Beeyu Overseas Limited
Beeyu Overseas Limited (BEEYU.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BEEYU.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEEYU.BO | ₹2.62 | -1.87% | 37.1M | -43.67 | -₹0.06 | N/A |
| BAJAJFINSV.NS | ₹2,051.60 | -0.34% | 3.3T | 34.25 | ₹59.90 | +0.05% |
| BAJAJFINSV.BO | ₹2,051.05 | -0.34% | 3.3T | 34.19 | ₹59.99 | +0.05% |
| ABCAPITAL.BO | ₹346.30 | +0.35% | 906.7B | 26.06 | ₹13.29 | N/A |
| ABCAPITAL.NS | ₹346.20 | +0.39% | 906.4B | 26.07 | ₹13.28 | N/A |
| AIIL.BO | ₹501.60 | -0.85% | 426B | 11.72 | ₹42.80 | +0.30% |
| PEL.BO | ₹1,124.60 | +0.25% | 254.9B | 44.24 | ₹25.42 | +0.98% |
| INDIGRID-IV.NS | ₹164.42 | +0.06% | 156.6B | N/A | N/A | +9.79% |
| INDIGRID.NS | ₹164.42 | +15.01% | 118.7B | 42.20 | ₹3.37 | +8.51% |
| ELCIDIN.BO | ₹109,725.00 | -0.39% | 21.9B | 16.86 | ₹6,509.87 | +0.02% |
Stock Comparison
BEEYU.BO vs BAJAJFINSV.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, BAJAJFINSV.NS has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while BAJAJFINSV.NS trades at ₹2,051.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas BAJAJFINSV.NS's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BAJAJFINSV.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJFINSV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check BAJAJFINSV.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs BAJAJFINSV.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, BAJAJFINSV.BO has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while BAJAJFINSV.BO trades at ₹2,051.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas BAJAJFINSV.BO's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BAJAJFINSV.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJFINSV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check BAJAJFINSV.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ABCAPITAL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ABCAPITAL.BO has a market cap of 906.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ABCAPITAL.BO trades at ₹346.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ABCAPITAL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABCAPITAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to ABCAPITAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ABCAPITAL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ABCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ABCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 906.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ABCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹346.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ABCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABCAPITAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to ABCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ABCAPITAL.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs AIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, AIIL.BO has a market cap of 426B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while AIIL.BO trades at ₹501.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas AIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AIIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to AIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check AIIL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs PEL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, PEL.BO has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while PEL.BO trades at ₹1,124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas PEL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to PEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check PEL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs INDIGRID-IV.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, INDIGRID-IV.NS has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while INDIGRID-IV.NS trades at ₹164.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas INDIGRID-IV.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INDIGRID-IV.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGRID-IV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check INDIGRID-IV.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs INDIGRID.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, INDIGRID.NS has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while INDIGRID.NS trades at ₹164.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas INDIGRID.NS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INDIGRID.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGRID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check INDIGRID.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ELCIDIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ELCIDIN.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ELCIDIN.BO trades at ₹109,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ELCIDIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELCIDIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to ELCIDIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ELCIDIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ZSARACOM.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ZSARACOM.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ZSARACOM.BO trades at ₹11,754.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ZSARACOM.BO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZSARACOM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to ZSARACOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ZSARACOM.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs CENTRUM.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, CENTRUM.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while CENTRUM.BO trades at ₹24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas CENTRUM.BO's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CENTRUM.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to CENTRUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check CENTRUM.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs CENTRUM.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, CENTRUM.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while CENTRUM.NS trades at ₹24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas CENTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CENTRUM.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to CENTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check CENTRUM.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs CREST.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, CREST.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while CREST.NS trades at ₹342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas CREST.NS's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CREST.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to CREST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check CREST.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs CREST.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, CREST.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while CREST.BO trades at ₹339.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas CREST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CREST.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to CREST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check CREST.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs RELCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, RELCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while RELCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas RELCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RELCAPITAL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to RELCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check RELCAPITAL.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs IVC.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, IVC.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while IVC.BO trades at ₹7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas IVC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IVC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to IVC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check IVC.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs IVC.NS Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, IVC.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while IVC.NS trades at ₹7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas IVC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IVC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to IVC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check IVC.NS's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs YASTF.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, YASTF.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while YASTF.BO trades at ₹150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas YASTF.BO's P/E ratio is 185.19. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YASTF.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to YASTF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check YASTF.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ABVL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ABVL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ABVL.BO trades at ₹7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ABVL.BO's P/E ratio is -85.22. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABVL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to ABVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ABVL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs INTELLCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, INTELLCAP.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while INTELLCAP.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas INTELLCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 1097.56. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INTELLCAP.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to INTELLCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check INTELLCAP.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs GLOBUSCON.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, GLOBUSCON.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while GLOBUSCON.BO trades at ₹13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas GLOBUSCON.BO's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLOBUSCON.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to GLOBUSCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check GLOBUSCON.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs RSDFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, RSDFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while RSDFIN.BO trades at ₹96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas RSDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to RSDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check RSDFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ZMILGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ZMILGFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ZMILGFIN.BO trades at ₹54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ZMILGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZMILGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to ZMILGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ZMILGFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs AGVENTURES.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, AGVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while AGVENTURES.BO trades at ₹116.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas AGVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to AGVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check AGVENTURES.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs FERVENTSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, FERVENTSYN.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while FERVENTSYN.BO trades at ₹20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas FERVENTSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FERVENTSYN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to FERVENTSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check FERVENTSYN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs YAMNINV.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, YAMNINV.BO has a market cap of 736M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while YAMNINV.BO trades at ₹0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas YAMNINV.BO's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YAMNINV.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to YAMNINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check YAMNINV.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs APOORVA.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, APOORVA.BO has a market cap of 724.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while APOORVA.BO trades at ₹36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas APOORVA.BO's P/E ratio is -362.90. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to APOORVA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to APOORVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check APOORVA.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs REGIS.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, REGIS.BO has a market cap of 665.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while REGIS.BO trades at ₹2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas REGIS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REGIS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to REGIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check REGIS.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MORGAN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MORGAN.BO has a market cap of 603M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MORGAN.BO trades at ₹60.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MORGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MORGAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MORGAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MORGAN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs TOYAMSL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, TOYAMSL.BO has a market cap of 560.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while TOYAMSL.BO trades at ₹0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas TOYAMSL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TOYAMSL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to TOYAMSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check TOYAMSL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs NCLRESE.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, NCLRESE.BO has a market cap of 470.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while NCLRESE.BO trades at ₹0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas NCLRESE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCLRESE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to NCLRESE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check NCLRESE.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs LERTHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, LERTHAI.BO has a market cap of 427M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while LERTHAI.BO trades at ₹610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas LERTHAI.BO's P/E ratio is -174.29. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LERTHAI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to LERTHAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check LERTHAI.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs OASISEC.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, OASISEC.BO has a market cap of 338.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while OASISEC.BO trades at ₹18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas OASISEC.BO's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OASISEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to OASISEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check OASISEC.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MIL.BO has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MIL.BO trades at ₹32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MIL.BO's P/E ratio is 3295.00. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MIL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs KKFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, KKFIN.BO has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while KKFIN.BO trades at ₹58.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas KKFIN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KKFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to KKFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check KKFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MONOT.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MONOT.BO has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MONOT.BO trades at ₹0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MONOT.BO's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MONOT.BO's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MONOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MONOT.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs KARTKIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, KARTKIN.BO has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while KARTKIN.BO trades at ₹1,256.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas KARTKIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KARTKIN.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to KARTKIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check KARTKIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs QGO.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, QGO.BO has a market cap of 301.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while QGO.BO trades at ₹43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas QGO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QGO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to QGO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check QGO.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs JOHNPHARMA.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, JOHNPHARMA.BO has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while JOHNPHARMA.BO trades at ₹0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas JOHNPHARMA.BO's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JOHNPHARMA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to JOHNPHARMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check JOHNPHARMA.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MARGOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MARGOFIN.BO has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MARGOFIN.BO trades at ₹63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MARGOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 186.47. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MARGOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MARGOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MARGOFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs TCFCFINQ.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, TCFCFINQ.BO has a market cap of 288.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while TCFCFINQ.BO trades at ₹27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas TCFCFINQ.BO's P/E ratio is 131.10. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TCFCFINQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to TCFCFINQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check TCFCFINQ.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MORARKFI.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MORARKFI.BO has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MORARKFI.BO trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MORARKFI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MORARKFI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MORARKFI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MORARKFI.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs INDCEMCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, INDCEMCAP.BO has a market cap of 266.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while INDCEMCAP.BO trades at ₹12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas INDCEMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 153.63. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INDCEMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to INDCEMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check INDCEMCAP.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs EASUN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, EASUN.BO has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while EASUN.BO trades at ₹49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas EASUN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.93. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EASUN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to EASUN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check EASUN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs STRLGUA.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, STRLGUA.BO has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while STRLGUA.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas STRLGUA.BO's P/E ratio is -136.84. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STRLGUA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to STRLGUA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check STRLGUA.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs BOMTALKIES.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, BOMTALKIES.BO has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while BOMTALKIES.BO trades at ₹4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas BOMTALKIES.BO's P/E ratio is -114.75. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BOMTALKIES.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to BOMTALKIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check BOMTALKIES.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs SWRNASE.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, SWRNASE.BO has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while SWRNASE.BO trades at ₹81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas SWRNASE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SWRNASE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to SWRNASE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check SWRNASE.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs HRMNYCP.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, HRMNYCP.BO has a market cap of 241.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while HRMNYCP.BO trades at ₹80.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas HRMNYCP.BO's P/E ratio is -66.55. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HRMNYCP.BO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to HRMNYCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check HRMNYCP.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs SOUTLAT.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, SOUTLAT.BO has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while SOUTLAT.BO trades at ₹32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas SOUTLAT.BO's P/E ratio is 94.12. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOUTLAT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to SOUTLAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check SOUTLAT.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs INVIGO.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, INVIGO.BO has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while INVIGO.BO trades at ₹5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas INVIGO.BO's P/E ratio is -92.17. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INVIGO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to INVIGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check INVIGO.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs GLOBALCA.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, GLOBALCA.BO has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while GLOBALCA.BO trades at ₹0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas GLOBALCA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLOBALCA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to GLOBALCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check GLOBALCA.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs PRESSURS.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, PRESSURS.BO has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while PRESSURS.BO trades at ₹1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas PRESSURS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRESSURS.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to PRESSURS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check PRESSURS.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs SHYMINV.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, SHYMINV.BO has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while SHYMINV.BO trades at ₹13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas SHYMINV.BO's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHYMINV.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to SHYMINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check SHYMINV.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs CHITRTX.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, CHITRTX.BO has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while CHITRTX.BO trades at ₹119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas CHITRTX.BO's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHITRTX.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to CHITRTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check CHITRTX.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs GSLSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, GSLSEC.BO has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while GSLSEC.BO trades at ₹53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas GSLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -54.70. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GSLSEC.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to GSLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check GSLSEC.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs DFL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, DFL.BO has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while DFL.BO trades at ₹45.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas DFL.BO's P/E ratio is 70.55. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DFL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to DFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check DFL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs TOKYOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, TOKYOFIN.BO has a market cap of 154M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while TOKYOFIN.BO trades at ₹22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas TOKYOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 368.33. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TOKYOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to TOKYOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check TOKYOFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs CITL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, CITL.BO has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while CITL.BO trades at ₹0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas CITL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CITL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to CITL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check CITL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs PRISMMEDI.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, PRISMMEDI.BO has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while PRISMMEDI.BO trades at ₹23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas PRISMMEDI.BO's P/E ratio is -338.57. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRISMMEDI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to PRISMMEDI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check PRISMMEDI.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs GARBIFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, GARBIFIN.BO has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while GARBIFIN.BO trades at ₹12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas GARBIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GARBIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to GARBIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check GARBIFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MINOLTAF.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MINOLTAF.BO has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MINOLTAF.BO trades at ₹1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MINOLTAF.BO's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MINOLTAF.BO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MINOLTAF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MINOLTAF.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs ECSTSTL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, ECSTSTL.BO has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while ECSTSTL.BO trades at ₹18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas ECSTSTL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECSTSTL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to ECSTSTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check ECSTSTL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs GALADAFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, GALADAFIN.BO has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while GALADAFIN.BO trades at ₹28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas GALADAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GALADAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to GALADAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check GALADAFIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs JAYBHCR.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, JAYBHCR.BO has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while JAYBHCR.BO trades at ₹15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas JAYBHCR.BO's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JAYBHCR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to JAYBHCR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check JAYBHCR.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs AGARWAL.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, AGARWAL.BO has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while AGARWAL.BO trades at ₹22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas AGARWAL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.37. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGARWAL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to AGARWAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check AGARWAL.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MFSINTRCRP.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MFSINTRCRP.BO has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MFSINTRCRP.BO trades at ₹17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MFSINTRCRP.BO's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MFSINTRCRP.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to MFSINTRCRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MFSINTRCRP.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MLINDLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MLINDLTD.BO has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MLINDLTD.BO trades at ₹10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MLINDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLINDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to MLINDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MLINDLTD.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs GANHOLD.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, GANHOLD.BO has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while GANHOLD.BO trades at ₹66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas GANHOLD.BO's P/E ratio is -25.48. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GANHOLD.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to GANHOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check GANHOLD.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs AMERISE.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, AMERISE.BO has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while AMERISE.BO trades at ₹0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas AMERISE.BO's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMERISE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is less volatile compared to AMERISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check AMERISE.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs KUBERJI.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, KUBERJI.BO has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while KUBERJI.BO trades at ₹12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas KUBERJI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KUBERJI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to KUBERJI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check KUBERJI.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs MAHANIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, MAHANIN.BO has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while MAHANIN.BO trades at ₹9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas MAHANIN.BO's P/E ratio is -106.56. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAHANIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to MAHANIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check MAHANIN.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs SHYAMAINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, SHYAMAINFO.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while SHYAMAINFO.BO trades at ₹7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas SHYAMAINFO.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHYAMAINFO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAMAINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check SHYAMAINFO.BO's competition here
BEEYU.BO vs SHYAM.BO Comparison February 2026
BEEYU.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEEYU.BO stands at 37.1M. In comparison, SHYAM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BEEYU.BO is priced at ₹2.62, while SHYAM.BO trades at ₹8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEEYU.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -43.67, whereas SHYAM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEEYU.BO's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHYAM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEEYU.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEEYU.BO.Check SHYAM.BO's competition here