Bertrandt AG
Bertrandt AG BDT.DE Peers
See (BDT.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDT.DE | €22.05 | -0.90% | 222.8M | -2.14 | -€10.32 | +1.13% |
| CON.DE | €76.04 | -0.52% | 15.2B | 13.02 | €5.84 | +3.29% |
| KBX.DE | €88.80 | -1.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | €2.65 | +1.97% |
| HLE.DE | €87.00 | -1.02% | 9.7B | 31.07 | €2.80 | +1.09% |
| SHA0.DE | €4.18 | -0.24% | 3.9B | -3.73 | -€1.12 | +5.99% |
| SHA.DE | €4.63 | +0.78% | 3.1B | 10.30 | €0.45 | N/A |
| GTR.DE | €7.97 | +0.18% | 2.3B | -4.92 | -€1.62 | N/A |
| VTSC.DE | €52.90 | -0.09% | 2.1B | 85.32 | €0.62 | N/A |
| SFQ.DE | €16.40 | -0.61% | 744.5M | 11.63 | €1.41 | +10.37% |
| ZIL2.DE | €4.37 | -3.00% | 276.6M | -1.87 | -€2.33 | +3.44% |
Stock Comparison
BDT.DE vs CON.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, CON.DE has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while CON.DE trades at €76.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas CON.DE's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CON.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to CON.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs KBX.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, KBX.DE has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while KBX.DE trades at €88.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas KBX.DE's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KBX.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to KBX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs HLE.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, HLE.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while HLE.DE trades at €87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas HLE.DE's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HLE.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to HLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs SHA0.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, SHA0.DE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while SHA0.DE trades at €4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas SHA0.DE's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SHA0.DE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to SHA0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs SHA.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, SHA.DE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while SHA.DE trades at €4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas SHA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SHA.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to SHA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs GTR.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, GTR.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while GTR.DE trades at €7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas GTR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GTR.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to GTR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs VTSC.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, VTSC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while VTSC.DE trades at €52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas VTSC.DE's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VTSC.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to VTSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs SFQ.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, SFQ.DE has a market cap of 744.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while SFQ.DE trades at €16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas SFQ.DE's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SFQ.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to SFQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs ZIL2.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, ZIL2.DE has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while ZIL2.DE trades at €4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas ZIL2.DE's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ZIL2.DE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to ZIL2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs NVM.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, NVM.DE has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while NVM.DE trades at €4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas NVM.DE's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVM.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to NVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs PSQ.F Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, PSQ.F has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while PSQ.F trades at €0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas PSQ.F's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PSQ.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to PSQ.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs ED4.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, ED4.DE has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while ED4.DE trades at €5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas ED4.DE's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ED4.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to ED4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs GMM.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, GMM.DE has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while GMM.DE trades at €7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas GMM.DE's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GMM.DE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to GMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs PWO.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, PWO.DE has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while PWO.DE trades at €29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas PWO.DE's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PWO.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to PWO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs P4N.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, P4N.DE has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while P4N.DE trades at €3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas P4N.DE's P/E ratio is -18.94. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to P4N.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to P4N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs VBX.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, VBX.DE has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while VBX.DE trades at €2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas VBX.DE's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VBX.DE's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to VBX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs VBX.F Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, VBX.F has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while VBX.F trades at €2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas VBX.F's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VBX.F's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to VBX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs MSAG.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, MSAG.DE has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while MSAG.DE trades at €1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas MSAG.DE's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MSAG.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to MSAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs DEX.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, DEX.DE has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while DEX.DE trades at €2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas DEX.DE's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DEX.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to DEX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs H9W.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, H9W.DE has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while H9W.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas H9W.DE's P/E ratio is -22.77. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to H9W.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to H9W.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs SF3.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, SF3.DE has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while SF3.DE trades at €3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas SF3.DE's P/E ratio is -30.60. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SF3.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to SF3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs C0M.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, C0M.DE has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while C0M.DE trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas C0M.DE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to C0M.DE's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to C0M.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs HGEA.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, HGEA.DE has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while HGEA.DE trades at €1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas HGEA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HGEA.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to HGEA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs PGN.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, PGN.DE has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while PGN.DE trades at €2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas PGN.DE's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PGN.DE's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to PGN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs IS7.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, IS7.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while IS7.DE trades at €2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas IS7.DE's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IS7.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to IS7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs SD1.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, SD1.DE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while SD1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas SD1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SD1.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to SD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs TINC.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, TINC.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while TINC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas TINC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TINC.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to TINC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs DAI.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, DAI.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while DAI.DE trades at €70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas DAI.DE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DAI.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is less volatile compared to DAI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.
BDT.DE vs OSR.DE Comparison
BDT.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDT.DE stands at 222.8M. In comparison, OSR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDT.DE is priced at €22.05, while OSR.DE trades at €52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas OSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDT.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OSR.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BDT.DE is more volatile compared to OSR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDT.DE.