The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 26.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while AONNY trades at $30.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 132.26. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and AONNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 19.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SVTMF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and SVTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 17.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while AONNF trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to AONNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SMKUY has a market cap of 10.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SMKUY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMKUY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMKUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SMKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while MAKSY trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, MAKSF has a market cap of 9.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while MAKSF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKSF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAKSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to MAKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, RYKKY has a market cap of 9.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while RYKKY trades at $34.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYKKY's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYKKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to RYKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SRGHY trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SRHGF trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SRHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and IMHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while TOKUY trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and TOKUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while RYKKF trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to RYKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, DDS has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while DDS trades at $352.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDS's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to DDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while TOKUF trades at $9.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to TOKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to WLWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, JWN has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while JWN trades at $24.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWN's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to JWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, M has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while M trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to M's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to M. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while INREF trades at $29.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and INREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LRENY trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while JFROF trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and JFROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while WLWHY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to WLWHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SURRY trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and SURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SURRF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SURRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURRF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LENTY trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PMDKY trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PMDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while TKSHF trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to TKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PGCMF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PGCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PPASF trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 131.98. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PMDKF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PMDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while RRETY trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to RRETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PKPYY trades at $6.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PKPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 849.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LCMRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LCMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, KSS has a market cap of 725.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while KSS trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSS's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to KSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, EXTO has a market cap of 585.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while EXTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXTO's P/E ratio is 90.25. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXTO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to EXTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, DDT has a market cap of 416.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while DDT trades at $26.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to DDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 326.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while CBDBY trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to CBDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, CBD has a market cap of 218.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while CBD trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBD's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBD's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to CBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 184.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while WHGPF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to WHGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 74.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LHUAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 53.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while NWRLY trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and NWRLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 33.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PKSGY trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PKSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while HDVTY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and HDVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while VEST trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEST's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to VEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 101878.00. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SRSCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, SHLDQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and SHLDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, LFSYY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LFSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1786.00. In comparison, LFSYF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LFSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).