Better For You Wellness, Inc.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while QMIS trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to QMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while GSHN trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to GSHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while KATX trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CCYC trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CCYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, PBAJ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while PBAJ trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PBAJ's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to PBAJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to PBAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WCHS trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WPCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while NOTR trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 490.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while DVTC trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to DVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while FZRO trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to FZRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while RGLG trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CINV trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AMRR trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AMRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while BTOW trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to BTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while KAST trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while SCGX trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while RMGCF trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -20.04. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AOAO trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while TRFE trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to TRFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while NMTT trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to NMTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while TGLO trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WWHC trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WWHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CHAAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CMCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while XITO trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CREEF trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WAYS trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CAHO trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -179.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ACBD trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while SSHT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -17.66. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while PTCP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to PTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ATMS trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ATMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while MDWK trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -22.90. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AASP trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while JMTM trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while KWACW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to KWACW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while KWAC trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to KWAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, FDHC has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while FDHC trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FDHC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to FDHC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to FDHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WBQNL trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while GWIN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to GWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AVNI trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CNXX trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CNXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while XTPT trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CNWHF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CNWHF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNWHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CNWHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to CNWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, OOGI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while OOGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OOGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to OOGI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to OOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while IDIG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AGSS trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while XCPT trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while NPFC trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to NPFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CBBB trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ADCV trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ADCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while EVTK trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -510.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while FWFW trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while GTVI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to GTVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while BOREF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to BOREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, UGHB has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while UGHB trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UGHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to UGHB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to UGHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while STLY trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WRPT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ECGR trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ELLH trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while USBL trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while TCRI trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while PSCO trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while NIHL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while BDCM trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AZRH trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while SLTN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to SLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while PCMC trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while LWLW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to LWLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ITRX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ITRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while GIPL trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ADIA trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ADIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, GFOO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while GFOO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GFOO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to GFOO's ROE of +42.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to GFOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while NGRC trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AWCA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while LRGR trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CAVG has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CAVG trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAVG's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CAVG's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CAVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while FUNR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while NRCD trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to NRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ASNB trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while WNFT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, FSTJ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while FSTJ trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FSTJ's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to FSTJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to FSTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, PVRS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while PVRS trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PVRS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to PVRS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to PVRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ARAT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ARAT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARAT's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ARAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ARAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while MTRI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, SMPP has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while SMPP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMPP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to SMPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to SMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while SITS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while HKBT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while XSVT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to XSVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while GDVM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ENGA trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ENGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, IWSH has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while IWSH trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IWSH's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to IWSH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to IWSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, HBIE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while HBIE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HBIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to HBIE's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to HBIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, AVVH has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while AVVH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to AVVH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to AVVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, SMEV has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while SMEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to SMEV's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to SMEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while ATMH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.

BFYW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFYW stands at 508. In comparison, CRVH has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFYW is priced at $0.00, while CRVH trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRVH's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BFYW's ROE is +0.85%, compared to CRVH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFYW is more volatile compared to CRVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFYW.