Basic-Fit N.V.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, CDA.PA has a market cap of 899.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while CDA.PA trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas CDA.PA's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDA.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to CDA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, BEN.PA has a market cap of 658.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while BEN.PA trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas BEN.PA's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BEN.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is less volatile compared to BEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, OLG.PA has a market cap of 361.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while OLG.PA trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas OLG.PA's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLG.PA's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is less volatile compared to OLG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, MLCMB.PA has a market cap of 151.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while MLCMB.PA trades at $168.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas MLCMB.PA's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLCMB.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to MLCMB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, ALPDX.PA has a market cap of 114.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while ALPDX.PA trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas ALPDX.PA's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALPDX.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to ALPDX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, ALRFG.PA has a market cap of 113.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while ALRFG.PA trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas ALRFG.PA's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALRFG.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to ALRFG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, SMAR.BR has a market cap of 99.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while SMAR.BR trades at $28.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas SMAR.BR's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMAR.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to SMAR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, ABEO.PA has a market cap of 63.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while ABEO.PA trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas ABEO.PA's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABEO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to ABEO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, ALMND.PA has a market cap of 63.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while ALMND.PA trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas ALMND.PA's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALMND.PA's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is more volatile compared to ALMND.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, MLIFS.PA has a market cap of 60.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while MLIFS.PA trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas MLIFS.PA's P/E ratio is -233.33. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLIFS.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is less volatile compared to MLIFS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, SNOW.AS has a market cap of 41.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while SNOW.AS trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas SNOW.AS's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNOW.AS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is less volatile compared to SNOW.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, ALLEX.PA has a market cap of 34.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while ALLEX.PA trades at $4.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas ALLEX.PA's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALLEX.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is less volatile compared to ALLEX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.

BFIT.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFIT.AS stands at 1.43B. In comparison, ALCYB.PA has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BFIT.AS is priced at $21.72, while ALCYB.PA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFIT.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.00, whereas ALCYB.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFIT.AS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALCYB.PA's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BFIT.AS is less volatile compared to ALCYB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFIT.AS.