Global Gaming Technologies Corp.
Global Gaming Technologies Corp. BLKCF Peers
See (BLKCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLKCF | $0.00 | N/A | 1224.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NTDOF | $80.53 | -0.59% | 93.76B | 49.10 | $1.64 | +1.26% |
| NTDOY | $19.76 | -3.89% | 92.02B | 48.19 | $0.41 | +0.29% |
| NETTF | $21.63 | +1.07% | 68.77B | 17.17 | $1.26 | +2.39% |
| KONMY | $65.00 | -2.93% | 17.62B | 32.50 | $2.00 | +0.20% |
| NEXOY | $17.86 | +11.14% | 14.49B | 16.24 | $1.10 | +0.00% |
| NEXOF | $17.40 | +10.83% | 14.12B | 15.40 | $1.13 | +0.01% |
| CCOEF | $27.18 | -0.01% | 11.37B | 52.27 | $0.52 | +1.00% |
| CCOEY | $12.88 | -2.78% | 10.78B | 33.03 | $0.39 | +0.45% |
| BLBLF | $18.10 | N/A | 7.47B | -41.14 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BLKCF vs NTDOF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 93.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NTDOF trades at $80.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 49.10. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs NTDOY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 92.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NTDOY trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 48.19. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs NETTF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 68.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NETTF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs KONMY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 17.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while KONMY trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs NEXOY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NEXOY trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs NEXOF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 14.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NEXOF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs CCOEF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while CCOEF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs CCOEY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 10.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while CCOEY trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs BLBLF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while BLBLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -41.14. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SQNNY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SQNNY trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 80.16. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SQNXF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SQNXF trades at $58.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 79.79. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs KSFTF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs OTGLF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while OTGLF trades at $62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 54.22. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs OTGLY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while OTGLY trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 52.93. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SGAMY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SGAMY trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SGAMF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SGAMF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs BCDMF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs KYYWF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs DNACF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while DNACF trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs THQQF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while THQQF trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs PRXXF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while PRXXF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs MIXIF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while MIXIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs UBSFY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while UBSFY trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -26.89. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs UBSFF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while UBSFF trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs KYYWY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs XDNCF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GREZF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GUNGF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 939.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GUNGF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs RVTTY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs IGGGF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 554.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs TSVNF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs STLFF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 353.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while STLFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs BLITF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while BLITF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SCFR Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 299.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SCFR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs RMDEF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 275.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while RMDEF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -225.22. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs BOYAF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 227.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while BOYAF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs AKAFF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs FRRDF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs ENADF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 106.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while ENADF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs FGRTF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GENTF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 80.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GENTF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs PONGF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 68.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while PONGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs IDGAF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs POPRF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs EAGRF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 26.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while EAGRF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GAMGF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs VSQTF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 13.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while VSQTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs ZUKI Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 12.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while ZUKI trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SMPBF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SRVTF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SCTGF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs WIGAF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs ENDRF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs NVNT Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVNT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs YDRMF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GGAMF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs PRYNF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs TAPM Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while TAPM trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GMETF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GMETF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs ATIG Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 889430.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SWMIF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742244.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs EPYFF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 707487.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs FRZT Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 675504.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs KSMRF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 672250.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs IMGX Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642041.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs APETF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 510582.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while APETF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs WGRFF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 444087.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs IENT Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405670.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs TIIDF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131075.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs COUV Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62507.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs CLIS Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34329.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs NTEK Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17865.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs STIE Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 16988.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs LIVC Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16291.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs PLGC Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 13944.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs WINRW Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9484.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs GMGT Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9140.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs ADTR Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4416.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs VRVR Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4126.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SPYR Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF and SPYR have similar daily volatility (163.64).
BLKCF vs AXNVF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2559.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF and AXNVF have similar daily volatility (163.64).
BLKCF vs WINR Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2371.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs HTSF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1800.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs TERA Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1348.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TERA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs SPLY Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1187.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs IPUB Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1040.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs FASDF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 840.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs RIVX Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.
BLKCF vs YVRLF Comparison
BLKCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLKCF stands at 1224.00. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483.00. Regarding current trading prices, BLKCF is priced at $0.00, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLKCF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLKCF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLKCF is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLKCF.