Baltic Classifieds Group PLC
Baltic Classifieds Group PLC BCG.L Peers
See (BCG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG.L | £371.50 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 46.81 | £0.08 | +0.73% |
| 0A28.L | £68.83 | -0.53% | 260B | 5.71 | £12.05 | +0.15% |
| AUTO.L | £822.80 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 25.85 | £0.32 | +1.20% |
| RMV.L | £778.20 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 32.90 | £0.24 | +1.45% |
| MONY.L | £220.00 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 14.57 | £0.15 | +5.72% |
| VKCO.IL | £4.10 | +6.58% | 972M | -12.06 | -£0.34 | N/A |
| BBSN.L | £63.80 | +0.00% | 840.2M | N/A | N/A | +0.03% |
| CNIC.L | £123.20 | +1.99% | 357.5M | -123.20 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| TIG.L | £65.20 | +0.00% | 160.3M | 11.12 | £0.06 | +1.14% |
| OTMP.L | £109.08 | +0.07% | 92.8M | -109.08 | -£0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCG.L vs 0A28.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0A28.L has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while 0A28.L trades at £68.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas 0A28.L's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0A28.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to 0A28.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs AUTO.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AUTO.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while AUTO.L trades at £822.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas AUTO.L's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUTO.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to AUTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs RMV.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RMV.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while RMV.L trades at £778.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas RMV.L's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMV.L's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to RMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs MONY.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MONY.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while MONY.L trades at £220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas MONY.L's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONY.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to MONY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs VKCO.IL Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VKCO.IL has a market cap of 972M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while VKCO.IL trades at £4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas VKCO.IL's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VKCO.IL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to VKCO.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs BBSN.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BBSN.L has a market cap of 840.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while BBSN.L trades at £63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas BBSN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBSN.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to BBSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs CNIC.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNIC.L has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while CNIC.L trades at £123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas CNIC.L's P/E ratio is -123.20. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNIC.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BCG.L has daily volatility of 1.48 and CNIC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
BCG.L vs TIG.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TIG.L has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while TIG.L trades at £65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas TIG.L's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to TIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs OTMP.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OTMP.L has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while OTMP.L trades at £109.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas OTMP.L's P/E ratio is -109.08. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTMP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to OTMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs NWOR.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NWOR.L has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while NWOR.L trades at £22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas NWOR.L's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWOR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to NWOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs MOS.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MOS.L has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while MOS.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas MOS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOS.L's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to MOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs BOOM.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BOOM.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while BOOM.L trades at £285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas BOOM.L's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOOM.L's ROE of -3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to BOOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs SMV.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SMV.L has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while SMV.L trades at £53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas SMV.L's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMV.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BCG.L has daily volatility of 1.48 and SMV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
BCG.L vs 7DIG.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 7DIG.L has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while 7DIG.L trades at £0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas 7DIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 7DIG.L's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to 7DIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs SEEN.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SEEN.L has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while SEEN.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas SEEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEEN.L's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to SEEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs DBOX.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DBOX.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while DBOX.L trades at £4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas DBOX.L's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBOX.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to DBOX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs SCGL.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SCGL.L has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while SCGL.L trades at £0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas SCGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCGL.L's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to SCGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs DISH.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DISH.L has a market cap of 525.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while DISH.L trades at £0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas DISH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DISH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to DISH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs 0XI7.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0XI7.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while 0XI7.L trades at £27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas 0XI7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0XI7.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BCG.L has daily volatility of 1.48 and 0XI7.L has daily volatility of N/A.
BCG.L vs IME.L Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IME.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while IME.L trades at £17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas IME.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IME.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is more volatile compared to IME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.
BCG.L vs MAIL.IL Comparison
BCG.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MAIL.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.L is priced at £371.50, while MAIL.IL trades at £12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 46.81, whereas MAIL.IL's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, BCG.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAIL.IL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.L is less volatile compared to MAIL.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.L.