Botswana Diamonds plc
Botswana Diamonds plc (BOD.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BOD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOD.L | £0.36 | +0.00% | 4.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FRES.L | £1,400.00 | -2.10% | 10.3B | 100.00 | £0.14 | +1.42% |
| POLY.L | £215.00 | +30.30% | 1B | -4.48 | -£0.48 | N/A |
| THS.L | £90.00 | -2.17% | 265.7M | 6.92 | £0.13 | +3.84% |
| EEE.L | £28.25 | +10.78% | 195M | -28.25 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| SLP.L | £70.20 | -3.17% | 182.6M | 23.40 | £0.03 | +2.55% |
| EUA.L | £4.18 | -3.91% | 123.2M | -4.17 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| GEM.L | £5.75 | +6.98% | 107.2M | -1.15 | -£0.05 | N/A |
| GMET.L | £56.00 | -5.88% | 83.3M | -56.00 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| HEX.L | £23.75 | -3.06% | 44.3M | -23.75 | -£0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BOD.L vs FRES.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while FRES.L trades at £1,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check FRES.L's competition here
BOD.L vs POLY.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while POLY.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BOD.L has daily volatility of 5.56 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check POLY.L's competition here
BOD.L vs THS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while THS.L trades at £90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check THS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs EEE.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while EEE.L trades at £28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -28.25. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check EEE.L's competition here
BOD.L vs SLP.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 182.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while SLP.L trades at £70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check SLP.L's competition here
BOD.L vs EUA.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while EUA.L trades at £4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check EUA.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GEM.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while GEM.L trades at £5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GEM.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GMET.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while GMET.L trades at £56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GMET.L's competition here
BOD.L vs HEX.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while HEX.L trades at £23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check HEX.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0V7B.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while 0V7B.L trades at £0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0V7B.L's competition here
BOD.L vs PDL.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while PDL.L trades at £12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check PDL.L's competition here
BOD.L vs COBR.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while COBR.L trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check COBR.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0V6Y.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while 0V6Y.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0V6Y.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0A4V.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while 0A4V.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0A4V.L's competition here
BOD.L vs UFO.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while UFO.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check UFO.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GEMD.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while GEMD.L trades at £6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GEMD.L's competition here
BOD.L vs FME.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while FME.L trades at £0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check FME.L's competition here
BOD.L vs ROCK.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while ROCK.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check ROCK.L's competition here
BOD.L vs FMET.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while FMET.L trades at £3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check FMET.L's competition here
BOD.L vs URAH.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while URAH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check URAH.L's competition here
BOD.L vs SEFA.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while SEFA.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check SEFA.L's competition here
BOD.L vs CMRS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while CMRS.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check CMRS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs KDR.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while KDR.L trades at £0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check KDR.L's competition here
BOD.L vs BRD.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while BRD.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BOD.L has daily volatility of 5.56 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check BRD.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GEMR.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GEMR.L has a market cap of 694.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while GEMR.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to GEMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GEMR.L's competition here
BOD.L vs NTVO.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 437.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while NTVO.L trades at £0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check NTVO.L's competition here
BOD.L vs PERE.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while PERE.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check PERE.L's competition here
BOD.L vs 0UH1.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, 0UH1.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while 0UH1.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check 0UH1.L's competition here
BOD.L vs ALS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ALS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while ALS.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check ALS.L's competition here
BOD.L vs DNK.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, DNK.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while DNK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check DNK.L's competition here
BOD.L vs GPSS.L Comparison August 2025
BOD.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOD.L stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GPSS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOD.L is priced at £0.36, while GPSS.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOD.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOD.L's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOD.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOD.L.Check GPSS.L's competition here