Bullet Blockchain, Inc.
Bullet Blockchain, Inc. BULT Peers
See (BULT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULT | $0.04 | +8.68% | 15.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | N/A | 114.1B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +16.43% |
| CIIHY | $27.70 | -2.43% | 57.1B | 13.19 | $2.10 | +3.62% |
| MQBKY | $138.11 | -1.69% | 53.2B | 19.24 | $7.18 | +2.97% |
| MCQEF | $140.85 | +2.00% | 51.4B | 19.59 | $7.19 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $2.55 | N/A | 47.3B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.93% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | N/A | 38B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +4.53% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.20% |
| NRSCF | $5.80 | N/A | 17.1B | 7.53 | $0.77 | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
BULT vs IBKKF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs HAITY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CIIHY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CIIHY trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs MQBKY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while MQBKY trades at $138.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs MCQEF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while MCQEF trades at $140.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CIIHF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs GUOSF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs HTNGF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs NRSCF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while NRSCF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CMSQF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CMSQF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CMSQY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CMSQY trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs HUATF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CNICF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DSEEY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DSEEY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DSECF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DSECF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs WSOUF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BRPHF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs IVTJF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs IGGHY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while IGGHY trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs IVTJY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs IGGRF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CLPE Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CGXYY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs LTSAP Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while LTSAP trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs TCAPF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while TCAPF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs PLSQF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs LTSA Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs NHMAF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs FNNTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs MAUSY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs MNXBF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DEFTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CFNCF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CBGPF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs LKADF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CBGPY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 738.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CBGPY trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CCORF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 711.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CCORF trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -31.55. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CNSRF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 653.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CNSRF trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs PHIG Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while PHIG trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs PHIGW Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 583.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs NAGGF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CESTY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs ABGSF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CESTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CYFRF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 280.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CYFRF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 168.99. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs ABIT Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while ABIT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs APPCF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs OSHDF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CSCHF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs NPPTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while NPPTF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs PNPFF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while PNPFF trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CAGPF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs OZFRY Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs STGC Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs GEVI Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while GEVI trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs HAFG Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while HAFG trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CURN Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CURN trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 43.15. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs XAUMF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while XAUMF trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DGTLF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs ARCNF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs UFFRF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CBTTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DMGGF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DMGGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BBKCF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CMZZF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DYNA Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CRMZ Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CRMZ trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CFLSF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs EBML Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs ARBKF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs FDCT Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while FDCT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs SMURF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BCNWF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BCNWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs FWAV Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs AVFCF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DPXCF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs ABSOF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs MATEF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs TRAA Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs HYHDF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while HYHDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs FFTTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BTCWF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BTCWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs IHLDF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while IHLDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs ITEX Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while ITEX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BLVDF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs AAMTF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CCPUF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CCPUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CSTXF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs VTXB Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VTXB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while VTXB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTXB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to VTXB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to VTXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs PHIL Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs DBKSF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while DBKSF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BZRD Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CRKR Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is more volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BKBLF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs GBCHF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BKLIF Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs FNDM Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs CBTC Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.
BULT vs BLQC Comparison
BULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BULT stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BULT is priced at $0.04, while BLQC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BULT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BULT's ROE is +4.92%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BULT is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BULT.