Britvic plc
Britvic plc BTVCF Peers
See (BTVCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTVCF | $16.40 | +15.09% | 4.1B | 26.89 | $0.61 | +2.26% |
| NNFSF | $5.03 | +0.00% | 56.6B | 33.53 | $0.15 | +4.33% |
| CCHGY | $54.40 | +0.68% | 19.8B | 20.61 | $2.64 | +2.08% |
| CCHBF | $52.65 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 20.10 | $2.62 | +6.19% |
| EMBVF | $10.38 | -2.28% | 17.6B | 14.84 | $0.70 | +2.92% |
| ITONF | $61.41 | +0.00% | 12.7B | 87.73 | $0.70 | +2.55% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.03% |
| YKLTY | $8.84 | -3.81% | 5.2B | 17.33 | $0.51 | +1.52% |
| YKLTF | $17.79 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 17.44 | $1.02 | +1.19% |
| COCSF | $9.18 | -2.29% | 4.6B | 15.04 | $0.61 | +3.60% |
Stock Comparison
BTVCF vs NNFSF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while NNFSF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs CCHGY Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while CCHGY trades at $54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs CCHBF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while CCHBF trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs EMBVF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while EMBVF trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs ITONF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs BTVCY Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs YKLTY Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while YKLTY trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs YKLTF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while YKLTF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs COCSF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while COCSF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs UNPSF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs CCOJY Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while CCOJY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 105.71. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs CCOJF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs ITOEF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs YNAJF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while YNAJF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs OSOPF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs FQVTF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while FQVTF trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs LSDAF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while LSDAF trades at $157.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs BAGFF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs NJMVF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs HAATF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while HAATF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs UPCHY Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while UPCHY trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs CHFHY Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs PDPG Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs JSDA Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while JSDA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs MOJO Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while MOJO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs KRTL Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while KRTL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs HIRU Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs RVBR Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while RVBR trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs FLWBF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs APRU Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs DRNK Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs PLVFF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs RMHB Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs PURT Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs INKW Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs AQPW Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while AQPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs ALKM Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs DNDT Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 645.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while DNDT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs FBEC Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 585.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs FMBV Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FMBV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs HSEEF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs VGID Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs NTEI Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 272K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while NTEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs ASII Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 265.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs KGKG Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs FHBC Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs HFBG Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 197K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs DNAX Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs GHMP Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs MLHC Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs TBEV Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 79.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs EQLB Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 71.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs NBVG Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs STZU Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs PPBV Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs FGFT Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs BGEM Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs BVNNF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs KRED Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs SWRI Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs HKBV Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs MCHA Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs BBDA Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs AQUI Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs ABVG Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs RMIL Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs CLCL Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.
BTVCF vs GGGRF Comparison
BTVCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTVCF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTVCF is priced at $16.40, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTVCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.89, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTVCF's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTVCF is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTVCF.