Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF BCHS.L Peers
See (BCHS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCHS.L | £8,454.00 | -2.23% | 43.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IH2O.L | £5,324.50 | +0.50% | 167.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.18% |
| INRG.L | £538.50 | +0.33% | 146.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.38% |
| PRIW.L | £3,008.63 | +1.36% | 116.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JMRE.L | £2,455.75 | -1.18% | 105.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XGSD.L | £2,480.50 | +0.36% | 54.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.18% |
| ROBG.L | £1,672.25 | -1.41% | 43.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LGGG.L | £1,583.90 | -0.23% | 28B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSGI.L | £5,114.00 | +0.60% | 24.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GGRG.L | £3,068.00 | +0.11% | 23.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCHS.L vs IH2O.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, IH2O.L has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while IH2O.L trades at £5,324.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IH2O.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to IH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs INRG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, INRG.L has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while INRG.L trades at £538.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to INRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PRIW.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PRIW.L has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PRIW.L trades at £3,008.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PRIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JMRE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JMRE.L has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JMRE.L trades at £2,455.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JMRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs XGSD.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, XGSD.L has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while XGSD.L trades at £2,480.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to XGSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs ROBG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, ROBG.L has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while ROBG.L trades at £1,672.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to ROBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs LGGG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, LGGG.L has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while LGGG.L trades at £1,583.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to LGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs XSGI.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, XSGI.L has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while XSGI.L trades at £5,114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSGI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to XSGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GGRG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GGRG.L has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GGRG.L trades at £3,068.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GGRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PRIG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PRIG.L has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PRIG.L trades at £1,432.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PRIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JREG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JREG.L has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JREG.L trades at £52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.L's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JREG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs CECL.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, CECL.L has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while CECL.L trades at £1,648.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CECL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to CECL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JGRE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JGRE.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JGRE.L trades at £3,882.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JGRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs SBUY.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SBUY.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while SBUY.L trades at £4,388.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBUY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBUY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to SBUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs FCSG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FCSG.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while FCSG.L trades at £3,218.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to FCSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GLAB.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GLAB.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GLAB.L trades at £28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GLAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs RBE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, RBE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while RBE.L trades at £63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to RBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GGOV.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GGOV.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GGOV.L trades at £3,863.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGOV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GGOV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs DH2O.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, DH2O.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while DH2O.L trades at £71.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DH2O.L's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to DH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GAGU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GAGU.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GAGU.L trades at £55.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GAGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs HVPE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, HVPE.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while HVPE.L trades at £2,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVPE.L's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HVPE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to HVPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GGRP.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GGRP.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GGRP.L trades at £2,617.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GGRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GGRA.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GGRA.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GGRA.L trades at £41.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRA.L's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GGRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs IDIN.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, IDIN.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while IDIN.L trades at £34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDIN.L's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDIN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to IDIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs IGSU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, IGSU.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while IGSU.L trades at £78.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSU.L's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to IGSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PRWU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PRWU.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PRWU.L trades at £33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRWU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRWU.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PRWU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs MAGI.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, MAGI.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while MAGI.L trades at £35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGI.L's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAGI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to MAGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JREM.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JREM.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JREM.L trades at £33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.L's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JREM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GLDV.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GLDV.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GLDV.L trades at £34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GLDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs IQSA.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, IQSA.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while IQSA.L trades at £82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.L's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to IQSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JPCT.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JPCT.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JPCT.L trades at £43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPCT.L's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPCT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JPCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs V3AA.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, V3AA.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while V3AA.L trades at £6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AA.L's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to V3AA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs V3AL.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, V3AL.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while V3AL.L trades at £6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.L's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to V3AL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs V3AB.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, V3AB.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while V3AB.L trades at £4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to V3AB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs BBGI.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, BBGI.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while BBGI.L trades at £143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGI.L's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBGI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to BBGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs AGT.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, AGT.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while AGT.L trades at £236.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGT.L's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to AGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GBDV.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GBDV.L has a market cap of 904.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GBDV.L trades at £25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBDV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GBDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GSCT.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GSCT.L has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GSCT.L trades at £156.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSCT.L's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSCT.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GSCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs EPRA.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, EPRA.L has a market cap of 693M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while EPRA.L trades at £5,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to EPRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs XGDD.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, XGDD.L has a market cap of 645.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while XGDD.L trades at £33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGDD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to XGDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PCFT.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PCFT.L has a market cap of 626.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PCFT.L trades at £206.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCFT.L's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCFT.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PCFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GDIG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GDIG.L has a market cap of 608.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GDIG.L trades at £34.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDIG.L's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs ROBO.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, ROBO.L has a market cap of 587.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while ROBO.L trades at £22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBO.L's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to ROBO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs BCHN.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, BCHN.L has a market cap of 568.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while BCHN.L trades at £113.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHN.L's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to BCHN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs APAX.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, APAX.L has a market cap of 553.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while APAX.L trades at £114.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APAX.L's P/E ratio is 114.20. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to APAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs QYLU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, QYLU.L has a market cap of 505.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while QYLU.L trades at £20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to QYLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs QYLD.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, QYLD.L has a market cap of 497.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while QYLD.L trades at £15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLD.L's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to QYLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs LUXU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, LUXU.L has a market cap of 485M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while LUXU.L trades at £224.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to LUXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PAVE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PAVE.L has a market cap of 467.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PAVE.L trades at £38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVE.L's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PAVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PCGH.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PCGH.L has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PCGH.L trades at £321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGH.L's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCGH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PCGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs LGGL.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, LGGL.L has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while LGGL.L trades at £21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGL.L's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to LGGL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs SDIU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SDIU.L has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while SDIU.L trades at £12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIU.L's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to SDIU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs SDIP.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SDIP.L has a market cap of 370.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while SDIP.L trades at £6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to SDIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs QYLP.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, QYLP.L has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while QYLP.L trades at £11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to QYLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs SKYU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SKYU.L has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while SKYU.L trades at £48.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYU.L's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to SKYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PAVG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PAVG.L has a market cap of 351.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PAVG.L trades at £28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to PAVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs INFR.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, INFR.L has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while INFR.L trades at £2,537.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to INFR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GLRE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GLRE.L has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GLRE.L trades at £34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRE.L's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GLRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs TRET.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, TRET.L has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while TRET.L trades at £42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to TRET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GLRA.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GLRA.L has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GLRA.L trades at £19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRA.L's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GLRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GSEO.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GSEO.L has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GSEO.L trades at £63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to GSEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GBRE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GBRE.L has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GBRE.L trades at £25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GBRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GENE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GENE.L has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GENE.L trades at £1,629.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GENE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs EGL.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, EGL.L has a market cap of 224.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while EGL.L trades at £212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGL.L's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGL.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to EGL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JPLG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JPLG.L has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JPLG.L trades at £3,081.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPLG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPLG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JPLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JARU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JARU.L has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JARU.L trades at £1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARU.L's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JARU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JARU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs URNU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, URNU.L has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while URNU.L trades at £18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URNU.L's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URNU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to URNU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs MNP.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, MNP.L has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while MNP.L trades at £315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNP.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to MNP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs COPX.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, COPX.L has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while COPX.L trades at £30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPX.L's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to COPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs URND.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, URND.L has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while URND.L trades at £13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to URND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs FLXX.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FLXX.L has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while FLXX.L trades at £27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to FLXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GOGB.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GOGB.L has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GOGB.L trades at £24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GOGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs FGLR.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FGLR.L has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while FGLR.L trades at £9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLR.L's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGLR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to FGLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs FGLS.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FGLS.L has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while FGLS.L trades at £7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGLS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to FGLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs CESG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, CESG.L has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while CESG.L trades at £43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESG.L's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to CESG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs 0P00018XAR.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 0P00018XAR.L has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while 0P00018XAR.L trades at £218.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAR.L's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00018XAR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs 0P00018XAO.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 0P00018XAO.L has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while 0P00018XAO.L trades at £191.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAO.L's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00018XAO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs BUG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, BUG.L has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while BUG.L trades at £15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUG.L's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to BUG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GEND.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GEND.L has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GEND.L trades at £12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GEND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GEDV.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GEDV.L has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GEDV.L trades at £20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GEDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs FLXG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FLXG.L has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while FLXG.L trades at £29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to FLXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs FRGE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FRGE.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while FRGE.L trades at £39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGE.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to FRGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GCED.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GCED.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GCED.L trades at £15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCED.L's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GCED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs PMGR.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PMGR.L has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while PMGR.L trades at £98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMGR.L's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to PMGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs SKYP.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SKYP.L has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while SKYP.L trades at £915.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKYP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to SKYP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs KZG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, KZG.L has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while KZG.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KZG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KZG.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to KZG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs AMAL.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, AMAL.L has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while AMAL.L trades at £9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAL.L's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to AMAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs METR.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, METR.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while METR.L trades at £10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METR.L's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to METR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to METR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs 0P000185T5.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 0P000185T5.L has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while 0P000185T5.L trades at £194.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs 0P000185T6.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 0P000185T6.L has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while 0P000185T6.L trades at £165.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs HBKU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, HBKU.L has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while HBKU.L trades at £11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBKU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBKU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to HBKU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GNOM.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GNOM.L has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GNOM.L trades at £5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to GNOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs DRVE.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, DRVE.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while DRVE.L trades at £11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVE.L's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to DRVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs GNOG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GNOG.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while GNOG.L trades at £4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is less volatile compared to GNOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs HERU.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, HERU.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while HERU.L trades at £13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERU.L's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERU.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to HERU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs DRVG.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, DRVG.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while DRVG.L trades at £7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to DRVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs JETS.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, JETS.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while JETS.L trades at £6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JETS.L's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to JETS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs 0P000185T3.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 0P000185T3.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while 0P000185T3.L trades at £262.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T3.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.
BCHS.L vs 0P000185T4.L Comparison
BCHS.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHS.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 0P000185T4.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHS.L is priced at £8,454.00, while 0P000185T4.L trades at £240.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T4.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHS.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T4.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHS.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHS.L.