Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF BCHN.L Peers
See (BCHN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCHN.L | $111.83 | +1.98% | 613.02M | 19.94 | $5.61 | N/A |
| IH2O.L | $5,284.50 | -0.62% | 167.99B | N/A | N/A | +1.03% |
| INRG.L | $557.50 | +0.13% | 153.53B | N/A | N/A | +1.18% |
| PRIW.L | $3,008.63 | +1.36% | 116.76B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JMRE.L | $2,542.25 | +0.86% | 108.87B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XGSD.L | $2,514.50 | -0.08% | 55.69B | N/A | N/A | +5.44% |
| BCHS.L | $8,419.00 | +2.33% | 46.15B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ROBG.L | $1,705.25 | -0.20% | 45.48B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LGGG.L | $1,589.50 | -0.28% | 29.16B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSGI.L | $5,019.00 | -0.72% | 24.60B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCHN.L vs IH2O.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, IH2O.L has a market cap of 167.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while IH2O.L trades at $5,284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas IH2O.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to IH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs INRG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, INRG.L has a market cap of 153.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while INRG.L trades at $557.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas INRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INRG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to INRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PRIW.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PRIW.L has a market cap of 116.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PRIW.L trades at $3,008.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PRIW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JMRE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JMRE.L has a market cap of 108.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JMRE.L trades at $2,542.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JMRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JMRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs XGSD.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, XGSD.L has a market cap of 55.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while XGSD.L trades at $2,514.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas XGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to XGSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs BCHS.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, BCHS.L has a market cap of 46.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while BCHS.L trades at $8,419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas BCHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to BCHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs ROBG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, ROBG.L has a market cap of 45.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while ROBG.L trades at $1,705.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ROBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to ROBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs LGGG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, LGGG.L has a market cap of 29.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while LGGG.L trades at $1,589.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to LGGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs XSGI.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, XSGI.L has a market cap of 24.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while XSGI.L trades at $5,019.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas XSGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSGI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to XSGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GGRG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GGRG.L has a market cap of 23.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GGRG.L trades at $3,067.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GGRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GGRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PRIG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PRIG.L has a market cap of 11.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PRIG.L trades at $1,429.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PRIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PRIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs CECL.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, CECL.L has a market cap of 8.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while CECL.L trades at $1,648.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CECL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CECL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to CECL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs SBUY.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, SBUY.L has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while SBUY.L trades at $4,460.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SBUY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBUY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to SBUY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JREG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JREG.L has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JREG.L trades at $52.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JREG.L's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JREG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs FCSG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, FCSG.L has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while FCSG.L trades at $3,153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FCSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to FCSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GLAB.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GLAB.L has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GLAB.L trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GLAB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GLAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JGRE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JGRE.L has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JGRE.L trades at $3,916.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JGRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JGRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs RBE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, RBE.L has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while RBE.L trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas RBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to RBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GAGU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GAGU.L has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GAGU.L trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GAGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GAGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs DH2O.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, DH2O.L has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while DH2O.L trades at $70.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas DH2O.L's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to DH2O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs HVPE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, HVPE.L has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while HVPE.L trades at $2,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HVPE.L's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HVPE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to HVPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs IDIN.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, IDIN.L has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while IDIN.L trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas IDIN.L's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDIN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to IDIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs IGSU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, IGSU.L has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while IGSU.L trades at $77.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas IGSU.L's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to IGSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PRWU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PRWU.L has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PRWU.L trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PRWU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRWU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PRWU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs MAGI.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, MAGI.L has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while MAGI.L trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MAGI.L's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAGI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to MAGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JREM.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JREM.L has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JREM.L trades at $33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JREM.L's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JREM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GLDV.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GLDV.L has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GLDV.L trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GLDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GLDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs V3AL.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, V3AL.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while V3AL.L trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas V3AL.L's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to V3AL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs V3AA.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, V3AA.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while V3AA.L trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas V3AA.L's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to V3AA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs V3AB.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, V3AB.L has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while V3AB.L trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas V3AB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3AB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to V3AB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs BBGI.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, BBGI.L has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while BBGI.L trades at $142.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas BBGI.L's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBGI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to BBGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs AGT.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, AGT.L has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while AGT.L trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AGT.L's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to AGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JPCT.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JPCT.L has a market cap of 967.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JPCT.L trades at $43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JPCT.L's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPCT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JPCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GBDV.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GBDV.L has a market cap of 911.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GBDV.L trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GBDV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GBDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs IQSA.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, IQSA.L has a market cap of 883.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while IQSA.L trades at $81.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas IQSA.L's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to IQSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GGRA.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GGRA.L has a market cap of 754.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GGRA.L trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GGRA.L's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GGRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GSCT.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GSCT.L has a market cap of 702.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GSCT.L trades at $157.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GSCT.L's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSCT.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GSCT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs XGDD.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, XGDD.L has a market cap of 644.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while XGDD.L trades at $33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas XGDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGDD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to XGDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PCFT.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PCFT.L has a market cap of 626.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PCFT.L trades at $206.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PCFT.L's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCFT.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PCFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs ROBO.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, ROBO.L has a market cap of 624.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while ROBO.L trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ROBO.L's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to ROBO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GDIG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GDIG.L has a market cap of 600.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GDIG.L trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GDIG.L's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GDIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs APAX.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, APAX.L has a market cap of 585.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while APAX.L trades at $120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas APAX.L's P/E ratio is 120.80. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to APAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PAVE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PAVE.L has a market cap of 503.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PAVE.L trades at $38.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PAVE.L's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PAVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs QYLU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, QYLU.L has a market cap of 502.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while QYLU.L trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas QYLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to QYLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs LUXU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, LUXU.L has a market cap of 500.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while LUXU.L trades at $228.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LUXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to LUXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs QYLD.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, QYLD.L has a market cap of 499.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while QYLD.L trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas QYLD.L's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to QYLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PCGH.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PCGH.L has a market cap of 382.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PCGH.L trades at $315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PCGH.L's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCGH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PCGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs LGGL.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, LGGL.L has a market cap of 379.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while LGGL.L trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LGGL.L's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to LGGL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs QYLP.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, QYLP.L has a market cap of 377.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while QYLP.L trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas QYLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to QYLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs SDIU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, SDIU.L has a market cap of 376.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while SDIU.L trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SDIU.L's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to SDIU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs SDIP.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, SDIP.L has a market cap of 371.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while SDIP.L trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SDIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to SDIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs SKYU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, SKYU.L has a market cap of 362.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while SKYU.L trades at $40.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SKYU.L's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to SKYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PAVG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PAVG.L has a market cap of 359.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PAVG.L trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PAVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PAVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs INFR.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, INFR.L has a market cap of 338.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while INFR.L trades at $2,526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas INFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to INFR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GLRA.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GLRA.L has a market cap of 302.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GLRA.L trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GLRA.L's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GLRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GLRE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GLRE.L has a market cap of 300.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GLRE.L trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GLRE.L's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GLRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs TRET.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, TRET.L has a market cap of 294.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while TRET.L trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas TRET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to TRET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GGOV.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GGOV.L has a market cap of 270.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GGOV.L trades at $3,861.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGOV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GGOV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GSEO.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GSEO.L has a market cap of 250.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GSEO.L trades at $63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GSEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is less volatile compared to GSEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GGRP.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GGRP.L has a market cap of 249.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GGRP.L trades at $2,614.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GGRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GGRP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GENE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GENE.L has a market cap of 233.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GENE.L trades at $1,612.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GENE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GENE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GBRE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GBRE.L has a market cap of 225.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GBRE.L trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GBRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GBRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs EGL.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, EGL.L has a market cap of 219.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while EGL.L trades at $206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas EGL.L's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGL.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to EGL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs EPRA.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, EPRA.L has a market cap of 207.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while EPRA.L trades at $5,247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas EPRA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to EPRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs URNU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, URNU.L has a market cap of 201.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while URNU.L trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas URNU.L's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URNU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to URNU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JPLG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JPLG.L has a market cap of 190.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JPLG.L trades at $3,069.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JPLG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPLG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JPLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs MNP.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, MNP.L has a market cap of 184.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while MNP.L trades at $315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MNP.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNP.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to MNP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JARU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JARU.L has a market cap of 183.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JARU.L trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JARU.L's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JARU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JARU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs COPX.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, COPX.L has a market cap of 157.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while COPX.L trades at $30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas COPX.L's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to COPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs URND.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, URND.L has a market cap of 151.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while URND.L trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas URND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to URND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs FLXX.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, FLXX.L has a market cap of 107.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while FLXX.L trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FLXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to FLXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GOGB.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GOGB.L has a market cap of 96.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GOGB.L trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GOGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GOGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs FGLR.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, FGLR.L has a market cap of 86.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while FGLR.L trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FGLR.L's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGLR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to FGLR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs FGLS.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, FGLS.L has a market cap of 83.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while FGLS.L trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FGLS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGLS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to FGLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs CESG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, CESG.L has a market cap of 57.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while CESG.L trades at $41.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CESG.L's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to CESG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs 0P00018XAO.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, 0P00018XAO.L has a market cap of 50.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while 0P00018XAO.L trades at $194.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas 0P00018XAO.L's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00018XAO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs 0P00018XAR.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, 0P00018XAR.L has a market cap of 50.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while 0P00018XAR.L trades at $223.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas 0P00018XAR.L's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00018XAR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to 0P00018XAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs BUG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, BUG.L has a market cap of 45.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while BUG.L trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas BUG.L's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to BUG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GEND.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GEND.L has a market cap of 41.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GEND.L trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GEND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GEND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GEDV.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GEDV.L has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GEDV.L trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GEDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GEDV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GCED.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GCED.L has a market cap of 20.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GCED.L trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GCED.L's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GCED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs FLXG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, FLXG.L has a market cap of 20.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while FLXG.L trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FLXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to FLXG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs FRGE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, FRGE.L has a market cap of 20.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while FRGE.L trades at $39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FRGE.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to FRGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs KZG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, KZG.L has a market cap of 19.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while KZG.L trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KZG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KZG.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is less volatile compared to KZG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs PMGR.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, PMGR.L has a market cap of 18.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while PMGR.L trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PMGR.L's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to PMGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs SKYP.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, SKYP.L has a market cap of 16.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while SKYP.L trades at $915.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SKYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKYP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to SKYP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs AMAL.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, AMAL.L has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while AMAL.L trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AMAL.L's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to AMAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs METR.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, METR.L has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while METR.L trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas METR.L's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to METR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to METR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs 0P000185T5.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, 0P000185T5.L has a market cap of 9.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while 0P000185T5.L trades at $197.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas 0P000185T5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs 0P000185T6.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, 0P000185T6.L has a market cap of 9.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while 0P000185T6.L trades at $168.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas 0P000185T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs HBKU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, HBKU.L has a market cap of 9.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while HBKU.L trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HBKU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBKU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to HBKU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GNOM.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GNOM.L has a market cap of 7.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GNOM.L trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GNOM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GNOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs DRVE.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, DRVE.L has a market cap of 6.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while DRVE.L trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas DRVE.L's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to DRVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs GNOG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, GNOG.L has a market cap of 5.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while GNOG.L trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GNOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to GNOG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs HERU.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, HERU.L has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while HERU.L trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HERU.L's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HERU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to HERU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs DRVG.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, DRVG.L has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while DRVG.L trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas DRVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to DRVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs 0P000185T4.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, 0P000185T4.L has a market cap of 4.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while 0P000185T4.L trades at $247.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas 0P000185T4.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T4.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs 0P000185T3.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, 0P000185T3.L has a market cap of 4.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while 0P000185T3.L trades at $269.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas 0P000185T3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000185T3.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to 0P000185T3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.
BCHN.L vs JETS.L Comparison
BCHN.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHN.L stands at 613.02M. In comparison, JETS.L has a market cap of 4.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHN.L is priced at $111.83, while JETS.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas JETS.L's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, BCHN.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JETS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHN.L is more volatile compared to JETS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHN.L.