Botswana Diamonds plc
Botswana Diamonds plc (BOD.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BOD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOD.L | £0.28 | -1.79% | 3.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FRES.L | £1,689.00 | +1.08% | 12.4B | 36.72 | £0.46 | +3.94% |
| POLY.L | £215.00 | +30.30% | 1B | -4.48 | -£0.48 | N/A |
| THS.L | £90.00 | -1.10% | 267.5M | 7.50 | £0.12 | +3.88% |
| EEE.L | £38.00 | +0.00% | 262.3M | -38.00 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| SLP.L | £75.00 | +0.67% | 195.1M | 25.00 | £0.03 | +2.33% |
| EUA.L | £4.43 | -0.45% | 130.6M | -4.42 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| GMET.L | £74.00 | +15.63% | 123.9M | -74.00 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| GEM.L | £5.75 | +0.00% | 99.1M | -1.15 | -£0.05 | N/A |
| HEX.L | £25.75 | -4.63% | 48M | -25.75 | -£0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BOD.L vs FRES.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while FRES.L trades at £1,689.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check FRES.L's competition here
BOD.L vs POLY.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while POLY.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BOD.L has daily volatility of 7.14 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check POLY.L's competition here
BOD.L vs THS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while THS.L trades at £90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check THS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs EEE.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while EEE.L trades at £38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check EEE.L's competition here
BOD.L vs SLP.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while SLP.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check SLP.L's competition here
BOD.L vs EUA.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while EUA.L trades at £4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check EUA.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GMET.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while GMET.L trades at £74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GMET.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GEM.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while GEM.L trades at £5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GEM.L's competition here
BOD.L vs HEX.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while HEX.L trades at £25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check HEX.L's competition here
BOD.L vs PDL.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while PDL.L trades at £22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check PDL.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0V7B.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while 0V7B.L trades at £0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0V7B.L's competition here
BOD.L vs COBR.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while COBR.L trades at £3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check COBR.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0V6Y.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while 0V6Y.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0V6Y.L's competition here
BOD.L vs UFO.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while UFO.L trades at £0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check UFO.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0A4V.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while 0A4V.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0A4V.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GEMD.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while GEMD.L trades at £7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GEMD.L's competition here
BOD.L vs FME.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while FME.L trades at £0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check FME.L's competition here
BOD.L vs ROCK.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while ROCK.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check ROCK.L's competition here
BOD.L vs CMRS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while CMRS.L trades at £2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check CMRS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs FMET.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while FMET.L trades at £3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check FMET.L's competition here
BOD.L vs URAH.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while URAH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check URAH.L's competition here
BOD.L vs SEFA.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while SEFA.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check SEFA.L's competition here
BOD.L vs NTVO.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while NTVO.L trades at £0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check NTVO.L's competition here
BOD.L vs KDR.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while KDR.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check KDR.L's competition here
BOD.L vs BRD.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while BRD.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BOD.L has daily volatility of 7.14 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check BRD.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GEMR.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GEMR.L has a market cap of 617.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while GEMR.L trades at £0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GEMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GEMR.L's competition here
BOD.L vs PERE.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while PERE.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check PERE.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GPSS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GPSS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while GPSS.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GPSS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs ALS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ALS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while ALS.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check ALS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0UH1.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, 0UH1.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while 0UH1.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0UH1.L's competition here
BOD.L vs DNK.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DNK.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.28, while DNK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check DNK.L's competition here