Beaver Coal Company, Limited
Beaver Coal Company, Limited BVERS Peers
See (BVERS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BVERS | $3,400.00 | -5.56% | 84.59M | N/A | N/A | +8.24% |
| VNNVF | $33.75 | +15.58% | 27.77B | -33.42 | -$1.01 | N/A |
| CLNXF | $38.15 | +0.37% | 26.92B | -544.96 | -$0.07 | +0.19% |
| VONOY | $16.27 | -2.02% | 26.77B | -32.53 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | N/A | 20.60B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +3.55% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | N/A | 20.26B | 40.06 | $1.00 | +3.28% |
| SURDF | $35.04 | -14.96% | 16.49B | 12.60 | $2.78 | +1.36% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +30.26% | 16.00B | 12.23 | $1.39 | N/A |
| SWPFF | $2.05 | +28.93% | 11.83B | -102.50 | -$0.02 | +6.89% |
| SWPRF | $135.16 | N/A | 10.84B | 25.17 | $5.37 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
BVERS vs VNNVF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 27.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while VNNVF trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -33.42. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CLNXF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 26.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CLNXF trades at $38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -544.96. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and CLNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs VONOY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 26.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while VONOY trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -32.53. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs VTAGY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and VTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs VTWRF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SURDF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 16.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SURDF trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SURYY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 16.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SWPFF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SWPFF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SWPRF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs IFSUF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 10.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while IFSUF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CLILF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CLILF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs AZRGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and AZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs WRFRF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while WRFRF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 61.88. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs HULCF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while HULCF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs ESRCF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ESRCF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs NXDCF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while NXDCF trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -143.71. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs LEGIF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while LEGIF trades at $83.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 84.79. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SCOTF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs NMEHF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while NMEHF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and NMEHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs HLPPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while HLPPF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and HLPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs SSSAF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SSSAF trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs HLPPY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while HLPPY trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CWSRF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CWSRF trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 86.07. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and CWSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs TYTMF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while TYTMF trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SSHLY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SSHLY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs FBGBY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and FBGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs AANNF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while AANNF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and AANNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs IWGFF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while IWGFF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs VGPBF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while VGPBF trades at $92.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CTRGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CTRGF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CGSHY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and CGSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs TAGOF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while TAGOF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs FBGGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CNPPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CNPPF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs ENTOF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs GRGTF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while GRGTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and GRGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs TAGYY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and TAGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs WIHLY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and WIHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs SRRLF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SRRLF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs ASGTF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ASGTF trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 505.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ASGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs GRNNF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while GRNNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs GRDDY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SVLPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SVLPF trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs DUSCF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and DUSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs HYSNF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs LGMMY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and LGMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs ICHIF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ICHIF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and ICHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs MEQYF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MEQYF trades at $138.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MEQYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs EVGPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while EVGPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs VIBVY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and VIBVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs SVAUF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SVAUF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -40.09. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs GRMHF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and GRMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs ACNDF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 977.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ACNDF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs RLHPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and RLHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs HYSNY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 846.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while HYSNY trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 329.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MMHTF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs PTLKF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 708.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SSHLF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 513.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs GBCEY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and GBCEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs KWLGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and KWLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs JPPSF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and JPPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs SHMSF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SHMSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and SHMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs LSLPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 387.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while LSLPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MDTWF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 323.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MDTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs SOHOF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 311.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SOHOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs FXTGY Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 256.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while FXTGY trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MDPCF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MDPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs NTPIF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 250.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while NTPIF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs SDWHF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and SDWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs RNHEF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs FCRIF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and FCRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs TPRP Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 153.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while TPRP trades at $25,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 463.64. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and TPRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs MRFGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs DLMI Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 140.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while DLMI trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MSGNF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 135.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs BREUF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 102.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while BREUF trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.64. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs AZLCZ Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 96.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while AZLCZ trades at $1,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs OJOC Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs CRSS Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MHIVF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 73.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MHIVF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MHIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs CPTP Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 64.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while CPTP trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and CPTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs PKTEF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 60.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while PKTEF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs ADPPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ADPPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and ADPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs TNHDF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 39.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and TNHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs MDICF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MDICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs LGYSF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and LGYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs ABCP Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 26.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ABCP trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs PCPDF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 23.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while PCPDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs ADHLF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 21.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MNGGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 19.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MNGGF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs DIVVZ Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and DIVVZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs BCKMF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and BCKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs ATTGF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs TRPTF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while TRPTF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to TRPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs MGAG Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MGAG trades at $300.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs WETH Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while WETH trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs ASPZ Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 9.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while ASPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS is less volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVERS.
BVERS vs PRPPF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and PRPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVERS vs MBHCF Comparison
BVERS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVERS stands at 84.59M. In comparison, MBHCF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BVERS is priced at $3,400.00, while MBHCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBHCF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BVERS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MBHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVERS and MBHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).