BTS Group Holdings Public Company Limited
BTS Group Holdings Public Company Limited (BTSGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTSGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTSGY | $3.08 | +0.00% | 495.7M | 6.55 | $0.47 | N/A |
| EJPRY | $11.26 | +3.49% | 25.5B | 16.79 | $0.67 | +1.06% |
| EJPRF | $21.44 | +0.00% | 24.3B | 16.00 | $1.34 | +1.91% |
| CJPRY | $12.07 | +4.05% | 23.7B | 7.73 | $1.57 | +0.54% |
| MTRJF | $3.80 | +7.65% | 23.6B | 11.88 | $0.32 | +4.43% |
| MTCPY | $11.16 | +0.00% | 23.1B | 11.51 | $0.97 | +4.53% |
| CJPRF | $22.56 | +0.00% | 22B | 7.18 | $3.14 | +0.47% |
| VOSSY | $10.61 | +0.00% | 20.5B | 29.48 | $0.36 | +1.15% |
| WJRYF | $24.14 | +2.67% | 11.4B | 14.90 | $1.62 | +2.34% |
| WJRYY | $22.90 | +4.84% | 10.7B | 14.09 | $1.62 | +1.55% |
Stock Comparison
BTSGY vs EJPRY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, EJPRY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while EJPRY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas EJPRY's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EJPRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to EJPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check EJPRY's competition here
BTSGY vs EJPRF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, EJPRF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while EJPRF trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas EJPRF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EJPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to EJPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check EJPRF's competition here
BTSGY vs CJPRY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, CJPRY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while CJPRY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CJPRY's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CJPRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to CJPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check CJPRY's competition here
BTSGY vs MTRJF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, MTRJF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while MTRJF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MTRJF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MTRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to MTRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check MTRJF's competition here
BTSGY vs MTCPY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, MTCPY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while MTCPY trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MTCPY's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MTCPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to MTCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check MTCPY's competition here
BTSGY vs CJPRF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, CJPRF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while CJPRF trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CJPRF's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CJPRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to CJPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check CJPRF's competition here
BTSGY vs VOSSY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, VOSSY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while VOSSY trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas VOSSY's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VOSSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to VOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check VOSSY's competition here
BTSGY vs WJRYF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, WJRYF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while WJRYF trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas WJRYF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WJRYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to WJRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check WJRYF's competition here
BTSGY vs WJRYY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, WJRYY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while WJRYY trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas WJRYY's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WJRYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to WJRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check WJRYY's competition here
BTSGY vs AOMFF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, AOMFF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while AOMFF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AOMFF's P/E ratio is 63.89. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AOMFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to AOMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check AOMFF's competition here
BTSGY vs ALSMY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, ALSMY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while ALSMY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ALSMY's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALSMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to ALSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check ALSMY's competition here
BTSGY vs GRPTF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, GRPTF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while GRPTF trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GRPTF's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRPTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to GRPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check GRPTF's competition here
BTSGY vs GRPTY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, GRPTY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while GRPTY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GRPTY's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRPTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to GRPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check GRPTY's competition here
BTSGY vs GMXTF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, GMXTF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while GMXTF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GMXTF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMXTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to GMXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check GMXTF's competition here
BTSGY vs CRYYF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, CRYYF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while CRYYF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CRYYF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRYYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to CRYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check CRYYF's competition here
BTSGY vs RUMOF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, RUMOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while RUMOF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RUMOF's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RUMOF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to RUMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check RUMOF's competition here
BTSGY vs ZHUZF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, ZHUZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while ZHUZF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ZHUZF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZHUZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to ZHUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check ZHUZF's competition here
BTSGY vs CRYCY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, CRYCY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while CRYCY trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CRYCY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRYCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to CRYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check CRYCY's competition here
BTSGY vs GNGYF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, GNGYF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while GNGYF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GNGYF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GNGYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to GNGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check GNGYF's competition here
BTSGY vs KELRF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, KELRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while KELRF trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas KELRF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KELRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to KELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check KELRF's competition here
BTSGY vs ODERF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, ODERF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while ODERF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ODERF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ODERF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to ODERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check ODERF's competition here
BTSGY vs TBURF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, TBURF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while TBURF trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TBURF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TBURF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to TBURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check TBURF's competition here
BTSGY vs QRNNF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, QRNNF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while QRNNF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas QRNNF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QRNNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to QRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check QRNNF's competition here
BTSGY vs SRAIF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, SRAIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while SRAIF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SRAIF's P/E ratio is 58.51. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SRAIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to SRAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check SRAIF's competition here
BTSGY vs BTGRF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, BTGRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while BTGRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BTGRF's P/E ratio is -15.28. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BTGRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to BTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check BTGRF's competition here
BTSGY vs BKKXF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, BKKXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while BKKXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BKKXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BKKXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to BKKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check BKKXF's competition here
BTSGY vs CDGLY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, CDGLY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while CDGLY trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CDGLY's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDGLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to CDGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check CDGLY's competition here
BTSGY vs CDGLF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, CDGLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while CDGLF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CDGLF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDGLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to CDGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check CDGLF's competition here
BTSGY vs FGROY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, FGROY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while FGROY trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas FGROY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FGROY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to FGROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check FGROY's competition here
BTSGY vs VOSSF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, VOSSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while VOSSF trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas VOSSF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VOSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to VOSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check VOSSF's competition here
BTSGY vs FGROF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, FGROF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while FGROF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas FGROF's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FGROF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to FGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check FGROF's competition here
BTSGY vs ZHUZY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, ZHUZY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while ZHUZY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ZHUZY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZHUZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to ZHUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check ZHUZY's competition here
BTSGY vs JFBHF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, JFBHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while JFBHF trades at $251.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas JFBHF's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JFBHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to JFBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check JFBHF's competition here
BTSGY vs GRPOF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, GRPOF has a market cap of 517.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while GRPOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GRPOF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRPOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to GRPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check GRPOF's competition here
BTSGY vs GLTVF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, GLTVF has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while GLTVF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GLTVF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GLTVF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to GLTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check GLTVF's competition here
BTSGY vs NXPGF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, NXPGF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while NXPGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NXPGF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NXPGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to NXPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check NXPGF's competition here
BTSGY vs DMRRP Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, DMRRP has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while DMRRP trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DMRRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DMRRP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to DMRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check DMRRP's competition here
BTSGY vs AWRY Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, AWRY has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while AWRY trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AWRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AWRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to AWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check AWRY's competition here
BTSGY vs DMRR Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, DMRR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while DMRR trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DMRR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to DMRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check DMRR's competition here
BTSGY vs USDP Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, USDP has a market cap of 236.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while USDP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas USDP's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to USDP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to USDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check USDP's competition here
BTSGY vs MAGP Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, MAGP has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while MAGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to MAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check MAGP's competition here
BTSGY vs RLPHQ Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, RLPHQ has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while RLPHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RLPHQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RLPHQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is less volatile compared to RLPHQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check RLPHQ's competition here
BTSGY vs URAL Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, URAL has a market cap of 39. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while URAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas URAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to URAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to URAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check URAL's competition here
BTSGY vs BVZHF Comparison August 2025
BTSGY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTSGY stands at 495.7M. In comparison, BVZHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTSGY is priced at $3.08, while BVZHF trades at $792.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTSGY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BVZHF's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, BTSGY's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BVZHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTSGY is more volatile compared to BVZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTSGY.Check BVZHF's competition here