BCE Inc.
BCE Inc. BCE-PY.TO Peers
See (BCE-PY.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCE-PY.TO | $16.60 | N/A | 15.30B | 5.12 | $3.24 | +12.65% |
| VZ.NE | $18.62 | -1.48% | 252.51B | 10.06 | $1.85 | +6.32% |
| T.TO | $22.33 | +0.22% | 33.81B | 33.33 | $0.67 | +7.11% |
| BCE.TO | $31.56 | -0.13% | 29.09B | 175.33 | $0.18 | +12.65% |
| SJR-B.TO | $40.48 | +0.02% | 20.23B | 27.54 | $1.47 | N/A |
| RCI-B.TO | $36.05 | +1.35% | 19.85B | 11.13 | $3.24 | +5.56% |
| RCI-A.TO | $39.60 | +0.51% | 19.59B | 12.22 | $3.24 | +5.05% |
| BCE-PA.TO | $17.33 | +0.23% | 15.98B | 5.35 | $3.24 | +12.65% |
| QBR-A.TO | $39.04 | -0.74% | 8.83B | 12.09 | $3.23 | +3.52% |
| QBR-B.TO | $37.57 | -1.85% | 8.74B | 11.63 | $3.23 | +3.52% |
Stock Comparison
BCE-PY.TO vs VZ.NE Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, VZ.NE has a market cap of 252.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while VZ.NE trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas VZ.NE's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VZ.NE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to VZ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs T.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, T.TO has a market cap of 33.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while T.TO trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas T.TO's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to T.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to T.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs BCE.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, BCE.TO has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while BCE.TO trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas BCE.TO's P/E ratio is 175.33. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to BCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs SJR-B.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, SJR-B.TO has a market cap of 20.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while SJR-B.TO trades at $40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas SJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SJR-B.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is more volatile compared to SJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs RCI-B.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, RCI-B.TO has a market cap of 19.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while RCI-B.TO trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas RCI-B.TO's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCI-B.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to RCI-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs RCI-A.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, RCI-A.TO has a market cap of 19.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while RCI-A.TO trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas RCI-A.TO's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCI-A.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is more volatile compared to RCI-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs BCE-PA.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, BCE-PA.TO has a market cap of 15.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while BCE-PA.TO trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas BCE-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCE-PA.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to BCE-PA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs QBR-A.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, QBR-A.TO has a market cap of 8.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while QBR-A.TO trades at $39.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas QBR-A.TO's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QBR-A.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to QBR-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs QBR-B.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, QBR-B.TO has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while QBR-B.TO trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas QBR-B.TO's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QBR-B.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to QBR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs CCA.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, CCA.TO has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while CCA.TO trades at $67.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas CCA.TO's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCA.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to CCA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs CGO.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, CGO.TO has a market cap of 627.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while CGO.TO trades at $64.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas CGO.TO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to CGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs TGO.TO Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, TGO.TO has a market cap of 24.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while TGO.TO trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas TGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TGO.TO's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is less volatile compared to TGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs TO.CN Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, TO.CN has a market cap of 7.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while TO.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas TO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is more volatile compared to TO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs RVR.CN Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, RVR.CN has a market cap of 5.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while RVR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas RVR.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RVR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is more volatile compared to RVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.
BCE-PY.TO vs ADMT.CN Comparison
BCE-PY.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCE-PY.TO stands at 15.30B. In comparison, ADMT.CN has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, BCE-PY.TO is priced at $16.60, while ADMT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCE-PY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.12, whereas ADMT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BCE-PY.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADMT.CN's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BCE-PY.TO is more volatile compared to ADMT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCE-PY.TO.