Best of the Best PLC
Best of the Best PLC (BOTB.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BOTB.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTB.L | £532.00 | +0.38% | 45M | 9.85 | £0.54 | N/A |
| FLTR.L | £22,360.00 | +0.45% | 39.5B | 103.52 | £2.16 | N/A |
| 0A37.L | £165.00 | -0.60% | 22.7B | 220.62 | £0.75 | +2.84% |
| 0ABA.L | £44.86 | +21.08% | 22.3B | -11.07 | -£4.05 | N/A |
| 0JWC.L | £37.54 | -1.75% | 10.2B | 11.96 | £3.14 | N/A |
| ENT.L | £998.60 | +1.57% | 6.4B | -14.06 | -£0.71 | +1.37% |
| 0LK3.L | £159.07 | -1.66% | 5.9B | 20.54 | £7.75 | +5.58% |
| 0EAW.L | £188.69 | +0.00% | 4B | 160.58 | £1.18 | N/A |
| 0O80.L | £104.50 | -1.42% | 2.6B | 348.33 | £0.30 | +1.44% |
| PTEC.L | £393.50 | +0.38% | 1.2B | 24.59 | £0.16 | +123.38% |
Stock Comparison
BOTB.L vs FLTR.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, FLTR.L has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while FLTR.L trades at £22,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas FLTR.L's P/E ratio is 103.52. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FLTR.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to FLTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check FLTR.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0A37.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0A37.L has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0A37.L trades at £165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0A37.L's P/E ratio is 220.62. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0A37.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to 0A37.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0A37.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0ABA.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0ABA.L has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0ABA.L trades at £44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0ABA.L's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0ABA.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is more volatile compared to 0ABA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0ABA.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0JWC.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0JWC.L has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0JWC.L trades at £37.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0JWC.L's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0JWC.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to 0JWC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0JWC.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs ENT.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, ENT.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while ENT.L trades at £998.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas ENT.L's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ENT.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to ENT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check ENT.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0LK3.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0LK3.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0LK3.L trades at £159.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0LK3.L's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0LK3.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to 0LK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0LK3.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0EAW.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0EAW.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0EAW.L trades at £188.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0EAW.L's P/E ratio is 160.58. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0EAW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to 0EAW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0EAW.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0O80.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0O80.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0O80.L trades at £104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0O80.L's P/E ratio is 348.33. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0O80.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to 0O80.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0O80.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs PTEC.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, PTEC.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while PTEC.L trades at £393.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas PTEC.L's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PTEC.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to PTEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check PTEC.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs RNK.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, RNK.L has a market cap of 742.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while RNK.L trades at £158.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas RNK.L's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RNK.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to RNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check RNK.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 888.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 888.L has a market cap of 383.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 888.L trades at £85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 888.L's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 888.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is more volatile compared to 888.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 888.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs EVOK.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, EVOK.L has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while EVOK.L trades at £70.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas EVOK.L's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to EVOK.L's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to EVOK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check EVOK.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs GMR.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, GMR.L has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while GMR.L trades at £54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas GMR.L's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GMR.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to GMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check GMR.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs B90.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, B90.L has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while B90.L trades at £3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas B90.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to B90.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to B90.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check B90.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs CMX.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, CMX.L has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while CMX.L trades at £57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas CMX.L's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CMX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is more volatile compared to CMX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check CMX.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs SPO.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, SPO.L has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while SPO.L trades at £84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas SPO.L's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SPO.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BOTB.L has daily volatility of 0.94 and SPO.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPO.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs TNT.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, TNT.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while TNT.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas TNT.L's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TNT.L's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BOTB.L has daily volatility of 0.94 and TNT.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check TNT.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs MIN.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, MIN.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while MIN.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas MIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MIN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is more volatile compared to MIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check MIN.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs WEB.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, WEB.L has a market cap of 295K. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while WEB.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas WEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to WEB.L's ROE of -25.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to WEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check WEB.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs GYS.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, GYS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while GYS.L trades at £1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas GYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GYS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to GYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check GYS.L's competition here
BOTB.L vs 0SYQ.L Comparison July 2025
BOTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOTB.L stands at 45M. In comparison, 0SYQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOTB.L is priced at £532.00, while 0SYQ.L trades at £9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.85, whereas 0SYQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, BOTB.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0SYQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOTB.L is less volatile compared to 0SYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOTB.L.Check 0SYQ.L's competition here