boohoo group plc
boohoo group plc BOO.L Peers
See (BOO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOO.L | $26.10 | -1.21% | 364.67M | -1.30 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| 0R1O.IL | $211.80 | -0.70% | 2.25T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0JVQ.L | $229.86 | -0.44% | 128.65B | 18.67 | $12.31 | +2.01% |
| 0K0E.L | $2,530.00 | -0.60% | 128.26B | 692.96 | $3.65 | N/A |
| 0KAB.L | $1,321.02 | -0.14% | 75.28B | 42.28 | $31.25 | N/A |
| 0HJL.L | $3,672.08 | +0.32% | 61.43B | 32.41 | $113.30 | N/A |
| 0KXO.L | $149.70 | +1.51% | 49.23B | 33.26 | $4.50 | +1.01% |
| 0LD8.L | $95.02 | -3.97% | 43.17B | 7.85 | $12.11 | +4.69% |
| 0R3D.L | $69.20 | -0.72% | 31.90B | 17.55 | $3.94 | +1.58% |
| 0LXC.L | $175.51 | +0.71% | 21.58B | 11.40 | $15.39 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
BOO.L vs 0R1O.IL Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 2.25T. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0R1O.IL trades at $211.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0JVQ.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 128.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0JVQ.L trades at $229.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0K0E.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 128.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0K0E.L trades at $2,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 692.96. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0KAB.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 75.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0KAB.L trades at $1,321.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0HJL.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 61.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0HJL.L trades at $3,672.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0KXO.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 49.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0KXO.L trades at $149.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0LD8.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 43.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0LD8.L trades at $95.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0R3D.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 31.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0R3D.L trades at $69.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0LXC.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0LXC.L trades at $175.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IC7.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IC7.L has a market cap of 19.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IC7.L trades at $87.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IC7.L's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IC7.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0LIB.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 18.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0LIB.L trades at $411.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IC8.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 17.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IC8.L trades at $85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IUX.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 17.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IUX.L trades at $123.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0R18.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0R18.L trades at $73.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0HTQ.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0HTQ.L trades at $68.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0QVE.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0QVE.L trades at $600.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 134.92. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0QVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0JSC.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0JSC.L trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0RCW.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0RCW.L trades at $156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IPD.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IPD.L trades at $103.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IIW.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IIW.L trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs JD.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while JD.L trades at $90.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0SOM.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0SOM.L trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0KTF.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0KTF.L trades at $217.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0R32.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0R32.L has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0R32.L trades at $79.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0R32.L's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0R32.L's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to 0R32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs DFIB.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, DFIB.L has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while DFIB.L trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DFIB.L's P/E ratio is -50.94. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DFIB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to DFIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs FRAS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while FRAS.L trades at $709.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs ROO.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while ROO.L trades at $175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs DNLM.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while DNLM.L trades at $1,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs JET.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while JET.L trades at $1,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0H9G.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0H9G.L trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0QK3.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0QK3.L trades at $35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0HSU.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0HSU.L trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs CURY.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while CURY.L trades at $121.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs SMWH.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while SMWH.L trades at $1,011.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 252.75. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IQK.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IQK.L trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs PETS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while PETS.L trades at $256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0JRL.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 833.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0JRL.L trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs MOON.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 812.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while MOON.L trades at $244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -40.67. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs AO.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 540.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while AO.L trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs THG.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 383.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while THG.L trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs ASC.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 368.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while ASC.L trades at $309.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs HFD.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 357.78M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while HFD.L trades at $163.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0RA5.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0RA5.L trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0RA5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs CARD.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 329.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while CARD.L trades at $94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs DEBS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 300.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while DEBS.L trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0KDU.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 288.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0KDU.L trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0ROF.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0ROF.L trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs BWNG.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while BWNG.L trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0OQX.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 143.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0OQX.L trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0OQX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs SCS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, SCS.L has a market cap of 95.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while SCS.L trades at $270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SCS.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SCS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to SCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0RP3.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 81.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0RP3.L trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0RP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs IGR.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 61.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while IGR.L trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs MRK.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 60.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while MRK.L trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs PROC.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 40.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while PROC.L trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to PROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs ANG.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 30.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while ANG.L trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs G4M.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 29.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while G4M.L trades at $138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs HRN.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while HRN.L trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs SOS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, SOS.L has a market cap of 19.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while SOS.L trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SOS.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SOS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to SOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs WRKS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 16.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while WRKS.L trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs MTC.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, MTC.L has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while MTC.L trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MTC.L's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MTC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to MTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs PODP.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 9.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while PODP.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to PODP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs MMAG.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while MMAG.L trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to MMAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs SCHO.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while SCHO.L trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0DQK.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0DQK.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0DQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs DISP.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while DISP.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to DISP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs UBG.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488670.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while UBG.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to UBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs ITS.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406875.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while ITS.L trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to ITS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.
BOO.L vs 0IJU.L Comparison
BOO.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOO.L stands at 364.67M. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOO.L is priced at $26.10, while 0IJU.L trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOO.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BOO.L's ROE is -0.41%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BOO.L is more volatile compared to 0IJU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOO.L.