BevCanna Enterprises Inc.

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, COLA.NE has a market cap of 410.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while COLA.NE trades at CA$25.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas COLA.NE's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to COLA.NE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN and COLA.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, PRMW.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while PRMW.TO trades at CA$37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PRMW.TO's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to PRMW.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN is less volatile compared to PRMW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEV.CN.

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, LAS-A.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while LAS-A.TO trades at CA$229.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LAS-A.TO's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to LAS-A.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN is less volatile compared to LAS-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEV.CN.

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, GURU.TO has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while GURU.TO trades at CA$1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GURU.TO's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to GURU.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN is less volatile compared to GURU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEV.CN.

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, WTER.CN has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while WTER.CN trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WTER.CN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to WTER.CN's ROE of -6.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN and WTER.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, JSDA.CN has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while JSDA.CN trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JSDA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to JSDA.CN's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN and JSDA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, FLOW.TO has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while FLOW.TO trades at CA$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FLOW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to FLOW.TO's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN and FLOW.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, NEVI.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while NEVI.CN trades at CA$0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NEVI.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to NEVI.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN is less volatile compared to NEVI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEV.CN.

BEV.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEV.CN stands at 10.9M. In comparison, MILK.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEV.CN is priced at CA$0.66, while MILK.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MILK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, BEV.CN's ROE is +6.97%, compared to MILK.CN's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BEV.CN and MILK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).