Blockchain Venture Capital Inc.
Blockchain Venture Capital Inc. BVCI.CN Peers
See (BVCI.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
BVCI.CN vs MSFT.NE Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 4.64T. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while MSFT.NE trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs PANW.NE Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 172.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while PANW.NE trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 108.38. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs NVEI.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while NVEI.TO trades at $47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and NVEI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs BB.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while BB.TO trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is -496.00. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs TIXT.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 976.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while TIXT.TO trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs CPLF.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while CPLF.TO trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs CVO.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 607.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while CVO.TO trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs DND.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 599.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while DND.TO trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs STC.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 268.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while STC.TO trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -28.54. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs TC.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 247.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while TC.TO trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs PAY.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while PAY.TO trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs GIVX.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while GIVX.TO trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and GIVX.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs HAI.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 122.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while HAI.TO trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 54.75. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs NC.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while NC.CN trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and NC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs RAIL.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 53.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while RAIL.CN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs MOGO.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 36.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while MOGO.TO trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs PACT.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while PACT.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and PACT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs SCPE.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 17.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while SCPE.CN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs CYBT.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 16.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while CYBT.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs HANK.V Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while HANK.V trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs ICS.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 12.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while ICS.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +9.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs IP.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 9.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while IP.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs NFTX.NE Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while NFTX.NE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs OPT.TO Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 7.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while OPT.TO trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and OPT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs PKK.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 6.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while PKK.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs EONX.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 6.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while EONX.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN is less volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BVCI.CN.
BVCI.CN vs PERK.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while PERK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and PERK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs SCYB.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while SCYB.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and SCYB.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs MBLM.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while MBLM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and MBLM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs DSAI.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while DSAI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and DSAI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs HRO.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while HRO.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and HRO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs APP.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while APP.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and APP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs BYND.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while BYND.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and BYND.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs AMPD.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601665.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while AMPD.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and AMPD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs SQID.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72084.00. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while SQID.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BVCI.CN and SQID.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BVCI.CN vs TAAL.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, TAAL.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while TAAL.CN trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BVCI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
BVCI.CN vs VPN.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, VPN.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while VPN.CN trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BVCI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and VPN.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
BVCI.CN vs EAP.CN Comparison
BVCI.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BVCI.CN stands at 3.09M. In comparison, EAP.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BVCI.CN is priced at $0.11, while EAP.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BVCI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, BVCI.CN's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BVCI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT.NE | $31.54 | +0.19% | 4.64T | 32.52 | $0.97 | +1.01% |
| PANW.NE | $22.76 | +0.22% | 172.65B | 108.38 | $0.21 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | $47.61 | N/A | 6.81B | 216.41 | $0.22 | +0.87% |
| BB.TO | $4.96 | +3.33% | 2.96B | -496.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | $3.49 | -1.97% | 976.51M | -7.43 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | $11.99 | +0.08% | 943.51M | -49.96 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | $6.30 | +1.12% | 607.25M | -42.00 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| DND.TO | $8.92 | +1.25% | 599.42M | -3.63 | -$2.46 | +0.84% |
| STC.TO | $7.99 | +0.50% | 268.42M | -28.54 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| TC.TO | $22.37 | +0.58% | 247.00M | -1.62 | -$13.82 | N/A |