Black Swan Graphene Inc.
Black Swan Graphene Inc. (BSWGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BSWGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSWGF | $1.02 | -0.97% | 40.9M | -11.29 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| SHECY | $14.62 | -1.02% | 55.5B | 16.04 | $0.91 | +1.53% |
| SHECF | $29.36 | -7.08% | 55B | 15.96 | $1.84 | +2.44% |
| BFFAF | $51.50 | -0.76% | 46B | 52.55 | $0.98 | +4.96% |
| BASFY | $12.51 | -1.34% | 44.4B | 51.85 | $0.24 | +5.06% |
| SLMNP | $890.00 | +0.23% | 26.3B | 978.02 | $0.91 | +6.74% |
| TYNPF | $40.04 | +0.91% | 17.3B | 25.67 | $1.56 | +0.87% |
| AHKSF | $6.97 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 10.56 | $0.66 | +3.69% |
| AHKSY | $13.79 | -0.36% | 9.4B | 10.39 | $1.32 | N/A |
| GNENF | $3.59 | +0.52% | 9.2B | -25.63 | -$0.14 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
BSWGF vs SHECY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SHECY trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SHECY's competition here
BSWGF vs SHECF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SHECF trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SHECF's competition here
BSWGF vs BFFAF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BFFAF trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BFFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BFFAF's competition here
BSWGF vs BASFY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BASFY trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BASFY's competition here
BSWGF vs SLMNP Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SLMNP trades at $890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 978.02. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SLMNP's competition here
BSWGF vs TYNPF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while TYNPF trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check TYNPF's competition here
BSWGF vs AHKSF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while AHKSF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check AHKSF's competition here
BSWGF vs AHKSY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while AHKSY trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check AHKSY's competition here
BSWGF vs GNENF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while GNENF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -25.63. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check GNENF's competition here
BSWGF vs MTLHY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while MTLHY trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check MTLHY's competition here
BSWGF vs MTLHF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while MTLHF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check MTLHF's competition here
BSWGF vs PECGF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check PECGF's competition here
BSWGF vs IMCDY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while IMCDY trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check IMCDY's competition here
BSWGF vs GNENY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while GNENY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -26.79. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check GNENY's competition here
BSWGF vs PTGCF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to PTGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check PTGCF's competition here
BSWGF vs TOSCF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while TOSCF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check TOSCF's competition here
BSWGF vs NNCHY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while NNCHY trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check NNCHY's competition here
BSWGF vs BCHMF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BCHMF's competition here
BSWGF vs SOMMF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SOMMF's competition here
BSWGF vs SHWDY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SHWDY trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SHWDY's competition here
BSWGF vs SOMMY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SOMMY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SOMMY's competition here
BSWGF vs SHWDF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SHWDF's competition here
BSWGF vs KURRY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while KURRY trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check KURRY's competition here
BSWGF vs KURRF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check KURRF's competition here
BSWGF vs SVYSF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SVYSF trades at $33.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SVYSF's competition here
BSWGF vs KOYJF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while KOYJF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check KOYJF's competition here
BSWGF vs SLVYY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SLVYY trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SLVYY's competition here
BSWGF vs INDOY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to INDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check INDOY's competition here
BSWGF vs KPLUY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while KPLUY trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 756.80. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check KPLUY's competition here
BSWGF vs PCHUY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to PCHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check PCHUY's competition here
BSWGF vs RBTEF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while RBTEF trades at $922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check RBTEF's competition here
BSWGF vs DENKF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check DENKF's competition here
BSWGF vs NPKYY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check NPKYY's competition here
BSWGF vs MXCHF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while MXCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check MXCHF's competition here
BSWGF vs NPKYF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check NPKYF's competition here
BSWGF vs VYTPF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to VYTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check VYTPF's competition here
BSWGF vs FRRSF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check FRRSF's competition here
BSWGF vs LNZNF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while LNZNF trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check LNZNF's competition here
BSWGF vs TOAGF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check TOAGF's competition here
BSWGF vs BRGAY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BRGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BRGAY's competition here
BSWGF vs MXCHY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while MXCHY trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check MXCHY's competition here
BSWGF vs SGLFF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while SGLFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check SGLFF's competition here
BSWGF vs TYGIF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check TYGIF's competition here
BSWGF vs CDSAF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to CDSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check CDSAF's competition here
BSWGF vs NNXPF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 349.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while NNXPF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -51.25. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check NNXPF's competition here
BSWGF vs CRDE Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BSWGF has daily volatility of 9.31 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
BSWGF vs CNSJF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to CNSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check CNSJF's competition here
BSWGF vs BNOW Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BNOW's competition here
BSWGF vs HZRGF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while HZRGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check HZRGF's competition here
BSWGF vs BLGO Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BLGO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BLGO's competition here
BSWGF vs FGPHF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while FGPHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check FGPHF's competition here
BSWGF vs PLYR Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check PLYR's competition here
BSWGF vs CHHYF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check CHHYF's competition here
BSWGF vs FHELF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check FHELF's competition here
BSWGF vs EESE Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check EESE's competition here
BSWGF vs AGTT Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while AGTT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check AGTT's competition here
BSWGF vs OPCGF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 439.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to OPCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check OPCGF's competition here
BSWGF vs CHCC Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to CHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check CHCC's competition here
BSWGF vs AFPW Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check AFPW's competition here
BSWGF vs FLRE Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to FLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check FLRE's competition here
BSWGF vs LBTI Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check LBTI's competition here
BSWGF vs VULC Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check VULC's competition here
BSWGF vs MKDTY Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check MKDTY's competition here
BSWGF vs NUEC Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check NUEC's competition here
BSWGF vs RKTE Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check RKTE's competition here
BSWGF vs ADKCF Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to ADKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check ADKCF's competition here
BSWGF vs FIND Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to FIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check FIND's competition here
BSWGF vs ADKIL Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check ADKIL's competition here
BSWGF vs BMRK Comparison July 2025
BSWGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSWGF stands at 40.9M. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSWGF is priced at $1.02, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSWGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.29, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, BSWGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSWGF is more volatile compared to BMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSWGF.Check BMRK's competition here