The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. BONTQ Peers
See (BONTQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Department Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BONTQ | $0.00 | N/A | 1.8K | N/A | -$0.03 | N/A |
| AONNY | $30.73 | +1.29% | 26.3B | 133.61 | $0.23 | +0.25% |
| SVTMF | $15.54 | -0.02% | 19.1B | 12.53 | $1.24 | +1.50% |
| AONNF | $20.65 | N/A | 17.8B | 103.25 | $0.20 | +0.60% |
| MAKSF | $5.45 | +4.81% | 11B | 28.68 | $0.19 | +0.70% |
| MAKSY | $10.50 | +1.67% | 10.6B | 27.63 | $0.38 | +0.54% |
| SMKUY | $1.00 | N/A | 10.6B | 50.00 | $0.02 | +0.51% |
| RYKKY | $36.83 | +5.23% | 9.8B | 27.49 | $1.34 | +0.20% |
| SRGHY | $15.70 | -0.02% | 8.5B | 22.43 | $0.70 | +2.16% |
| SRHGF | $15.57 | -21.06% | 8.4B | 22.24 | $0.70 | +2.66% |
Stock Comparison
BONTQ vs AONNY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while AONNY trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 133.61. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to AONNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs SVTMF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SVTMF trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SVTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs AONNF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while AONNF trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to AONNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs MAKSF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MAKSF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while MAKSF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKSF's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAKSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to MAKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs MAKSY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while MAKSY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs SMKUY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SMKUY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SMKUY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMKUY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMKUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SMKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs RYKKY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RYKKY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while RYKKY trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYKKY's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYKKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to RYKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs SRGHY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SRGHY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs SRHGF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SRHGF trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SRHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs IMHDF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and IMHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs TOKUY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while TOKUY trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to TOKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs RYKKF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while RYKKF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to RYKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs TOKUF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while TOKUF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to TOKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs WLWHF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to WLWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs INREF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while INREF trades at $29.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and INREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs LRENY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LRENY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs WLWHY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while WLWHY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and WLWHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs JFROF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while JFROF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and JFROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs SURRY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SURRY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and SURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs LENTY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LENTY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs SURRF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SURRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SURRF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SURRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SURRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs PMDKY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PMDKY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PMDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs TKSHF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while TKSHF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to TKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs PGCMF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PGCMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PGCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs PPASF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PPASF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 131.98. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs GDNEF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs PMDKF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PMDKF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PMDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs PKPYY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PKPYY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PKPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs RRETY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 934.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while RRETY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to RRETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs LCMRF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 849.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LCMRF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to LCMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs CBDBY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while CBDBY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to CBDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs WHGPF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while WHGPF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to WHGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs LHUAF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LHUAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs NWRLY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while NWRLY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and NWRLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs PKSGY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while PKSGY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to PKSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs HDVTY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while HDVTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and HDVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs VEST Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while VEST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEST's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to VEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs SRSCQ Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ is less volatile compared to SRSCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BONTQ.
BONTQ vs SHLDQ Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SHLDQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and SHLDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs LFSYY Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LFSYY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LFSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BONTQ vs LFSYF Comparison
BONTQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BONTQ stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LFSYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BONTQ is priced at $0.00, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BONTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, BONTQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BONTQ and LFSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).