BioInvent International AB (publ)

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, NONOF has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while NONOF trades at $57.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas NONOF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NONOF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to NONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check NONOF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CSLLY has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CSLLY trades at $70.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CSLLY's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CSLLY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CSLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CSLLY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CMXHF has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CMXHF trades at $148.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CMXHF's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CMXHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CMXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CMXHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, UCBJF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while UCBJF trades at $235.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas UCBJF's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UCBJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to UCBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check UCBJF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, UCBJY has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while UCBJY trades at $115.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas UCBJY's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UCBJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to UCBJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check UCBJY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ARGNF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ARGNF trades at $619.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ARGNF's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ARGNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ARGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ARGNF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ODTC has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ODTC trades at $22,005.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ODTC's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ODTC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ODTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ODTC's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, IVBXF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while IVBXF trades at $12.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas IVBXF's P/E ratio is -1273.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IVBXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to IVBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check IVBXF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SBMFF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SBMFF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SBMFF's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SBMFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SBMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SBMFF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SBHMY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SBHMY trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SBHMY's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SBHMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SBHMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SBHMY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, WXXWY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while WXXWY trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas WXXWY's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WXXWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to WXXWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check WXXWY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, WXIBF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while WXIBF trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas WXIBF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WXIBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to WXIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check WXIBF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, GNMSF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while GNMSF trades at $244.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas GNMSF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GNMSF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to GNMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check GNMSF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, TRSBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while TRSBF trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas TRSBF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TRSBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to TRSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check TRSBF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, AKBLF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while AKBLF trades at $28.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas AKBLF's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AKBLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to AKBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check AKBLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ABCZF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ABCZF trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ABCZF's P/E ratio is 2225.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ABCZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ABCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ABCZF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, AAVXF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while AAVXF trades at $71.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas AAVXF's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AAVXF's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to AAVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check AAVXF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SHJBF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SHJBF trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SHJBF's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SHJBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SHJBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SHJBF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, INCPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while INCPF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas INCPF's P/E ratio is -108.67. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to INCPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to INCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check INCPF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, GNNSF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while GNNSF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas GNNSF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GNNSF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to GNNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check GNNSF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, LABFF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while LABFF trades at $90.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas LABFF's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LABFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to LABFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check LABFF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ZLDPF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ZLDPF trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ZLDPF's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ZLDPF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ZLDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ZLDPF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, TLPPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while TLPPF trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas TLPPF's P/E ratio is 625.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TLPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to TLPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check TLPPF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CAMRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CAMRF trades at $68.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CAMRF's P/E ratio is 55.08. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CAMRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CAMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CAMRF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ASPHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ASPHF trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ASPHF's P/E ratio is -56.05. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ASPHF's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to ASPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ASPHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BVNRY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BVNRY trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BVNRY's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BVNRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BVNRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BVNRY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BVNKF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BVNKF trades at $37.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BVNKF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BVNKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BVNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BVNKF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, REGMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while REGMF trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas REGMF's P/E ratio is -13.32. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to REGMF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to REGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check REGMF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, TKBIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while TKBIF trades at $23.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas TKBIF's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TKBIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to TKBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check TKBIF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, MPSYF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while MPSYF trades at $73.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas MPSYF's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MPSYF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to MPSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check MPSYF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ONTTF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ONTTF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ONTTF's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ONTTF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ONTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ONTTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, GLPGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while GLPGF trades at $33.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas GLPGF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GLPGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to GLPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check GLPGF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BRCTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BRCTF trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BRCTF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BRCTF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BRCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BRCTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, GENSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while GENSF trades at $33.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas GENSF's P/E ratio is -416.12. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GENSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to GENSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check GENSF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, MEOBF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while MEOBF trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas MEOBF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MEOBF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to MEOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check MEOBF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ASCLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ASCLF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ASCLF's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ASCLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ASCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ASCLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PHMMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PHMMF trades at $96.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PHMMF's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PHMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PHMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PHMMF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BIESF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BIESF trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BIESF's P/E ratio is -44.44. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BIESF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BIESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BIESF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, NURPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while NURPF trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas NURPF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NURPF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to NURPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check NURPF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, HBMHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while HBMHF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas HBMHF's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HBMHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to HBMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check HBMHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PPTDF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PPTDF trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PPTDF's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PPTDF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PPTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PPTDF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CSBTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CSBTF trades at $34.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CSBTF's P/E ratio is -287.33. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CSBTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CSBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CSBTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BRAXF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BRAXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BRAXF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BRAXF's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to BRAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BRAXF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CSPHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CSPHF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CSPHF's P/E ratio is -21.37. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CSPHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CSPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CSPHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SNBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SNBIF trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SNBIF's P/E ratio is -40.12. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SNBIF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to SNBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SNBIF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, INRLF has a market cap of 977.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while INRLF trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas INRLF's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to INRLF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to INRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check INRLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BTTAY has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BTTAY trades at $24.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BTTAY's P/E ratio is -67.31. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BTTAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BTTAY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PHGUF has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PHGUF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PHGUF's P/E ratio is -130.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PHGUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PHGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PHGUF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BPMUF has a market cap of 831M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BPMUF trades at $67.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BPMUF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BPMUF's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to BPMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BPMUF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, IDRSF has a market cap of 723.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while IDRSF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas IDRSF's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IDRSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to IDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check IDRSF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, VBIZF has a market cap of 674.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while VBIZF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas VBIZF's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VBIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to VBIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check VBIZF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SOLTF has a market cap of 621.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SOLTF trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SOLTF's P/E ratio is -27.48. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SOLTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SOLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SOLTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CKDXF has a market cap of 541.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CKDXF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CKDXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CKDXF's ROE of +2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to CKDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CKDXF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, RAONF has a market cap of 451.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while RAONF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas RAONF's P/E ratio is -43.33. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RAONF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to RAONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check RAONF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, TBGNF has a market cap of 433.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while TBGNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas TBGNF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TBGNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to TBGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check TBGNF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PTCHF has a market cap of 432M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PTCHF trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PTCHF's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PTCHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PTCHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, HLOSF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while HLOSF trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas HLOSF's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HLOSF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to HLOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check HLOSF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CLVLY has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CLVLY trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CLVLY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CLVLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CLVLY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CLVLF has a market cap of 399M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CLVLF trades at $7.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CLVLF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CLVLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CLVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CLVLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CYDY has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CYDY trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CYDY's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CYDY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CYDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CYDY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, NWBO has a market cap of 348.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while NWBO trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas NWBO's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NWBO's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to NWBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check NWBO's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, IVEVF has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while IVEVF trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas IVEVF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IVEVF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to IVEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check IVEVF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, FGHQF has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while FGHQF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas FGHQF's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FGHQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to FGHQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check FGHQF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PBBIF has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PBBIF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PBBIF's P/E ratio is 266.67. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PBBIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PBBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PBBIF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, AVCTF has a market cap of 285.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while AVCTF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas AVCTF's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AVCTF's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to AVCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check AVCTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PRRUF has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PRRUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PRRUF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PRRUF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PRRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PRRUF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, JWCTF has a market cap of 267.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while JWCTF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas JWCTF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to JWCTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to JWCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check JWCTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ORYZF has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ORYZF trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ORYZF's P/E ratio is -46.86. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ORYZF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ORYZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ORYZF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CLTEF has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CLTEF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CLTEF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CLTEF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CLTEF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, NWPHF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while NWPHF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas NWPHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NWPHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to NWPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check NWPHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SLNCF has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SLNCF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SLNCF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SLNCF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SLNCF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SPHDF has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SPHDF trades at $18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SPHDF's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SPHDF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SPHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SPHDF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, HNSBF has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while HNSBF trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas HNSBF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HNSBF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to HNSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check HNSBF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, MDCLF has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while MDCLF trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas MDCLF's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MDCLF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to MDCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check MDCLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CAIHF has a market cap of 228.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CAIHF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CAIHF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CAIHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to CAIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CAIHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, CMVLF has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while CMVLF trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas CMVLF's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CMVLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to CMVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check CMVLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, FPHAF has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while FPHAF trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas FPHAF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FPHAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to FPHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check FPHAF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, VSBC has a market cap of 207M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while VSBC trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas VSBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VSBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to VSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check VSBC's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, IPHYF has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while IPHYF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas IPHYF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IPHYF's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to IPHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check IPHYF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, NGENF has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while NGENF trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas NGENF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NGENF's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to NGENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check NGENF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, GNFTF has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while GNFTF trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas GNFTF's P/E ratio is 124.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GNFTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to GNFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check GNFTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BXPHF has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BXPHF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BXPHF's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BXPHF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BXPHF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BRIBF has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BRIBF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BRIBF's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BRIBF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BRIBF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ADOCY has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ADOCY trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ADOCY's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ADOCY's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ADOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ADOCY's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, OPORF has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while OPORF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas OPORF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to OPORF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to OPORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check OPORF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, KNTPF has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while KNTPF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas KNTPF's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to KNTPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to KNTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check KNTPF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, MLLCF has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while MLLCF trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas MLLCF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MLLCF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to MLLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check MLLCF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, SCNLF has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while SCNLF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas SCNLF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SCNLF's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to SCNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check SCNLF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, AMGXF has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while AMGXF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas AMGXF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AMGXF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to AMGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check AMGXF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, AAPGV has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while AAPGV trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas AAPGV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AAPGV's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to AAPGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check AAPGV's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PSTTF has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PSTTF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PSTTF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PSTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PSTTF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, EPRXF has a market cap of 108.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while EPRXF trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas EPRXF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EPRXF's ROE of -4.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to EPRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check EPRXF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ADOIF has a market cap of 103.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ADOIF trades at $8.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ADOIF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ADOIF's ROE of +6.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ADOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ADOIF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, BSEM has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while BSEM trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas BSEM's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BSEM's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to BSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check BSEM's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, TRGNF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while TRGNF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas TRGNF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TRGNF's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to TRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check TRGNF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, MCURF has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while MCURF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas MCURF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MCURF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to MCURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check MCURF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, PBIGF has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while PBIGF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas PBIGF's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PBIGF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to PBIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check PBIGF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ATGGF has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ATGGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ATGGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ATGGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is less volatile compared to ATGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ATGGF's competition here

BOVNF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOVNF stands at 216.4M. In comparison, ACHFF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOVNF is priced at $3.29, while ACHFF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.44, whereas ACHFF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BOVNF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ACHFF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BOVNF is more volatile compared to ACHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOVNF.Check ACHFF's competition here