Bitcoin Generation Inc.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 195.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS trades at $121.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 191.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PE trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 191.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PI trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 191.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PF trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 191.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PK trades at $22.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 190.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PA trades at $21.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 174.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GS-PA trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 173.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GS trades at $566.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 173.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GS-PD trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 172.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GS-PC trades at $22.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 157.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 153.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SCHW trades at $84.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 78.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IBKR trades at $185.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 50.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MQBKY trades at $132.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CIIHY trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 48.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PQ trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PP trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TW trades at $147.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PL trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RJF trades at $145.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LPLA trades at $360.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.63B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NMR trades at $5.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HUATF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CMSQY trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FUTU trades at $102.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HLI trades at $173.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CNICF trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HAITY trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while JEF trades at $50.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while XP trades at $17.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SF-PB trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FRHC trades at $156.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SF trades at $91.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DSECF trades at $6.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and DSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DSEEY trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MKTX trades at $231.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while EVR trades at $216.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BRPHF trades at $19.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MARA trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RJF-PB trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and IGGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BGC trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PIPR trades at $251.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SNEX trades at $88.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CLPE trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MC trades at $54.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LAZ trades at $42.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while VIRT trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PJT trades at $144.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MRX trades at $47.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LTSAP trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and LTSAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CLSKW trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SF-PC trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LTSA trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SF-PD trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BGCP trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGCP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TIGR trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IREN trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PWP trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -84.19. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HKIB trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DFIN trades at $53.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HUT trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DEFTF trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while WULF trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CIFR trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while COWN trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 775.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while AC trades at $36.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LKADF trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 666.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CBGPY trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 654.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CCORF trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 636.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while OPY trades at $61.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 592.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FUFU trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PHIG trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and PHIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 547.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BITF trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 520.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 496.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while AMRK trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 423.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BTBT trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 392.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CYFRF trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 85.33. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 387.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MFH trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CESTY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CESTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 290.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HIVE trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CESTF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GHL trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while APPCF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 199.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PROP trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 190.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ABIT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 171.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NPPTF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 143.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while WHG trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 382.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 133.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PNPFF trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 133.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CIFRW trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while STGC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SRL trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 108.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BTM trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTM's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 95.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SIEB trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CURN trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TCJH trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 81.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GEVI trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while XAUMF trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DYNA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 72.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HGBL trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GRDI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HAFG trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and HAFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BTCS trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 46.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 44.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TOP trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MDBH trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SDIG trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and SDIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 36.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GRYP trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DMGGF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PLUT trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SWIN trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 25.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 25.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BBKCF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while EBML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and ARBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 23.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ARBK trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SMURF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ABTS trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SAI trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while COHN trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 15.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while WAI trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BULT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BULT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FWAV trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 14.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GREE trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 12.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and AVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 11.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FDCT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MIGI trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIGI's ROE of -14.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 10.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GSIW trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 10.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MATEF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ATIF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ITEX trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and ITEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MEGL trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and IHLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CSTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HYHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and AAMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PHIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NCPL trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BZRD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BIDCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BIDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CRKR trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and DBKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PIHG trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while IFXY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NSAV has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NSAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSAV's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NSAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TRAA trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and TRAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FNDM trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CBTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TRAC has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TRAC trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAC's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and TRAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HAON has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HAON trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAON's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, EQOSQ has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while EQOSQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQOSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQOSQ's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and EQOSQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GRNBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and GRNBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, GMPW has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while GMPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMPW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMPW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to GMPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BKLLF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BKLLF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLLF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKLLF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BKLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MGTI has a market cap of 996268.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MGTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGTI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGTI's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and MGTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MXLGF has a market cap of 964416.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MXLGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXLGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MXLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SAITW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MNTR has a market cap of 954188.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MNTR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTR's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNTR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 927445.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BEGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 927153.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BLQC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ICOA has a market cap of 848342.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ICOA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICOA's ROE of +64.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and ICOA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MGHL has a market cap of 726109.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MGHL trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGHL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGHL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to MGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CSOL has a market cap of 702311.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CSOL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSOL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CSOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 643962.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HIPH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 480031.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CCTL has a market cap of 373483.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CCTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCTL's ROE of -7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and CCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, JTBK has a market cap of 369253.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while JTBK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JTBK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and JTBK have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BYSD has a market cap of 367954.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BYSD trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYSD's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYSD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BYSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RDWD has a market cap of 340331.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RDWD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDWD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to RDWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, KGRI has a market cap of 317935.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while KGRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGRI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to KGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LNTO has a market cap of 317503.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LNTO trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNTO's ROE of +18.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LNTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BFCH has a market cap of 241318.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BFCH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFCH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BFCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CBYI has a market cap of 238986.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CBYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBYI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CBYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SOHL has a market cap of 228215.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SOHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and SOHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, JMON has a market cap of 175903.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while JMON trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to JMON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HYBOF has a market cap of 122760.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HYBOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYBOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HYBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BITCF has a market cap of 121405.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BITCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITCF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BITCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LFAP has a market cap of 117989.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LFAP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFAP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RGST has a market cap of 85571.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RGST trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to RGST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, VNTN has a market cap of 84884.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while VNTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to VNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, TWCI has a market cap of 57476.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while TWCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWCI's ROE of +9.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and TWCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, CNXS has a market cap of 52661.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while CNXS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to CNXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NODC has a market cap of 42613.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NODC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NODC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 40669.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LGHL trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, UMFG has a market cap of 36754.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while UMFG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMFG's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UMFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to UMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, VTXB has a market cap of 32175.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while VTXB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTXB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and VTXB have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, AXTG has a market cap of 24479.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while AXTG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and AXTG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BGMO has a market cap of 22777.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BGMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGMO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and BGMO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RAFFF has a market cap of 11417.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RAFFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAFFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and RAFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, UCSO has a market cap of 8373.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while UCSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UCSO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to UCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, WDBG has a market cap of 8325.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while WDBG trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDBG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDBG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to WDBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, RMTN has a market cap of 6049.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while RMTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMTN's ROE of +4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and RMTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NTFL has a market cap of 6034.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NTFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTFL's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and NTFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, OFSI has a market cap of 5112.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while OFSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFSI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OFSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to OFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, ATCC has a market cap of 2677.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while ATCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to ATCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BLPFF has a market cap of 1194.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BLPFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLPFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLPFF's ROE of -17.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 817.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while STSSW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, EZTD has a market cap of 520.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while EZTD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EZTD's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and EZTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, MERR has a market cap of 456.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while MERR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MERR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and MERR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, WSFL has a market cap of 274.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while WSFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSFL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to WSFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, SYSX has a market cap of 248.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while SYSX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYSX's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and SYSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, JRJCY has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while JRJCY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRJCY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRJCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to JRJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, HVBT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while HVBT trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HVBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to HVBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LEHLQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LEHLQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEHLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEHLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and LEHLQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, JMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while JMP trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to JMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PWPPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PWPPW trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWPPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PWPPW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and PWPPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, JRJC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while JRJC trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRJC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRJC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to JRJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, BETS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while BETS trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to BETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DSRO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DSRO trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSRO's P/E ratio is -99.60. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSRO's ROE of +30.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and DSRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, PIEJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while PIEJF trades at $39.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIEJF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIEJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and PIEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, XPVVV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while XPVVV trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPVVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XPVVV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and XPVVV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LHHMQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LHHMQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHHMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHHMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and LHHMQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, LEHNQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while LEHNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEHNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEHNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and LEHNQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, FLTDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while FLTDF trades at $23.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLTDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLTDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN and FLTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, EQOS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while EQOS trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQOS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to EQOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, DPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while DPW trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPW's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to DPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.

BTGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BTGN stands at 25361.00. In comparison, NILE-PD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BTGN is priced at $0.00, while NILE-PD trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BTGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILE-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTGN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NILE-PD's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BTGN is less volatile compared to NILE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTGN.