Beijing North Star Company Limited

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CDVM has a market cap of 270.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CDVM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CDVM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CDVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CDVM's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SUHJY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SUHJY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SUHJY's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SUHJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SUHJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SUHJY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SUHJF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SUHJF trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SUHJF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SUHJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SUHJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SUHJF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CRBJY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CRBJY trades at $35.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CRBJY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRBJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CRBJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CRBJY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CRBJF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CRBJF trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CRBJF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRBJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CRBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CRBJF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DWAHY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while DWAHY trades at $35.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas DWAHY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DWAHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to DWAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check DWAHY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DWAHF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while DWAHF trades at $33.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas DWAHF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DWAHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to DWAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check DWAHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CAOVF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CAOVF trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CAOVF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAOVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CAOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CAOVF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CAOVY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CAOVY trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CAOVY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAOVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CAOVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CAOVY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CNGKY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CNGKY trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CNGKY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CNGKY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CNGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CNGKY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CHKGF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CHKGF trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CHKGF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHKGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CHKGF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, PDGRY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while PDGRY trades at $200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas PDGRY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PDGRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to PDGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check PDGRY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, HNGKY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while HNGKY trades at $30.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas HNGKY's P/E ratio is -41.04. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HNGKY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to HNGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check HNGKY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, HKHGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while HKHGF trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas HKHGF's P/E ratio is -40.73. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HKHGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to HKHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check HKHGF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CHVKF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CHVKF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CHVKF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHVKF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CHVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CHVKF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DWHHF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while DWHHF trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas DWHHF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DWHHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to DWHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check DWHHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SNLAY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SNLAY trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SNLAY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SNLAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SNLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SNLAY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CTPVF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CTPVF trades at $19.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CTPVF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CTPVF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CTPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CTPVF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, LGFRY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while LGFRY trades at $14.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas LGFRY's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LGFRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to LGFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check LGFRY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SNLAF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SNLAF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SNLAF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SNLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SNLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SNLAF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, WARFY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while WARFY trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas WARFY's P/E ratio is -20.19. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WARFY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to WARFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check WARFY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, LNGPF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while LNGPF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas LNGPF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LNGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to LNGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check LNGPF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, WARFF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while WARFF trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas WARFF's P/E ratio is -19.38. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WARFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to WARFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check WARFF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, AYAAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while AYAAF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas AYAAF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AYAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to AYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check AYAAF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SCCCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SCCCF trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SCCCF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SCCCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SCCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SCCCF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CWQXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CWQXY trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CWQXY's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CWQXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CWQXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CWQXY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CWQXF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CWQXF trades at $11.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CWQXF's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CWQXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CWQXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CWQXF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CHVKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CHVKY trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CHVKY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHVKY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CHVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CHVKY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CDEVY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CDEVY trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CDEVY's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CDEVY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CDEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CDEVY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DTCWY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while DTCWY trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas DTCWY's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DTCWY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to DTCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check DTCWY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, UOLGY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while UOLGY trades at $23.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas UOLGY's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to UOLGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to UOLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check UOLGY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SZENF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SZENF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SZENF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SZENF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SZENF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, UOLGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while UOLGF trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas UOLGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to UOLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to UOLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check UOLGF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KRYPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while KRYPF trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas KRYPF's P/E ratio is 50.33. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KRYPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to KRYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check KRYPF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CTRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CTRYY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CTRYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CTRYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CTRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CTRYY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CTRYF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CTRYF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CTRYF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CTRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CTRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CTRYF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KRYPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while KRYPY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas KRYPY's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KRYPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to KRYPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check KRYPY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CDEVF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CDEVF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CDEVF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CDEVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CDEVF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CFFHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CFFHF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CFFHF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CFFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CFFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CFFHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SHMAY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SHMAY trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SHMAY's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SHMAY's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to SHMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SHMAY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, BRKFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while BRKFF trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas BRKFF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BRKFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to BRKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check BRKFF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, EGRNY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while EGRNY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas EGRNY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EGRNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to EGRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check EGRNY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CAIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CAIAF trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CAIAF's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAIAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CAIAF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GTWCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GTWCF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GTWCF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GTWCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to GTWCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GTWCF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SIMEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SIMEF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SIMEF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SIMEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to SIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SIMEF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, ARLLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while ARLLF trades at $81.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas ARLLF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to ARLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check ARLLF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CJNHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CJNHF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CJNHF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CJNHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CJNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CJNHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, FRSHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while FRSHY trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas FRSHY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FRSHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to FRSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check FRSHY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, BSPDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while BSPDY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas BSPDY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BSPDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to BSPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check BSPDY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, LDHUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while LDHUF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas LDHUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LDHUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to LDHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check LDHUF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, RBLAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while RBLAY trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas RBLAY's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RBLAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to RBLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check RBLAY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, MGAWF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while MGAWF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas MGAWF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MGAWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to MGAWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check MGAWF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, MGAWY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while MGAWY trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas MGAWY's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MGAWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to MGAWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check MGAWY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, YLDGF has a market cap of 936.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while YLDGF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas YLDGF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YLDGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to YLDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check YLDGF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SZNTF has a market cap of 881M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SZNTF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SZNTF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SZNTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SZNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SZNTF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GZUHF has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GZUHF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GZUHF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GZUHF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to GZUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GZUHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, AGPYF has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while AGPYF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas AGPYF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AGPYF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to AGPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check AGPYF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SIOPF has a market cap of 802.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SIOPF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SIOPF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SIOPF's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SIOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SIOPF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CAOYF has a market cap of 778.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CAOYF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CAOYF's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAOYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CAOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CAOYF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KWHAF has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while KWHAF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas KWHAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KWHAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to KWHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check KWHAF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, TIACF has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while TIACF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas TIACF's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TIACF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to TIACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check TIACF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, YLDGY has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while YLDGY trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas YLDGY's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YLDGY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to YLDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check YLDGY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SOLLF has a market cap of 682.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SOLLF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SOLLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SOLLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SOLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SOLLF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, PHKIF has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while PHKIF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas PHKIF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PHKIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to PHKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check PHKIF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DRUNF has a market cap of 645.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while DRUNF trades at $15.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas DRUNF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DRUNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to DRUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check DRUNF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, LPHHF has a market cap of 608M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while LPHHF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas LPHHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LPHHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to LPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check LPHHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CCLHF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CCLHF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CCLHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CCLHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CCLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CCLHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, AYAAY has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while AYAAY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas AYAAY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AYAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to AYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check AYAAY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CDCTF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CDCTF trades at $12.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CDCTF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CDCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CDCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CDCTF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, WFICF has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while WFICF trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas WFICF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WFICF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to WFICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check WFICF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, AGPYY has a market cap of 344.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while AGPYY trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas AGPYY's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AGPYY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to AGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check AGPYY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, MODVF has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while MODVF trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas MODVF's P/E ratio is 49.59. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MODVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to MODVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check MODVF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, FRTCF has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while FRTCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas FRTCF's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FRTCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to FRTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check FRTCF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KWGPF has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while KWGPF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas KWGPF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KWGPF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to KWGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check KWGPF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GNLAF has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GNLAF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GNLAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GNLAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to GNLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GNLAF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, TMPPF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while TMPPF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas TMPPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TMPPF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to TMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check TMPPF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, DRSLF has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while DRSLF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas DRSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DRSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to DRSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check DRSLF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, YUZHF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while YUZHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas YUZHF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YUZHF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to YUZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check YUZHF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GCCO has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GCCO trades at $1,700.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GCCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to GCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GCCO's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, FHRT has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while FHRT trades at $24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas FHRT's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FHRT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to FHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check FHRT's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, BAKBF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while BAKBF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas BAKBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BAKBF's ROE of +3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to BAKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check BAKBF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GZUHY has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GZUHY trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GZUHY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GZUHY's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to GZUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GZUHY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SIUDF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SIUDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SIUDF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SIUDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SIUDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SIUDF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, KDCCF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while KDCCF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas KDCCF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KDCCF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to KDCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check KDCCF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, ILAL has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while ILAL trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas ILAL's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ILAL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to ILAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check ILAL's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SOLLY has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SOLLY trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SOLLY's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SOLLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SOLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SOLLY's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, SRRE has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while SRRE trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas SRRE's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SRRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to SRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check SRRE's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, YTRGF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while YTRGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas YTRGF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YTRGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to YTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check YTRGF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, UCASU has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while UCASU trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas UCASU's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to UCASU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to UCASU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check UCASU's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, HIHI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while HIHI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas HIHI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HIHI's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to HIHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check HIHI's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, URBDF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while URBDF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas URBDF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to URBDF's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to URBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check URBDF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, RGSG has a market cap of 911.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while RGSG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas RGSG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RGSG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to RGSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check RGSG's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, FLLLF has a market cap of 399.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while FLLLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas FLLLF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FLLLF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to FLLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check FLLLF's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GRLT has a market cap of 366.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GRLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GRLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GRLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to GRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GRLT's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, CHIT has a market cap of 188.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while CHIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas CHIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to CHIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check CHIT's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, GLCO has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while GLCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas GLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GLCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to GLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check GLCO's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, BAYP has a market cap of 37.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while BAYP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas BAYP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BAYP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to BAYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check BAYP's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, BPCP has a market cap of 33.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while BPCP trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas BPCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BPCP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is more volatile compared to BPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check BPCP's competition here

BEIJF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BEIJF stands at 543.1M. In comparison, MTPP has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BEIJF is priced at $0.08, while MTPP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BEIJF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.67, whereas MTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEIJF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MTPP's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BEIJF is less volatile compared to MTPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEIJF.Check MTPP's competition here