BP p.l.c.
BP p.l.c. (BPAQF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BPAQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPAQF | $5.30 | -1.62% | 82.6B | -75.71 | -$0.07 | +6.01% |
| RYDAF | $35.65 | -1.52% | 209.3B | 16.31 | $2.19 | +3.93% |
| PCCYF | $0.94 | -2.83% | 208.9B | 7.24 | $0.13 | +29.84% |
| TTFNF | $59.02 | -1.63% | 130B | 10.69 | $5.52 | +5.98% |
| SNPMF | $0.56 | -3.02% | 86.5B | 9.26 | $0.06 | +31.46% |
| OMVKY | $12.90 | +1.18% | 67.5B | 17.41 | $0.74 | +11.68% |
| STOHF | $25.99 | +2.32% | 65.9B | 8.61 | $3.02 | +17.79% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| EIPAF | $18.34 | +5.55% | 54B | 21.33 | $0.86 | +4.49% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BPAQF vs RYDAF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 209.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while RYDAF trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check RYDAF's competition here
BPAQF vs PCCYF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PCCYF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PCCYF's competition here
BPAQF vs TTFNF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while TTFNF trades at $59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check TTFNF's competition here
BPAQF vs SNPMF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while SNPMF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check SNPMF's competition here
BPAQF vs OMVKY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OMVKY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OMVKY's competition here
BPAQF vs STOHF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while STOHF trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check STOHF's competition here
BPAQF vs RNFTF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check RNFTF's competition here
BPAQF vs EIPAF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while EIPAF trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check EIPAF's competition here
BPAQF vs LUKOY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check LUKOY's competition here
BPAQF vs PETFF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PETFF's competition here
BPAQF vs PUTRF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PUTRF's competition here
BPAQF vs PUTRY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PUTRY's competition here
BPAQF vs GLPEY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while GLPEY trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check GLPEY's competition here
BPAQF vs PSKOF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PSKOF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PSKOF's competition here
BPAQF vs OMVJF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OMVJF trades at $54.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OMVJF's competition here
BPAQF vs REPYF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while REPYF trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check REPYF's competition here
BPAQF vs REPYY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while REPYY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check REPYY's competition here
BPAQF vs GLPEF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while GLPEF trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check GLPEF's competition here
BPAQF vs OGFGY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OGFGY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OGFGY's competition here
BPAQF vs OGFGF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OGFGF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OGFGF's competition here
BPAQF vs MGYOY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while MGYOY trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check MGYOY's competition here
BPAQF vs OAOFY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OAOFY's competition here
BPAQF vs SLTQY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check SLTQY's competition here
BPAQF vs HLPMF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check HLPMF's competition here
BPAQF vs ISRMF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check ISRMF's competition here
BPAQF vs RTEXF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check RTEXF's competition here
BPAQF vs WDGJY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check WDGJY's competition here
BPAQF vs UNTC Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while UNTC trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check UNTC's competition here
BPAQF vs WDGJF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 226.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while WDGJF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check WDGJF's competition here
BPAQF vs PXPEF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PXPEF's competition here
BPAQF vs SEGYY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check SEGYY's competition here
BPAQF vs ECTM Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while ECTM trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check ECTM's competition here
BPAQF vs OKMN Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OKMN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OKMN's competition here
BPAQF vs UNTCW Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while UNTCW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check UNTCW's competition here
BPAQF vs GRGUF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check GRGUF's competition here
BPAQF vs POGS Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 636.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while POGS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check POGS's competition here
BPAQF vs AEDC Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check AEDC's competition here
BPAQF vs TRNX Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check TRNX's competition here
BPAQF vs PEMC Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PEMC's competition here
BPAQF vs SNVP Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check SNVP's competition here
BPAQF vs FRMC Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check FRMC's competition here
BPAQF vs PGAS Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check PGAS's competition here
BPAQF vs BNXR Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check BNXR's competition here
BPAQF vs AMNE Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check AMNE's competition here
BPAQF vs NUSPQ Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check NUSPQ's competition here
BPAQF vs RRRI Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check RRRI's competition here
BPAQF vs OJSCY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check OJSCY's competition here
BPAQF vs SNPTY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check SNPTY's competition here
BPAQF vs VCOGF Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check VCOGF's competition here
BPAQF vs SGTZY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check SGTZY's competition here
BPAQF vs POGWY Comparison August 2025
BPAQF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPAQF stands at 82.6B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPAQF is priced at $5.30, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPAQF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.71, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, BPAQF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BPAQF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPAQF.Check POGWY's competition here