Beneficial Holdings, Inc.
Beneficial Holdings, Inc. BFHJ Peers
See (BFHJ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFHJ | $0.00 | +50.00% | 282 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BKFAF | $7.01 | N/A | 97B | N/A | N/A | +15.09% |
| BROXF | $13.85 | N/A | 97B | N/A | N/A | +8.21% |
| BXDIF | $8.42 | N/A | 97B | N/A | N/A | +12.74% |
| BAMGF | $13.60 | N/A | 97B | 5.56 | $2.45 | +4.26% |
| BAMKF | $12.50 | N/A | 97B | 5.11 | $2.45 | +5.50% |
| BKAMF | $14.33 | N/A | 95B | N/A | N/A | +9.86% |
| IVSBF | $30.04 | +1.59% | 92.2B | 20.44 | $1.47 | +1.67% |
| IVSXF | $29.74 | N/A | 90.9B | 20.23 | $1.47 | +1.67% |
| TGOPY | $29.07 | -0.69% | 56.1B | 8.23 | $3.53 | +1.43% |
Stock Comparison
BFHJ vs BKFAF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BKFAF has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BKFAF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKFAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to BKFAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BROXF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BROXF has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BROXF trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BROXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to BROXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BXDIF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BXDIF has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BXDIF trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BXDIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to BXDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BAMGF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BAMGF has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BAMGF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMGF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAMGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to BAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BAMKF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BAMKF has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BAMKF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMKF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAMKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BAMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs BKAMF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BKAMF has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BKAMF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKAMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKAMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BKAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs IVSBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IVSBF has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IVSBF trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVSBF's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVSBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IVSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IVSXF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IVSXF has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IVSXF trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVSXF's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVSXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IVSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs TGOPY Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TGOPY has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TGOPY trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOPY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGOPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to TGOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs TGOPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TGOPF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TGOPF trades at $57.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOPF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGOPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and TGOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs VNGDF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, VNGDF has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while VNGDF trades at $113.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and VNGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs PGPHF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, PGPHF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while PGPHF trades at $1,319.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPHF's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGPHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to PGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs EQBBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, EQBBF has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while EQBBF trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQBBF's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to EQBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs LGGNF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, LGGNF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while LGGNF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGNF's P/E ratio is 88.38. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to LGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IHPCF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IHPCF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IHPCF trades at $60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHPCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IHPCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and IHPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs BKFPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BKFPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BKFPF trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKFPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKFPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BKFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs IVTBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IVTBF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IVTBF trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTBF's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IVTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs STMZF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, STMZF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while STMZF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMZF's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STMZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and STMZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs AMDUF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, AMDUF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while AMDUF trades at $70.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMDUF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMDUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to AMDUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IDTVF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IDTVF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IDTVF trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTVF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IDTVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IDTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs JBAXY Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, JBAXY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while JBAXY trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBAXY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBAXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to JBAXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs JBARF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, JBARF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while JBARF trades at $64.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBARF's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBARF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to JBARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IDDTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IDDTF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IDDTF trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDDTF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IDDTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IDDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs HALFF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, HALFF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while HALFF trades at $142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALFF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HALFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and HALFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs LBGUF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, LBGUF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while LBGUF trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBGUF's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LBGUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to LBGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs GBLBY Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, GBLBY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while GBLBY trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLBY's P/E ratio is 313.67. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBLBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and GBLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs GSCE Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, GSCE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while GSCE trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GSCE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to GSCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs GBLBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, GBLBF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while GBLBF trades at $82.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLBF's P/E ratio is 305.37. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBLBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to GBLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs PSHZF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, PSHZF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while PSHZF trades at $53.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHZF's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSHZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to PSHZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs SBHGF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, SBHGF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while SBHGF trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBHGF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to SBHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs STJPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, STJPF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while STJPF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STJPF's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STJPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to STJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs MGPUF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, MGPUF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while MGPUF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPUF's P/E ratio is -17.62. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGPUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to MGPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs SFNXF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, SFNXF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while SFNXF trades at $237.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFNXF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFNXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to SFNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs ICGUF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ICGUF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ICGUF trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICGUF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICGUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to ICGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IGIFF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IGIFF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IGIFF trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGIFF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IGIFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IGIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs SHNWF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, SHNWF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while SHNWF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNWF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHNWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to SHNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs FLIVF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, FLIVF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while FLIVF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLIVF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLIVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and FLIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs IVPEF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IVPEF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IVPEF trades at $131.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVPEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IVPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs ECVTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ECVTF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ECVTF trades at $106.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECVTF's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECVTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and ECVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs DAXXF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, DAXXF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while DAXXF trades at $159.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and DAXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs ALITF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ALITF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ALITF trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALITF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALITF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to ALITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs AFOVF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, AFOVF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while AFOVF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFOVF's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFOVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and AFOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs HRGLF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, HRGLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while HRGLF trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRGLF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRGLF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to HRGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs EUZOF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, EUZOF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while EUZOF trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUZOF's P/E ratio is -85.42. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EUZOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to EUZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs HRGLY Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, HRGLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while HRGLY trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRGLY's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRGLY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to HRGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs HSXUF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, HSXUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while HSXUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSXUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSXUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and HSXUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs ISRPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ISRPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ISRPF trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISRPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to ISRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs ONEXF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ONEXF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ONEXF trades at $78.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEXF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONEXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to ONEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs CCGDF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, CCGDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while CCGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCGDF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCGDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to CCGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs TTBXF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TTBXF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TTBXF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTBXF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTBXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and TTBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs SLFPY Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, SLFPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while SLFPY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLFPY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLFPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to SLFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs VUKEF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, VUKEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while VUKEF trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VUKEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to VUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs SLFPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, SLFPF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while SLFPF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLFPF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLFPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and SLFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs REVNF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, REVNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while REVNF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REVNF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REVNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to REVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs AZIHF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, AZIHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while AZIHF trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZIHF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AZIHF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to AZIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs WNDLF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, WNDLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while WNDLF trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNDLF's P/E ratio is -29.40. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WNDLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and WNDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs RMGOF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, RMGOF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while RMGOF trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGOF's P/E ratio is 100.34. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RMGOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to RMGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs VONHF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, VONHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while VONHF trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONHF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VONHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to VONHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs TKKHF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TKKHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TKKHF trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKKHF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKKHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to TKKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs RITPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, RITPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while RITPF trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITPF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RITPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to RITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs AMSPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, AMSPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while AMSPF trades at $117.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to AMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs MEIEF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, MEIEF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while MEIEF trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEIEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEIEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and MEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs VGDDF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, VGDDF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while VGDDF trades at $110.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGDDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VGDDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to VGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs PVVLF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, PVVLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while PVVLF trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVVLF's P/E ratio is 119.90. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PVVLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and PVVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs NINTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, NINTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while NINTF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINTF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINTF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to NINTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BMMWF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BMMWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BMMWF trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMMWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMMWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BMMWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs MNKIF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, MNKIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while MNKIF trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNKIF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNKIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to MNKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BBAGF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BBAGF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BBAGF trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBAGF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBAGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to BBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs TKCPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TKCPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TKCPF trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKCPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKCPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to TKCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IXSRF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IXSRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IXSRF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IXSRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IXSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs QUILF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, QUILF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while QUILF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUILF's P/E ratio is -60.58. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QUILF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to QUILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs BZSPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BZSPF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BZSPF trades at $65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BZSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs TXEMF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TXEMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TXEMF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXEMF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TXEMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and TXEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs RTBBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, RTBBF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while RTBBF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTBBF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and RTBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs CRPFY Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, CRPFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while CRPFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPFY's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRPFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and CRPFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs CALEF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, CALEF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while CALEF trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALEF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CALEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and CALEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs ENDTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ENDTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ENDTF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENDTF's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENDTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to ENDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs ISMCF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ISMCF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ISMCF trades at $621.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to ISMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs JTCPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, JTCPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while JTCPF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTCPF's P/E ratio is -198.33. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JTCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and JTCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs WTNTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, WTNTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while WTNTF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTNTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and WTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs SFFFF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, SFFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while SFFFF trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFFFF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to SFFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs FFXDF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, FFXDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while FFXDF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFXDF's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FFXDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to FFXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs FECHF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, FECHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while FECHF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FECHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to FECHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs EHITF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, EHITF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while EHITF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHITF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EHITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and EHITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs BHMDF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BHMDF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BHMDF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHMDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHMDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BHMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs AJMPF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, AJMPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while AJMPF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJMPF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AJMPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to AJMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs ISCMF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, ISCMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while ISCMF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISCMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and ISCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs PPTTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, PPTTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while PPTTF trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPTTF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPTTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and PPTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs BWMTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BWMTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BWMTF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BWMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs UCPLF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, UCPLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while UCPLF trades at $97.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCPLF's P/E ratio is -65.52. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UCPLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and UCPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs AVGTF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, AVGTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while AVGTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to AVGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs CYMBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, CYMBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while CYMBF trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYMBF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and CYMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs BLGFF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, BLGFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while BLGFF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLGFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and BLGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs RTOBF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, RTOBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while RTOBF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTOBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and RTOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs IHRMF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IHRMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IHRMF trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IHRMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to IHRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs TGONF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, TGONF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while TGONF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGONF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGONF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and TGONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs FSEN Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, FSEN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while FSEN trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSEN's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSEN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ is less volatile compared to FSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFHJ.
BFHJ vs IGBSF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, IGBSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while IGBSF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IGBSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and IGBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BFHJ vs MGLLF Comparison
BFHJ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFHJ stands at 282. In comparison, MGLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFHJ is priced at $0.00, while MGLLF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFHJ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLLF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BFHJ's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BFHJ and MGLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).