Befesa S.A.
Befesa S.A. BFSAF Peers
See (BFSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFSAF | $25.35 | N/A | 1.21B | 17.60 | $1.44 | +3.19% |
| VEOEF | $36.70 | N/A | 26.79B | 21.09 | $1.74 | +3.87% |
| VEOEY | $16.90 | -3.04% | 24.67B | 19.43 | $0.87 | +3.13% |
| FMOCF | $10.30 | N/A | 4.68B | 13.73 | $0.75 | +6.48% |
| TMRAY | $14.30 | +1.42% | 4.23B | 39.72 | $0.36 | +0.93% |
| TMRAF | $14.04 | -12.20% | 4.15B | 39.00 | $0.36 | +1.48% |
| TSPCF | $1.52 | -20.00% | 3.39B | 38.00 | $0.04 | +1.88% |
| CHFFF | $0.47 | N/A | 2.89B | 6.71 | $0.07 | +6.00% |
| SECYF | $9.60 | +3.95% | 2.22B | 14.12 | $0.68 | +3.00% |
| DSKIF | $24.83 | +0.02% | 1.19B | 18.40 | $1.35 | +0.92% |
Stock Comparison
BFSAF vs VEOEF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, VEOEF has a market cap of 26.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while VEOEF trades at $36.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VEOEF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to VEOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs VEOEY Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, VEOEY has a market cap of 24.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while VEOEY trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VEOEY's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEOEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to VEOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs FMOCF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FMOCF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while FMOCF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas FMOCF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to FMOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TMRAY Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TMRAY has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TMRAY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TMRAY's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMRAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TMRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TMRAF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TMRAF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TMRAF trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TMRAF's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMRAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TSPCF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TSPCF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TSPCF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TSPCF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSPCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CHFFF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CHFFF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CHFFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CHFFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to CHFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SECYF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SECYF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SECYF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SECYF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SECYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SECYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs DSKIF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, DSKIF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while DSKIF trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas DSKIF's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSKIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to DSKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TNJIF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TNJIF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TNJIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TNJIF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNJIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TNJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs FMOCY Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, FMOCY has a market cap of 909.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while FMOCY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas FMOCY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to FMOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SECVY Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SECVY has a market cap of 809.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SECVY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SECVY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SECVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SECVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SHMCF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SHMCF has a market cap of 620.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SHMCF trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SHMCF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHMCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SHMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SZDEF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SZDEF has a market cap of 571.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SZDEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SZDEF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SZDEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SZDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CHFFY Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CHFFY has a market cap of 301.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CHFFY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CHFFY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHFFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to CHFFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SCPJ Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SCPJ has a market cap of 297.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SCPJ trades at $325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SCPJ's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCPJ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SCPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs AGXXF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AGXXF has a market cap of 274.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while AGXXF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas AGXXF's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGXXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to AGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs MBRFF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MBRFF has a market cap of 243.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while MBRFF trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas MBRFF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBRFF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to MBRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs QNTFF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, QNTFF has a market cap of 172.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while QNTFF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas QNTFF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QNTFF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to QNTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ANRGF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ANRGF has a market cap of 144.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ANRGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ANRGF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANRGF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to ANRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs BTQNF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BTQNF has a market cap of 44.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while BTQNF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas BTQNF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTQNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to BTQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GCEI Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GCEI has a market cap of 43.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GCEI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GCEI's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCEI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to GCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ROOOF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ROOOF has a market cap of 34.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ROOOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ROOOF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROOOF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to ROOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs VCIGF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, VCIGF has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while VCIGF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas VCIGF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VCIGF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to VCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs LEIC Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, LEIC has a market cap of 17.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while LEIC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas LEIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LEIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to LEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SEPOF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SEPOF has a market cap of 17.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SEPOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SEPOF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEPOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SEPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CTRNF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CTRNF has a market cap of 13.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CTRNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CTRNF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTRNF's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to CTRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ECLMF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ECLMF has a market cap of 12.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ECLMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ECLMF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECLMF's ROE of -9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to ECLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TESI Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TESI has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TESI trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TESI's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TESI's ROE of -13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs BCCEF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BCCEF has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while BCCEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas BCCEF's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCCEF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to BCCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs NWLXF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NWLXF has a market cap of 6.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while NWLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas NWLXF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWLXF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to NWLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CWSFF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CWSFF has a market cap of 6.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CWSFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CWSFF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CWSFF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to CWSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs HUIPF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, HUIPF has a market cap of 6.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while HUIPF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas HUIPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUIPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to HUIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs HNRC Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, HNRC has a market cap of 6.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while HNRC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas HNRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to HNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs EAATF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EAATF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while EAATF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EAATF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EAATF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to EAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs OCLN Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, OCLN has a market cap of 3.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while OCLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas OCLN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCLN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to OCLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs EQTE Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EQTE has a market cap of 2.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while EQTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EQTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQTE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to EQTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs AFBG Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, AFBG has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while AFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas AFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to AFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SNRG Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SNRG has a market cap of 2.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SNRG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SNRG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNRG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SENR Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SENR has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SENR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SENR's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SENR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs EXSO Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EXSO has a market cap of 877120.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while EXSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EXSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXSO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to EXSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs PTOI Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, PTOI has a market cap of 761012.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while PTOI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas PTOI's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTOI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to PTOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs BWPC Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BWPC has a market cap of 639500.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while BWPC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas BWPC's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWPC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to BWPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CRVYF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CRVYF has a market cap of 631412.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CRVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CRVYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRVYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to CRVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs MCIM Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MCIM has a market cap of 505926.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while MCIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas MCIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCIM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to MCIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GARB Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GARB has a market cap of 474976.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GARB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to GARB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GERS Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GERS has a market cap of 346308.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GERS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GERS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to GERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs DGWR Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, DGWR has a market cap of 251966.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while DGWR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas DGWR's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DGWR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to DGWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ECEZ Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ECEZ has a market cap of 250617.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ECEZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ECEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to ECEZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ECPL Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ECPL has a market cap of 201688.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ECPL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ECPL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECPL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to ECPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs JPEX Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, JPEX has a market cap of 167269.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while JPEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas JPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPEX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to JPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs USLQ Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, USLQ has a market cap of 146097.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while USLQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas USLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to USLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs RGDEF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, RGDEF has a market cap of 69359.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while RGDEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas RGDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGDEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to RGDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs MJWL Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MJWL has a market cap of 65199.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while MJWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas MJWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MJWL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to MJWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs BEEN Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BEEN has a market cap of 30867.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while BEEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas BEEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEEN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to BEEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs UVSS Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, UVSS has a market cap of 28605.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while UVSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas UVSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UVSS's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to UVSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs EVSP Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EVSP has a market cap of 28583.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while EVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to EVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CLIRF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CLIRF has a market cap of 25507.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CLIRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CLIRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLIRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to CLIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs NXSI Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NXSI has a market cap of 20022.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while NXSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas NXSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NXSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to NXSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GMND Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GMND has a market cap of 19173.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GMND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GMND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to GMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs EXPL Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, EXPL has a market cap of 16744.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while EXPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas EXPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXPL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to EXPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SUNC Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 14606.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SUNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TMEN Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TMEN has a market cap of 13576.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TMEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TMEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TMEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GNCC Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GNCC has a market cap of 9449.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GNCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GNCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to GNCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs IPWG Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, IPWG has a market cap of 8184.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while IPWG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas IPWG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to IPWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs NWMH Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, NWMH has a market cap of 6892.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while NWMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas NWMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWMH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to NWMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs BEHL Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, BEHL has a market cap of 6564.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while BEHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas BEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to BEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CESX Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CESX has a market cap of 4702.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CESX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CESX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CESX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to CESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs CIWT Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, CIWT has a market cap of 1534.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while CIWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas CIWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIWT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to CIWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ECCI Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ECCI has a market cap of 581.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ECCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ECCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to ECCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GETH Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GETH has a market cap of 314.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GETH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to GETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TRTI Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TRTI has a market cap of 298.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TRTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TRTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to TRTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs SRPX Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, SRPX has a market cap of 206.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while SRPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas SRPX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to SRPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs GRNO Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, GRNO has a market cap of 92.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while GRNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas GRNO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to GRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs TRITF Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, TRITF has a market cap of 85.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while TRITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas TRITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is less volatile compared to TRITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs MPHD Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, MPHD has a market cap of 33.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while MPHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas MPHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to MPHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.
BFSAF vs ALAN Comparison
BFSAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFSAF stands at 1.21B. In comparison, ALAN has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, BFSAF is priced at $25.35, while ALAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.60, whereas ALAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFSAF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFSAF is more volatile compared to ALAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFSAF.