BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Limited

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 218.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CAIXY trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CAIXY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CIHKY trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CIHKY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 153.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CIHHF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while UNCFF trades at $81.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check UNCFF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while UNCRY trades at $40.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check UNCRY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while IITSF trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check IITSF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while DBSDF trades at $39.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check DBSDF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while DBSDY trades at $157.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check DBSDY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BNPQY trades at $48.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BNPQY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BNPQF trades at $96.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BNPQF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while KBCSY trades at $60.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check KBCSY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SBKFF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while MZHOF trades at $31.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check MZHOF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while EBKDY trades at $50.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check EBKDY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BREJY trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BREJY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CIXPF trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CIXPF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check AKSJF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while LLOBF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check LLOBF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PSBKF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PBCRY trades at $13.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PBCRY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while LLDTF trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check LLDTF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CHCJY trades at $17.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CHCJY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while OVCHY trades at $26.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check OVCHY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CRARY trades at $9.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CRARY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CHBJF trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CHBJF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CRARF trades at $19.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CRARF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PBCRF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PBCRF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while OVCHF trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check OVCHF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while NBNKF trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check NBNKF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while NRDBY trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check NRDBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SCGLY trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SCGLY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BNKHF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BNKHF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CRZBY trades at $43.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CRZBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CRZBF trades at $42.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CRZBF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while UOVEF trades at $28.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check UOVEF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while STNDF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check STNDF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SCGLF trades at $67.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SCGLF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while UOVEY trades at $54.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check UOVEY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while JPPTY trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check JPPTY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CWESF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CWESF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while JPSTF trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check JPSTF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while KBCSF trades at $105.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check KBCSF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while DNBBF trades at $27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check DNBBF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while DNBBY trades at $26.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check DNBBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while EBKOF trades at $100.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check EBKOF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKRKY trades at $12.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKRKY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SVKEF trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SVKEF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while DNKEY trades at $21.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check DNKEY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while DNSKF trades at $42.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check DNSKF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SWDBY trades at $28.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY and SWDBY have similar daily volatility (0.24).Check SWDBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SWDBF trades at $28.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SWDBF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKRKF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKRKF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PSZKF trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PSZKF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PSZKY trades at $23.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PSZKY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BLMIF trades at $19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BLMIF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CGMBF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CGMBF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PPERY trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PPERY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while JPPHY trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check JPPHY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while MLYNF trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check MLYNF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check JPHLF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CEBCF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CEBCF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PPERF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PPERF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while HSNGY trades at $14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check HSNGY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while MLYBY trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check MLYBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while HSNGF trades at $14.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check HSNGF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CMAKY trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CMAKY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while GBOOF trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check GBOOF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while GBOOY trades at $44.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check GBOOY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while FCNCB trades at $1,650.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check FCNCB's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKHYY trades at $92.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKHYY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKHPF trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKHPF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CKHGY trades at $100.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CKHGY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while RSNHF trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check RSNHF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SGBLY trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SGBLY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SBGOF trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SBGOF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BPXXY trades at $21.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BPXXY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BDORY trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BDORY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SUTNY trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SUTNY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while MDIBY trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check MDIBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CMTDF trades at $28.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CMTDF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while AIBGY trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check AIBGY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CKHGF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while ISNPY trades at $39.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check ISNPY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while MDIBF trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check MDIBF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while CIMDF trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check CIMDF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check PBLOF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while AIBRF trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check AIBRF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BNCZF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BDOUF trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BDOUF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while GPFOF trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check GPFOF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check SKCBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKPKF trades at $56.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKPKF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check GPFOY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKRIY trades at $15.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKRIY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKRIF trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKRIF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while TKGBY trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check TKGBY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while EGFEY trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check EGFEY's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while EGFEF trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check EGFEF's competition here

BHKLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BHKLY stands at 50.3B. In comparison, BKNIY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHKLY is priced at $95.16, while BKNIY trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BHKLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BKNIY's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, BHKLY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKNIY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHKLY is less volatile compared to BKNIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHKLY.Check BKNIY's competition here