Bacanora Lithium Plc
Bacanora Lithium Plc BCN.L Peers
See (BCN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
BCN.L vs BHP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 92.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BHP.L trades at $1,827.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 88.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0L5V.L trades at $352.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 51.12. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 81.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R2J.L trades at $160.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 68.74. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs RIO.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 76.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while RIO.L trades at $4,496.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 71.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0IFA.L trades at $252.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 65.85. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 71.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0L8B.L trades at $88.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 60.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0HBH.L trades at $271.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0Z4C.L trades at $231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 30.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while GLEN.L trades at $252.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -25.23. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 26.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0NHS.L trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 26.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0K9L.L trades at $114.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0KEI.L trades at $109.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs AAL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 24.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while AAL.L trades at $2,048.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 18.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0EDD.L trades at $57.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 15.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UGS.L trades at $37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -88.85. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R07.L trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 13.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0HQU.L trades at $79.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 12.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0KXS.L trades at $182.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0LVK.L trades at $80.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0K3B.L trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 9.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0LJ9.L trades at $41.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0IF3.L trades at $77.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0U6C.L trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0HC7.L trades at $58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0HCB.L trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs S32.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while S32.L trades at $134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QYN.L trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0HUR.L trades at $51.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R0U.L trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -71.78. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VBE.L trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -157.09. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0IK3.L trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0AHJ.L trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VL5.L trades at $44.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VGM.L trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0I0H.L trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R0A.L trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 170.17. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0L45.L trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VGE.L trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0TWH.L trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BCN.L has daily volatility of 0.15 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
BCN.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VOA.L trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QYM.L trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VHI.L trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0KW8.L trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0HWG.L trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0NZN.L trades at $808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R2C.L trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 48.24. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R11.L trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QZ2.L trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 675.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0G5B.L trades at $118.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 670.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ADT1.L trades at $194.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 520.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0O6D.L trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 449.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0KD1.L trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -37.92. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 397.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0JZT.L trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 385.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VIK.L trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KMR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 363.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KMR.L trades at $411.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs GFM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 324.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while GFM.L trades at $176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 221.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UYN.L trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 214.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SOLG.L trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SVML.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 197.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SVML.L trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 188.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R20.L trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 170.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0P07.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BSE.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BSE.L trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 147.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0RRC.L trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KP2.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 145.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KP2.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs TRR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while TRR.L trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 139.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CAPD.L trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 138.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ECOR.L trades at $55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -18.53. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 136.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0V46.L trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 129.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VNO.L trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs PRE.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 101.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while PRE.L trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs JLP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 101.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while JLP.L trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SAV.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 97.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SAV.L trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 97.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CUSN.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs RBW.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 74.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while RBW.L trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UIK.L trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 70.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0IYS.L trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KOD.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 69.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KOD.L trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0R0D.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 64.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QQR.L trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 61.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QVG.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs MKA.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 55.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while MKA.L trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs HE1.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 53.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while HE1.L trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while AFRK.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ATM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 50.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ATM.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ALL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 49.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ALL.L trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0ICI.L trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UYO.L trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 36.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QPH.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs FAR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 32.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while FAR.L trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs FOX.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 30.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while FOX.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs NMT.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while NMT.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 28.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ZNWD.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ARS.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 27.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ARS.L trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 25.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 1SN.L trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs EMH.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while EMH.L trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KAV.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 22.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KAV.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ARCM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARCM.L has a market cap of 21.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ARCM.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ARCM.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARCM.L's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ARCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs GSP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while GSP.L trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0V7X.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0V7X.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs RMR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 16.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while RMR.L trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs MTR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MTR.L has a market cap of 15.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while MTR.L trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas MTR.L's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTR.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to MTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs PREM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PREM.L has a market cap of 15.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while PREM.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas PREM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PREM.L's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to PREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UVX.L trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs POW.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, POW.L has a market cap of 13.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while POW.L trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas POW.L's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POW.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to POW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs MET1.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 13.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while MET1.L trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs LND.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LND.L has a market cap of 13.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while LND.L trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas LND.L's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LND.L's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to LND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs VAST.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, VAST.L has a market cap of 13.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while VAST.L trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas VAST.L's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAST.L's ROE of +9.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to VAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CRCL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CRCL.L trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 80M.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 80M.L has a market cap of 11.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 80M.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 80M.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 80M.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to 80M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UXL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UXL.L has a market cap of 10.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UXL.L trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UXL.L's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UXL.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UXL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0URM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0URM.L has a market cap of 10.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0URM.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0URM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0URM.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0URM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UX6.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UX6.L has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UX6.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UX6.L's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UX6.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CLA.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CLA.L has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CLA.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to CLA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BRES.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BRES.L has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BRES.L trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BRES.L's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRES.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to BRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CMET.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CMET.L has a market cap of 9.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CMET.L trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CMET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMET.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs GLR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GLR.L has a market cap of 9.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while GLR.L trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas GLR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to GLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs PXC.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PXC.L has a market cap of 9.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while PXC.L trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas PXC.L's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PXC.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to PXC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs RMM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RMM.L has a market cap of 8.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while RMM.L trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas RMM.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMM.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to RMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs TGR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TGR.L has a market cap of 8.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while TGR.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas TGR.L's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGR.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to TGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ARV.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARV.L has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ARV.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ARV.L's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARV.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ARV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UY6.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UY6.L has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UY6.L trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UY6.L's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UY6.L's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UY6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0QQJ.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QQJ.L has a market cap of 7.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0QQJ.L trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0QQJ.L's P/E ratio is -22.77. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QQJ.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QQJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CTL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CTL.L has a market cap of 7.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CTL.L trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CTL.L's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTL.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0V4O.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V4O.L has a market cap of 7.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0V4O.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0V4O.L's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0V4O.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0V4O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs FRG.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FRG.L has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while FRG.L trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas FRG.L's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRG.L's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to FRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BMN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BMN.L has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BMN.L trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BMN.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMN.L's ROE of -259.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to BMN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SML.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SML.L has a market cap of 7.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SML.L trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SML.L's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs GROC.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GROC.L has a market cap of 6.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while GROC.L trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas GROC.L's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to GROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs MNRG.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MNRG.L has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while MNRG.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas MNRG.L's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNRG.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to MNRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs TUN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TUN.L has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while TUN.L trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas TUN.L's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TUN.L's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to TUN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0RH8.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RH8.L has a market cap of 6.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0RH8.L trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0RH8.L's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0RH8.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0RH8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs PYX.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PYX.L has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while PYX.L trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas PYX.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PYX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to PYX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs IRON.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IRON.L has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while IRON.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas IRON.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRON.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to IRON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KDNC.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KDNC.L has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KDNC.L trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KDNC.L's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDNC.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KDNC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ATN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ATN.L has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ATN.L trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ATN.L's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATN.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ATN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BMV.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BMV.L has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BMV.L trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to BMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0P3V.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0P3V.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0P3V.L trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0P3V.L's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0P3V.L's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0P3V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs JAY.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JAY.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while JAY.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas JAY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAY.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to JAY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BEM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BEM.L has a market cap of 4.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BEM.L trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BEM.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEM.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to BEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs THR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, THR.L has a market cap of 4.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while THR.L trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas THR.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THR.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to THR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BZT.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BZT.L has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BZT.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BZT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to BZT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs AYM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AYM.L has a market cap of 4.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while AYM.L trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas AYM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AYM.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to AYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs IMC.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IMC.L has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while IMC.L trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas IMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to IMC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs BHL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BHL.L has a market cap of 4.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while BHL.L trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas BHL.L's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHL.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to BHL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0T9J.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0T9J.L has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0T9J.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0T9J.L's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0T9J.L's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0T9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs WRES.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, WRES.L has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while WRES.L trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas WRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRES.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to WRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ORM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ORM.L has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ORM.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ORM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORM.L's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to ORM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UFP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UFP.L has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UFP.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UFP.L's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UFP.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ALBA.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ALBA.L has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ALBA.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ALBA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALBA.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ALBA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs PFP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PFP.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while PFP.L trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas PFP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFP.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to PFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs FCM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FCM.L has a market cap of 2.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while FCM.L trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas FCM.L's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to FCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs REE.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, REE.L has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while REE.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas REE.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to REE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0IYU.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IYU.L has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0IYU.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0IYU.L's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IYU.L's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0IYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs RRR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RRR.L has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while RRR.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas RRR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRR.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to RRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs URU.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, URU.L has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while URU.L trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas URU.L's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to URU.L's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to URU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs UMR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, UMR.L has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while UMR.L trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas UMR.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to UMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SKA.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SKA.L has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SKA.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SKA.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKA.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs EUZ.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EUZ.L has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while EUZ.L trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas EUZ.L's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUZ.L's ROE of -193.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to EUZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs AFP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AFP.L has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while AFP.L trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas AFP.L's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFP.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to AFP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs TYM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TYM.L has a market cap of 1.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while TYM.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas TYM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TYM.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to TYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs TM1.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TM1.L has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while TM1.L trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas TM1.L's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TM1.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to TM1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CDL.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CDL.L has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CDL.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDL.L's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs JAN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JAN.L has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while JAN.L trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas JAN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to JAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ARK.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ARK.L has a market cap of 1.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ARK.L trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ARK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARK.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to ARK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KRS.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KRS.L has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KRS.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRS.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs HZM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HZM.L has a market cap of 876782.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while HZM.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas HZM.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HZM.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to HZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs GWMO.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GWMO.L has a market cap of 848076.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while GWMO.L trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas GWMO.L's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GWMO.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to GWMO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SRES.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SRES.L has a market cap of 816118.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SRES.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRES.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CHF.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CHF.L has a market cap of 781968.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CHF.L trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CHF.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHF.L's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CHF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs CRTM.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CRTM.L has a market cap of 657050.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while CRTM.L trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas CRTM.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRTM.L's ROE of +28.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to CRTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs ACP.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ACP.L has a market cap of 560115.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while ACP.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas ACP.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to ACP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs KEN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KEN.L has a market cap of 527847.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while KEN.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas KEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEN.L's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to KEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs AMC.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AMC.L has a market cap of 8688.00. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while AMC.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas AMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMC.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to AMC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0VDK.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0VDK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0VDK.L trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0VDK.L's P/E ratio is -36.04. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VDK.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0VDK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs SO4.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SO4.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while SO4.L trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas SO4.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SO4.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to SO4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs NSH.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NSH.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while NSH.L trades at $175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas NSH.L's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSH.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to NSH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0UR5.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UR5.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0UR5.L trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0UR5.L's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UR5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0UR5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0MFI.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0MFI.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0MFI.L trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0MFI.L's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0MFI.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0MFI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs IRR.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, IRR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while IRR.L trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas IRR.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRR.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to IRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0K69.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K69.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0K69.L trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0K69.L's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0K69.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0K69.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs MNOD.IL Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MNOD.IL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while MNOD.IL trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas MNOD.IL's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNOD.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is less volatile compared to MNOD.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0V38.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V38.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0V38.L trades at $49.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0V38.L's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0V38.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0V38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
BCN.L vs 0FSN.L Comparison
BCN.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCN.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0FSN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BCN.L is priced at $67.00, while 0FSN.L trades at $141.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.09, whereas 0FSN.L's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, BCN.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0FSN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCN.L is more volatile compared to 0FSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCN.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP.L | $1,827.00 | +1.00% | 92.72B | 10.88 | $1.68 | +5.06% |
| 0L5V.L | $352.04 | -1.39% | 88.22B | 51.12 | $6.89 | +0.84% |
| 0R2J.L | $160.98 | +2.67% | 81.38B | 68.74 | $2.34 | +0.86% |
| RIO.L | $4,496.50 | +1.16% | 76.50B | 8.48 | $5.30 | +6.90% |
| 0IFA.L | $252.93 | -1.19% | 71.74B | 65.85 | $3.84 | +0.97% |
| 0L8B.L | $88.61 | -0.04% | 71.25B | 20.05 | $4.42 | +3.00% |
| 0HBH.L | $271.56 | +0.25% | 60.43B | 27.05 | $10.04 | +2.62% |
| 0Z4C.L | $231.20 | -2.78% | 32.77B | 35.01 | $6.60 | +1.74% |
| GLEN.L | $252.30 | -0.20% | 30.32B | -25.23 | -$0.10 | +2.31% |
| 0NHS.L | $55.04 | +0.80% | 26.89B | 7.08 | $7.77 | +3.91% |