BHP Group Limited
BHP Group Limited BHP.L Peers
See (BHP.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP.L | £2,018.00 | +4.67% | 100.9B | 12.13 | £1.64 | +4.70% |
| 0L5V.L | £338.52 | +0.04% | 86.5B | 50.13 | £6.89 | +1.08% |
| 0R2J.L | £162.72 | -0.04% | 82.3B | 69.48 | £2.34 | +1.52% |
| 0L8B.L | £98.12 | +1.67% | 79.2B | 22.30 | £4.42 | +2.70% |
| RIO.L | £4,713.50 | +5.04% | 78.7B | 8.76 | £5.26 | +6.73% |
| 0IFA.L | £270.46 | +0.67% | 76.1B | 69.91 | £3.84 | +0.94% |
| 0HBH.L | £297.31 | +1.09% | 65.9B | 29.47 | £10.04 | +2.42% |
| GLEN.L | £322.55 | +6.26% | 37.2B | -34.75 | -£0.09 | +4.45% |
| 0K9L.L | £143.64 | +2.92% | 33B | 5.14 | £27.80 | +1.54% |
| 0Z4C.L | £231.20 | -2.78% | 32.8B | 35.01 | £6.60 | +1.78% |
Stock Comparison
BHP.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0L5V.L trades at £338.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 50.13. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R2J.L trades at £162.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 69.48. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0L8B.L trades at £98.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs RIO.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while RIO.L trades at £4,713.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0IFA.L trades at £270.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 69.91. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0HBH.L trades at £297.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while GLEN.L trades at £322.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -34.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0K9L.L trades at £143.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0NHS.L trades at £59.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0KEI.L trades at £114.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs AAL.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while AAL.L trades at £2,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0EDD.L trades at £64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0HQU.L trades at £91.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R07.L trades at £40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0UGS.L trades at £34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -81.85. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0K3B.L trades at £36.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0LVK.L trades at £84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0KXS.L trades at £157.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0LJ9.L trades at £54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0HC7.L trades at £81.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0IF3.L trades at £78.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0HCB.L trades at £31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs S32.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while S32.L trades at £147.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -36.70. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0U6C.L trades at £29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0HUR.L trades at £58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0QYN.L trades at £4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R0U.L trades at £9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -89.43. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0AHJ.L trades at £13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -22.74. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0IK3.L trades at £42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VBE.L trades at £28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -178.77. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0I0H.L trades at £11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0L45.L trades at £68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VGM.L trades at £13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 63.08. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R0A.L trades at £6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 201.67. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VL5.L trades at £44.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VGE.L trades at £17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BHP.L has daily volatility of 13.33 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
BHP.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0QYM.L trades at £9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VOA.L trades at £17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R2C.L trades at £7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 73.73. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0HWG.L trades at £13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0NZN.L trades at £788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0QZ2.L trades at £6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 983M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while ADT1.L trades at £288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 724.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VIK.L trades at £3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 714.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0JZT.L trades at £11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -82.10. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0G5B.L trades at £124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 552.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0O6D.L trades at £14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 508.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R20.L trades at £1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 429.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0KD1.L trades at £3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -36.83. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs GFM.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while GFM.L trades at £185.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 46.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs KMR.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while KMR.L trades at £327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs PRE.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while PRE.L trades at £85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -44.90. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs SVML.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while SVML.L trades at £37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 222.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while SOLG.L trades at £7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0P07.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0RRC.L trades at £4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while CAPD.L trades at £94.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while ECOR.L trades at £71.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs BSE.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0V46.L trades at £0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs TRR.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0VNO.L trades at £0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs KP2.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while KP2.L trades at £2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs JLP.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while JLP.L trades at £3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs MKA.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while MKA.L trades at £32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while CUSN.L trades at £8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs RBW.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while RBW.L trades at £13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs SAV.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while SAV.L trades at £3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0QQR.L trades at £15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs KOD.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while KOD.L trades at £0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0QVG.L trades at £5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs ALL.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while ALL.L trades at £8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs HE1.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while HE1.L trades at £0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs ATM.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while ATM.L trades at £2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs KAV.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while KAV.L trades at £1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs MET1.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while MET1.L trades at £10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs FAR.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while FAR.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs ARS.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while ARS.L trades at £1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 0UVX.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while ZNWD.L trades at £5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs NMT.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while 1SN.L trades at £5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs CRCL.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while CRCL.L trades at £0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs GSP.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs TUN.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TUN.L has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while TUN.L trades at £11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas TUN.L's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TUN.L's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is less volatile compared to TUN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.
BHP.L vs POW.L Comparison
BHP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.L stands at 100.9B. In comparison, POW.L has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.L is priced at £2,018.00, while POW.L trades at £13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas POW.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.L's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POW.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.L is more volatile compared to POW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.L.