Blockchain Foundry Inc.
Blockchain Foundry Inc. BLFDF Peers
See (BLFDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLFDF | $0.07 | +75.00% | 0 | 2.80 | $0.03 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $23.86 | +8.55% | 42.4B | 30.59 | $0.78 | +0.80% |
| FJTSY | $23.38 | -0.49% | 41.5B | 29.97 | $0.78 | +0.45% |
| NTDTY | $27.23 | -1.02% | 38.2B | 38.90 | $0.70 | N/A |
| NIPNF | $27.75 | -4.31% | 37B | 30.49 | $0.91 | +0.67% |
| NTTDF | $24.82 | +0.00% | 34.8B | 35.97 | $0.69 | +0.36% |
| CGEMY | $34.29 | +0.15% | 29.1B | 15.73 | $2.18 | +2.18% |
| CAPMF | $170.86 | +0.46% | 29B | 15.53 | $11.00 | +2.26% |
| NURAF | $38.81 | -1.17% | 22.2B | 34.35 | $1.13 | +1.11% |
| NRILY | $38.61 | -1.09% | 22.1B | 34.17 | $1.13 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
BLFDF vs FJTSF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while FJTSF trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs FJTSY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while FJTSY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NTDTY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NTDTY trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NIPNF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NIPNF trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NTTDF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NTTDF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CGEMY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CGEMY trades at $34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CAPMF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CAPMF trades at $170.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NURAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NURAF trades at $38.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NRILY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NRILY trades at $38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs WIZEY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while WIZEY trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs WPLCF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while WPLCF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs TISNF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while TISNF trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ISMAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ISMAF trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs RPYTF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DUSXF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs BECTY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while BECTY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs BHTLF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while BHTLF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CTLPP Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CTLPP trades at $60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 2005.00. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SPSAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SPSAF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs TSYHY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while TSYHY trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs TSYHF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while TSYHF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ISMAY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ISMAY trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NWITY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NWKLF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NSSXF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SLNTY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NCRRP Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SESPF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SESPF trades at $121.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NTCYF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NONEY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NONEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NDTAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NDTAF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ATEAY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ATEAY trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs HLTEF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while HLTEF trades at $71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CFTLF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CFTLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DLGEF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DLGEF trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ATAZF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CRAYF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CRAYF trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CCCMF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DTSOF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DTSOF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs KSUEF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs KAHTY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs NGRRF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 935.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while NGRRF trades at $71.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ADSGF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CTSDF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs TRCLF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs FDRVF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -25.11. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs AEXAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while AEXAF trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DTATF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DTATF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DCHIF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DCHIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs GBDMF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CMTUF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DTTLY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DTTLY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CEJOF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs AEXAY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 368.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while AEXAY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs APMRF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 344.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while APMRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CSYJF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 336.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CSYJF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs FDDMF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while FDDMF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SLUNF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SVPLF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs EMCHF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while EMCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CSYJY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SSCC Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SSCC trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ITFRF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs APXYY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while APXYY trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs APPEF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while APPEF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs FCCN Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while FCCN trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -42.67. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ALYAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ALYAF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is 185.00. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ALVNF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs ULPRF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DCHIY Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DCHIY trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs QUISF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs GSDT Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while GSDT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs QSCGF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs KDCXF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs EAXR Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while EAXR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CXGEF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CXGEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs HLEO Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while HLEO trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs BNXAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while BNXAF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SEBFF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CNGFF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CNGFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is less volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SNELF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SPOFF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SPOFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs MLBEF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while MLBEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CPIHF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CPIHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is less volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs KTHGF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs WYLDF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs POSAF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while POSAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs XTMIF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DRGV Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs VSSSF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while VSSSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF and VSSSF have similar daily volatility (85.71).
BLFDF vs DVRNF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs KNRLF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs DCSX Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs BRQSF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while BRQSF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs CRCW Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SKTCF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs FUUN Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while FUUN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SNOIF Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.
BLFDF vs SEAV Comparison
BLFDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLFDF stands at 0. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BLFDF is priced at $0.07, while SEAV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLFDF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, BLFDF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BLFDF is more volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLFDF.