Burnham Holdings, Inc.
Burnham Holdings, Inc. BURCA Peers
See (BURCA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BURCA | $24.60 | -1.09% | 90.1M | 9.65 | $2.55 | +4.63% |
| CODGF | $117.95 | +1.59% | 58.6B | 17.98 | $6.56 | +1.94% |
| CODYY | $23.31 | -1.56% | 57.9B | 17.79 | $1.31 | +2.10% |
| DKILY | $12.45 | +1.65% | 36.4B | 20.40 | $0.61 | +1.35% |
| DKILF | $118.55 | -5.62% | 34.7B | 19.18 | $6.18 | +1.79% |
| GBERY | $77.55 | +0.42% | 25.6B | 34.62 | $2.24 | +2.00% |
| GBERF | $759.53 | N/A | 24.1B | 33.53 | $22.65 | +2.15% |
| KGSPF | $84.17 | N/A | 15.3B | 19.95 | $4.22 | +1.05% |
| KGSPY | $83.89 | -1.39% | 15.3B | 19.88 | $4.22 | +1.08% |
| BLHWF | $963.02 | N/A | 11.8B | 64.50 | $14.93 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
BURCA vs CODGF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while CODGF trades at $117.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and CODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs CODYY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while CODYY trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs DKILY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while DKILY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs DKILF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while DKILF trades at $118.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs GBERY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, GBERY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while GBERY trades at $77.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas GBERY's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBERY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to GBERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs GBERF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, GBERF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while GBERF trades at $759.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas GBERF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBERF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to GBERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs KGSPF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while KGSPF trades at $84.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs KGSPY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while KGSPY trades at $83.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs BLHWF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, BLHWF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while BLHWF trades at $963.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas BLHWF's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLHWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to BLHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs NIABY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NIABY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while NIABY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas NIABY's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to NIABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs NDRBF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while NDRBF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to NDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs RKWAF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to RKWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs RKWBF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while RKWBF trades at $45.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and RKWBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs TOTDY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while TOTDY trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs FGSGF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while FGSGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to FGSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs JSGCF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and JSGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs JSGRY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while JSGRY trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 227.20. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs SNWAF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while SNWAF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and SNWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs CSRLF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs UPNRY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs UPNRF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and UPNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs RLLWF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while RLLWF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to RLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs TPRKY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while TPRKY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs FBOHY Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, FBOHY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while FBOHY trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas FBOHY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBOHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and FBOHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs TVPKF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while TVPKF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and TVPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs FBOHF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, FBOHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while FBOHF trades at $840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas FBOHF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBOHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to FBOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs SCWTF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, SCWTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while SCWTF trades at $768.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas SCWTF's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to SCWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs VLUTF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 910.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and VLUTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs LPUSF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and LPUSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs NRTZF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while NRTZF trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs PLSNF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and PLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs MCCK Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 351.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while MCCK trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs ECELF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while ECELF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and ECELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs BURCB Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BURCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and BURCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs WHWRF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs LGNC Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while LGNC trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to LGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs OATN Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while OATN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OATN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to OATN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs UPIPF Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and UPIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs ZHUD Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 160.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while ZHUD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA is less volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BURCA.
BURCA vs LPPI Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and LPPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BURCA vs AFIIQ Comparison
BURCA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BURCA stands at 90.1M. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BURCA is priced at $24.60, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BURCA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.65, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BURCA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BURCA and AFIIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).