Baran Group Ltd

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 80.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ACSAY trades at $12.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 79.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while VCISY trades at $35.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 79.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BOUYY trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 79.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while VCISF trades at $141.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to VCISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, LTOUF has a market cap of 50.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while LTOUF trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas LTOUF's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and LTOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 48.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PWR trades at $325.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 24.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WSPOF trades at $186.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 19.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while EME trades at $439.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 18.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CRWOF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ACSAF trades at $63.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and ACSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 15.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while FIX trades at $434.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, J has a market cap of 14.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while J trades at $122.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas J's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ACM trades at $104.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 13.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BOUYF trades at $36.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 13.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while HOCFF trades at $175.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and HOCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and EFGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while EFGSY trades at $27.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 12.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while APG trades at $44.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 72.39. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 11.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MTZ trades at $148.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 54.49. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while OBYCF trades at $15.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KAJMY trades at $23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while STN trades at $94.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while STBBF trades at $92.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and STBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KAJMF trades at $20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TTEK trades at $35.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TISCY trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SNCAF trades at $52.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and SNCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SKBSY trades at $21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BLD trades at $295.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and AVHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ACXIF trades at $149.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SKSBF trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and SKSBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KBR trades at $55.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TISCF trades at $37.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and TISCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CCOHF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while FLR trades at $35.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BCKIY trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and BCKIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BCKIF trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while DY trades at $188.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while STRL trades at $177.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ROAD trades at $95.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 90.32. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while IESC trades at $245.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SHMUY trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 61.64. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ARCAY trades at $49.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PUODY trades at $223.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PUODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and RBWNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ARCVF trades at $46.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while NWSGY trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while IMPJY trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while NWSZF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PRIM trades at $68.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while GVA trades at $82.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BAFBF trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and BAFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BFLBY trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and BFLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BFLBF trades at $83.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while OPMXF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 96.06. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SENGF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and PYYIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ECG trades at $48.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MYRG trades at $155.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 72.05. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AGX trades at $170.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while JGCCY trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and JGCCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TPC trades at $32.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TPC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and PNOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and AGRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TNISY trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while LMB trades at $122.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TNISF trades at $17.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to TNISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KLRGF trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while NVEE trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KBAGF trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and KBAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 984.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BADFF trades at $28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and BADFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 978.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BIRDF trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and BIRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and CKOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 933.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and MOPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 825.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ELWSF trades at $62.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -33.66. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 821.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AEGXF trades at $13.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 786.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KIERF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 720.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while GLDD trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 700.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AMRC trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while YITYY trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and YITYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 614.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WLDN trades at $42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and RNWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 558.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 554.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SLAAF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and CHYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 431.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BWMN trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 146.29. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 363.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BBCP trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 343.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MTRX trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 304.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ORN trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 77.10. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 279.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BRAGF trades at $6.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 258.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CSGQF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and CSGQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 238.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while RITR trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RITR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AENZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 170.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SLND trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLND's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while DBMG trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and DBMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 157.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ESOA trades at $9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 139.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while JUNE trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -134.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 101.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MIMI trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is 146.83. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 94.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while VATE trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 86.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BLNK trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 61.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SHIM trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHIM's ROE of -71.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and KNNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MSW trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 46.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AGFY trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -5.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 40.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ONEG trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONEG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 37.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while APEUF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and APEUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 34.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while BILBF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and BILBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MLLUY trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MURSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and MURSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 21.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while FGL trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 15.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MRCR trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and MRCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 13.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WXM trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 12.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PGHL trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and LOUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 8.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while FBGL trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while COLDF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 6.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SUNE trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNE's ROE of +161.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 6.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while GRHI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENG's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WLGS trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and ETWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CIPI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SODE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to SODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PMDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while RELT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RELT's ROE of +8.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, EFTI has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while EFTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas EFTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EFTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and EFTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, PRKV has a market cap of 662925.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while PRKV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas PRKV's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRKV's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and PRKV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, RIII has a market cap of 421413.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while RIII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas RIII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RIII's ROE of +236.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and RIII have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, JNSH has a market cap of 220343.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while JNSH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas JNSH's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JNSH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to JNSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, CCGM has a market cap of 200400.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while CCGM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas CCGM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to CCGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, GNSPF has a market cap of 90093.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while GNSPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas GNSPF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNSPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and GNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, DLOC has a market cap of 73377.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while DLOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas DLOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLOC's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and DLOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, FRCN has a market cap of 59926.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while FRCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas FRCN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRCN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and FRCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, VICT has a market cap of 23086.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while VICT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas VICT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VICT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to VICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WAXS has a market cap of 7339.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WAXS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WAXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WAXS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WAXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ARME has a market cap of 4517.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ARME trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ARME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARME's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and ARME have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, WLMSQ has a market cap of 2721.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while WLMSQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas WLMSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLMSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to WLMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, NSMG has a market cap of 2467.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while NSMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas NSMG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to NSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, TSNI has a market cap of 1458.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while TSNI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas TSNI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and TSNI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, AMLC has a market cap of 433.00. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while AMLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas AMLC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF and AMLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, HIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SKBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SKBL trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKBL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRANF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SKBL has daily volatility of N/A.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, IEA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, MCDIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while MCDIF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas MCDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCDIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to MCDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SKK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SKK trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRANF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SKK has daily volatility of N/A.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, ATCX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while ATCX trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRANF is less volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRANF.

BRANF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRANF stands at 91.27M. In comparison, SCCI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BRANF is priced at $2.35, while SCCI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRANF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.56, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRANF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRANF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.