Braemar Plc
Braemar Plc (BSEAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BSEAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSEAF | $3.00 | +0.00% | 91.9M | 13.65 | $0.22 | +2.99% |
| CICOF | $1.90 | +2.70% | 33.8B | 4.42 | $0.43 | +11.33% |
| AMKBF | $2,135.18 | -3.60% | 33.4B | 4.89 | $437.02 | +7.70% |
| AMKBY | $10.53 | +0.86% | 32.9B | 4.82 | $2.18 | +10.57% |
| AMKAF | $2,082.91 | +0.00% | 32.6B | 4.77 | $436.99 | +7.89% |
| CICOY | $9.53 | +3.03% | 30.3B | 4.43 | $2.15 | +11.01% |
| HPGLY | $70.73 | +0.00% | 24.9B | 8.99 | $7.87 | +6.56% |
| HLAGF | $139.00 | -2.11% | 24.4B | 8.88 | $15.65 | +6.90% |
| ICTEF | $8.55 | -5.42% | 17.3B | 19.43 | $0.44 | +2.89% |
| NPNYY | $7.24 | +0.05% | 15.9B | 4.99 | $1.45 | +4.02% |
Stock Comparison
BSEAF vs CICOF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CICOF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CICOF's competition here
BSEAF vs AMKBF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while AMKBF trades at $2,135.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check AMKBF's competition here
BSEAF vs AMKBY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while AMKBY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check AMKBY's competition here
BSEAF vs AMKAF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while AMKAF trades at $2,082.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check AMKAF's competition here
BSEAF vs CICOY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CICOY trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CICOY's competition here
BSEAF vs HPGLY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HPGLY trades at $70.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HPGLY's competition here
BSEAF vs HLAGF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HLAGF trades at $139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HLAGF's competition here
BSEAF vs ICTEF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while ICTEF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check ICTEF's competition here
BSEAF vs NPNYY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while NPNYY trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check NPNYY's competition here
BSEAF vs NYUKF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while NYUKF trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check NYUKF's competition here
BSEAF vs OROVY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while OROVY trades at $93.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check OROVY's competition here
BSEAF vs OROVF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while OROVF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check OROVF's competition here
BSEAF vs MSLOY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while MSLOY trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check MSLOY's competition here
BSEAF vs MSLOF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while MSLOF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check MSLOF's competition here
BSEAF vs SITIF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SITIF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SITIF's competition here
BSEAF vs SITIY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SITIY trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SITIY's competition here
BSEAF vs KAIKY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while KAIKY trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check KAIKY's competition here
BSEAF vs KAKKF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check KAKKF's competition here
BSEAF vs CMHHY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CMHHY trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CMHHY's competition here
BSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CMHHF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CMHHF's competition here
BSEAF vs QNDPF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while QNDPF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check QNDPF's competition here
BSEAF vs MIHDF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check MIHDF's competition here
BSEAF vs CSDXF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CSDXF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CSDXF's competition here
BSEAF vs CITAF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CITAF's competition here
BSEAF vs HAFNF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HAFNF's competition here
BSEAF vs DLPTF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check DLPTF's competition here
BSEAF vs CSPKF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CSPKF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CSPKF's competition here
BSEAF vs TDGMW Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while TDGMW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check TDGMW's competition here
BSEAF vs PTAUF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check PTAUF's competition here
BSEAF vs HFIAF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HFIAF's competition here
BSEAF vs PTAUY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check PTAUY's competition here
BSEAF vs HOEGF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HOEGF trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HOEGF's competition here
BSEAF vs BWLLY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check BWLLY's competition here
BSEAF vs CADLF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CADLF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CADLF's competition here
BSEAF vs BWLLF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check BWLLF's competition here
BSEAF vs SOIEF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SOIEF trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SOIEF's competition here
BSEAF vs CKNHF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CKNHF trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CKNHF's competition here
BSEAF vs HCTPF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HCTPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HCTPF's competition here
BSEAF vs HHULY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HHULY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HHULY's competition here
BSEAF vs CITAY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CITAY's competition here
BSEAF vs PCFBF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while PCFBF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check PCFBF's competition here
BSEAF vs HHULF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HHULF's competition here
BSEAF vs PCFBY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while PCFBY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check PCFBY's competition here
BSEAF vs WTSHF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while WTSHF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check WTSHF's competition here
BSEAF vs CHDGF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CHDGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CHDGF's competition here
BSEAF vs IRCUF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while IRCUF trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check IRCUF's competition here
BSEAF vs DPBSF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while DPBSF trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check DPBSF's competition here
BSEAF vs OKENF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check OKENF's competition here
BSEAF vs MPZZF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 849.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while MPZZF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check MPZZF's competition here
BSEAF vs TJIPF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 739M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while TJIPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check TJIPF's competition here
BSEAF vs LTKBF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check LTKBF's competition here
BSEAF vs SEMUF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SEMUF's competition here
BSEAF vs DMCOF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 552.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while DMCOF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check DMCOF's competition here
BSEAF vs AGMJF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while AGMJF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check AGMJF's competition here
BSEAF vs TSMTF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check TSMTF's competition here
BSEAF vs TTBKF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 307.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while TTBKF trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check TTBKF's competition here
BSEAF vs PSGFF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check PSGFF's competition here
BSEAF vs JMSFF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check JMSFF's competition here
BSEAF vs SLOFF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SLOFF's competition here
BSEAF vs CSPKY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while CSPKY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check CSPKY's competition here
BSEAF vs MKOTF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check MKOTF's competition here
BSEAF vs HSPPF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HSPPF's competition here
BSEAF vs VKGLF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check VKGLF's competition here
BSEAF vs HUPHY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while HUPHY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check HUPHY's competition here
BSEAF vs JNSTF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check JNSTF's competition here
BSEAF vs AWLNF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check AWLNF's competition here
BSEAF vs GEOUF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check GEOUF's competition here
BSEAF vs WSSTF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while WSSTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check WSSTF's competition here
BSEAF vs ADCUF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check ADCUF's competition here
BSEAF vs ASCJF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check ASCJF's competition here
BSEAF vs GTMAY Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while GTMAY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check GTMAY's competition here
BSEAF vs BBLKF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check BBLKF's competition here
BSEAF vs ULTRF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check ULTRF's competition here
BSEAF vs SEAOF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SEAOF's competition here
BSEAF vs TEUFF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check TEUFF's competition here
BSEAF vs WLOLQ Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check WLOLQ's competition here
BSEAF vs PRGNF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check PRGNF's competition here
BSEAF vs TEUCF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is less volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check TEUCF's competition here
BSEAF vs ITKSF Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check ITKSF's competition here
BSEAF vs SEPI Comparison August 2025
BSEAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSEAF stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSEAF is priced at $3.00, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSEAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSEAF is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSEAF.Check SEPI's competition here