Benefit One Inc.
Benefit One Inc. (BNTOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNTOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNTOF | $13.70 | +13.13% | 0 | 0.00 | $5,006,621.00 | N/A |
| RCRRF | $60.65 | +0.66% | 89B | 33.51 | $1.81 | +0.27% |
| RCRUY | $11.71 | -2.98% | 86B | 32.58 | $0.36 | +0.18% |
| RANJY | $23.49 | +0.09% | 16.4B | 93.56 | $0.25 | +5.33% |
| AHEXY | $15.36 | -0.52% | 10.3B | 15.36 | $1.00 | +3.91% |
| RANJF | $41.27 | +10.35% | 7.2B | 82.54 | $0.50 | +7.66% |
| SKLTY | $31.50 | +2.44% | 5.4B | 190.81 | $0.16 | +1.69% |
| AHEXF | $30.05 | +1.86% | 5B | 15.33 | $1.96 | +4.02% |
| TEMPF | $1.79 | +10.49% | 4B | 17.90 | $0.10 | +0.02% |
| TCCPY | $6.72 | +2.75% | 3.4B | 29.36 | $0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BNTOF vs RCRRF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, RCRRF has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while RCRRF trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RCRRF's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCRRF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to RCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check RCRRF's competition here
BNTOF vs RCRUY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, RCRUY has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while RCRUY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RCRUY's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to RCRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check RCRUY's competition here
BNTOF vs RANJY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, RANJY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while RANJY trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RANJY's P/E ratio is 93.56. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RANJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to RANJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check RANJY's competition here
BNTOF vs AHEXY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, AHEXY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while AHEXY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas AHEXY's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHEXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to AHEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check AHEXY's competition here
BNTOF vs RANJF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, RANJF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while RANJF trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RANJF's P/E ratio is 82.54. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RANJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to RANJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check RANJF's competition here
BNTOF vs SKLTY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, SKLTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while SKLTY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas SKLTY's P/E ratio is 190.81. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKLTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to SKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check SKLTY's competition here
BNTOF vs AHEXF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, AHEXF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while AHEXF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas AHEXF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHEXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to AHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check AHEXF's competition here
BNTOF vs TEMPF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, TEMPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while TEMPF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas TEMPF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEMPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to TEMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check TEMPF's competition here
BNTOF vs TCCPY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, TCCPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while TCCPY trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas TCCPY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCCPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to TCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check TCCPY's competition here
BNTOF vs TXHPF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, TXHPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while TXHPF trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas TXHPF's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TXHPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to TXHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check TXHPF's competition here
BNTOF vs MPGPY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, MPGPY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while MPGPY trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MPGPY's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPGPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to MPGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check MPGPY's competition here
BNTOF vs MEITF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, MEITF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while MEITF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MEITF's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEITF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to MEITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check MEITF's competition here
BNTOF vs HAYPY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, HAYPY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while HAYPY trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HAYPY's P/E ratio is -74.17. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAYPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to HAYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check HAYPY's competition here
BNTOF vs MPGPF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, MPGPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while MPGPF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MPGPF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPGPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to MPGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check MPGPF's competition here
BNTOF vs IGPPF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, IGPPF has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while IGPPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas IGPPF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to IGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check IGPPF's competition here
BNTOF vs ENJPY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, ENJPY has a market cap of 373.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while ENJPY trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas ENJPY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENJPY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to ENJPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check ENJPY's competition here
BNTOF vs TGDLF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, TGDLF has a market cap of 309.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while TGDLF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas TGDLF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGDLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to TGDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check TGDLF's competition here
BNTOF vs CAEEF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, CAEEF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while CAEEF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CAEEF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAEEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to CAEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check CAEEF's competition here
BNTOF vs LTNC Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, LTNC has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while LTNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas LTNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LTNC's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to LTNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check LTNC's competition here
BNTOF vs CWLPF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, CWLPF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while CWLPF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CWLPF's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWLPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to CWLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check CWLPF's competition here
BNTOF vs RLBY Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, RLBY has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while RLBY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RLBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLBY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to RLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check RLBY's competition here
BNTOF vs TREP Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, TREP has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while TREP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas TREP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TREP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to TREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check TREP's competition here
BNTOF vs MCTH Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, MCTH has a market cap of 784K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while MCTH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MCTH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCTH's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to MCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check MCTH's competition here
BNTOF vs FTRS Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, FTRS has a market cap of 733.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while FTRS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FTRS's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to FTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check FTRS's competition here
BNTOF vs RVLTF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, RVLTF has a market cap of 521K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while RVLTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RVLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to RVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check RVLTF's competition here
BNTOF vs WDHR Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, WDHR has a market cap of 467.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while WDHR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas WDHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDHR's ROE of +2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to WDHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check WDHR's competition here
BNTOF vs PBHG Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, PBHG has a market cap of 459.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while PBHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas PBHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is less volatile compared to PBHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check PBHG's competition here
BNTOF vs HIRRF Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, HIRRF has a market cap of 413.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while HIRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HIRRF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIRRF's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to HIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check HIRRF's competition here
BNTOF vs GXXM Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, GXXM has a market cap of 240.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while GXXM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas GXXM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GXXM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to GXXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check GXXM's competition here
BNTOF vs SSET Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, SSET has a market cap of 82.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while SSET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas SSET's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSET's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to SSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check SSET's competition here
BNTOF vs CTPR Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, CTPR has a market cap of 875. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while CTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTPR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to CTPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check CTPR's competition here
BNTOF vs NZIH Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, NZIH has a market cap of 223. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while NZIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas NZIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NZIH's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to NZIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check NZIH's competition here
BNTOF vs FRSI Comparison August 2025
BNTOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNTOF stands at 0. In comparison, FRSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNTOF is priced at $13.70, while FRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNTOF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FRSI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BNTOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNTOF is more volatile compared to FRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNTOF.Check FRSI's competition here