MicroSectors Solactive FANG Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FIYY trades at $103.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FIYY's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FFEU trades at $90.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FFEU's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VTIP trades at $50.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VTIP's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VTAPX trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VTAPX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VFSTX trades at $10.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VFSTX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VFSUX trades at $10.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VFSUX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VGSH trades at $58.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VGSH's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VSBSX trades at $19.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VSBSX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VWSTX trades at $15.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VWSTX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while MINT trades at $100.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check MINT's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while ASBFX trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check ASBFX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SCHO trades at $24.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SCHO's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while PTSHX trades at $9.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check PTSHX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FTSM trades at $60.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FTSM's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VFISX trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VFISX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SPTS trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SPTS's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SPXL trades at $188.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SPXL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TMF trades at $36.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TMF's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while JSDHX trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check JSDHX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VSGBX trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VSGBX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while VSGDX trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check VSGDX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TECL trades at $102.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TECL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FLVCX trades at $44.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FLVCX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while BITX trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check BITX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FAS trades at $177.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FAS's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TBLL trades at $105.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TBLL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FSTTX trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FSTTX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DIAYX trades at $30.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DIAYX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DHLSX trades at $29.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DHLSX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DHFCX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FNGU trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FNGU's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while PAIAX trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check PAIAX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DWT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DWT's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check ORSTX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while PRFSX trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check PRFSX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SOXS trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SOXS's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while ACSNX trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check ACSNX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while BASOX trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check BASOX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while CPLSX trades at $17.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check CPLSX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while RYCCX trades at $439.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check RYCCX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while RYVLX trades at $627.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check RYVLX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while RYVYX trades at $626.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check RYVYX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SH trades at $38.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SH's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 789.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TAFI trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TAFI's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while EXMAX trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check EXMAX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while EMAIX trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check EMAIX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 664.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TUA trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TUA's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 650.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while JSCP trades at $47.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check JSCP's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 648.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while NVDX trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check NVDX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while GDXU trades at $76.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check GDXU's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 603M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DPST trades at $96.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DPST's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while NUGT trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check NUGT's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 564.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FNGO trades at $111.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 38.24. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FNGO's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 543M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while GIYAX trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check GIYAX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while UVXY trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check UVXY's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while BPRRX trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check BPRRX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while BPIRX trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check BPIRX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while PSQ trades at $32.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check PSQ's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DXQLX trades at $104.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DXQLX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 500.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SPXU trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SPXU's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DGAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DGAZ's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FSMB trades at $19.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FSMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FSMB's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 411.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SDHY trades at $16.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SDHY's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SPXS trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SPXS's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SDS trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SDS's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while GGLL trades at $41.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check GGLL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SEMRX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FSHSX trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FSHSX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while AAPU trades at $23.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check AAPU's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while NAIL trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check NAIL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while KOLD trades at $30.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check KOLD's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while MRRL trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check MRRL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DUST trades at $22.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DUST's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while JNUG trades at $79.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check JNUG's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 301.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TZA trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TZA's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FLGE trades at $809.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FLGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FLGE's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while DFEN trades at $59.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check DFEN's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while MORL trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check MORL's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SVXY trades at $45.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SVXY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SVXY's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SMB trades at $17.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SMB's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while AMZU trades at $40.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check AMZU's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SVIX trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SVIX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while QID trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check QID's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while STOT trades at $47.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check STOT's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while GUSH trades at $23.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check GUSH's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FTSD trades at $90.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FTSD's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TENG trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TENG's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 228.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while ERX trades at $53.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check ERX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 212.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while UUP trades at $27.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check UUP's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while REML trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to REML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check REML's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while FUMB trades at $20.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check FUMB's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TWUSX trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TWUSX's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while SDOW trades at $39.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check SDOW's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while CLSE trades at $23.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check CLSE's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while EMNT trades at $98.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check EMNT's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while TMV trades at $39.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check TMV's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while CVSB trades at $50.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check CVSB's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PULT has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while PULT trades at $50.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas PULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to PULT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to PULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check PULT's competition here

BULZ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BULZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULZ is priced at $186.10, while USDU trades at $26.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BULZ currently has a P/E ratio of 62.11, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULZ's ROE is N/A, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULZ is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULZ.Check USDU's competition here