Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. BTC.CN Peers
See (BTC.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC.CN | $0.16 | +6.67% | 9.46M | -1.45 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| GS.NE | $29.81 | -1.97% | 259.63B | 13.61 | $2.19 | +2.73% |
| GLXY.TO | $30.52 | -3.08% | 10.57B | 39.64 | $0.77 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | $23.42 | -2.21% | 2.44B | -25.46 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | $5.25 | +0.96% | 1.72B | -40.38 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| CF-PC.TO | $22.52 | N/A | 974.03M | 10.43 | $2.16 | +3.61% |
| CF.TO | $9.47 | -0.32% | 970.95M | -26.31 | -$0.36 | +3.61% |
| BITF.TO | $1.56 | -2.50% | 867.30M | -8.67 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | $3.90 | +6.27% | 597.30M | 97.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | $18.27 | -4.25% | 171.50M | 5.37 | $3.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BTC.CN vs GS.NE Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 259.63B. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while GS.NE trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs GLXY.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while GLXY.TO trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs HUT.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while HUT.TO trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -25.46. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs DEFI.NE Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while DEFI.NE trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is -40.38. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs CF-PC.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 974.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while CF-PC.TO trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs CF.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 970.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while CF.TO trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -26.31. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs BITF.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 867.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while BITF.TO trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs HODL.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 597.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while HODL.CN trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs PNP.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 171.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while PNP.TO trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs RICH.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while RICH.CN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs CXI.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 130.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while CXI.TO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs XAU.TO Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 107.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while XAU.TO trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs BIGG.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while BIGG.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs FRNT.V Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while FRNT.V trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs HOLD.NE Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 11.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while HOLD.NE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs SPIR.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 7.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while SPIR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs ARM.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while ARM.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs CODE.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while CODE.CN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.
BTC.CN vs GBC.CN Comparison
BTC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTC.CN stands at 9.46M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BTC.CN is priced at $0.16, while GBC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.45, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BTC.CN's ROE is -2.86%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTC.CN is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTC.CN.