competition here
BVERS vs ADPPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ADPPF's competition here
BVERS vs MDICF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to MDICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MDICF's competition here
BVERS vs LGYSF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to LGYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check LGYSF's competition here
BVERS vs ABCP Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ABCP trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ABCP's competition here
BVERS vs MNGGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MNGGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MNGGF's competition here
BVERS vs ASPZ Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ASPZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ASPZ's competition here
BVERS vs DIVVZ Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to DIVVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check DIVVZ's competition here
BVERS vs BCKMF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to BCKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check BCKMF's competition here
BVERS vs ATTGF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ATTGF's competition here
BVERS vs TRPTF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while TRPTF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to TRPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check TRPTF's competition here
BVERS vs MGAG Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MGAG's competition here
BVERS vs ADHLF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check ADHLF's competition here
BVERS vs PCPDF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check PCPDF's competition here
BVERS vs MHPC Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MHPC has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MHPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHPC's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MHPC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MHPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MHPC's competition here
BVERS vs PRPPF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is more volatile compared to PRPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check PRPPF's competition here
BVERS vs MSGNF Comparison July 2025
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 75.9M. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,050.02, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.Check MSGNF's competition here