BAIC Motor Corporation Limited
BAIC Motor Corporation Limited (BCCMY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCCMY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCMY | $2.35 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -18.08 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| GELYY | $50.79 | +1.60% | 515B | 12.18 | $4.17 | +1.65% |
| TOYOF | $23.92 | +0.08% | 311.7B | 12.86 | $1.86 | +2.67% |
| BYDDF | $12.80 | +1.27% | 120.9B | 64.15 | $0.20 | +1.44% |
| BYDDY | $12.80 | +1.43% | 115.2B | 63.95 | $0.20 | +1.44% |
| MBGAF | $69.36 | -0.07% | 66.9B | 9.04 | $7.69 | +7.01% |
| MBGYY | $17.27 | +0.82% | 66.6B | 9.01 | $1.92 | +6.89% |
| BAMXF | $106.39 | +3.29% | 65.3B | 7.87 | $13.51 | +4.52% |
| BYMOF | $102.02 | +8.56% | 63.5B | 7.55 | $13.51 | +4.96% |
| VWAGY | $12.03 | +1.69% | 60.3B | 7.56 | $1.59 | +5.92% |
Stock Comparison
BCCMY vs GELYY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 515B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GELYY trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check GELYY's competition here
BCCMY vs TOYOF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 311.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while TOYOF trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check TOYOF's competition here
BCCMY vs BYDDF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 120.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BYDDF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 64.15. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check BYDDF's competition here
BCCMY vs BYDDY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BYDDY trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 63.95. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check BYDDY's competition here
BCCMY vs MBGAF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while MBGAF trades at $69.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check MBGAF's competition here
BCCMY vs MBGYY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while MBGYY trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check MBGYY's competition here
BCCMY vs BAMXF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BAMXF trades at $106.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and BAMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMXF's competition here
BCCMY vs BYMOF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BYMOF trades at $102.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and BYMOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYMOF's competition here
BCCMY vs VWAGY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while VWAGY trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check VWAGY's competition here
BCCMY vs VWAPY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while VWAPY trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check VWAPY's competition here
BCCMY vs VLKAF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while VLKAF trades at $118.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check VLKAF's competition here
BCCMY vs VLKPF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while VLKPF trades at $116.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and VLKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLKPF's competition here
BCCMY vs MAHMF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while MAHMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and MAHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAHMF's competition here
BCCMY vs DRPRY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while DRPRY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check DRPRY's competition here
BCCMY vs DRPRF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while DRPRF trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and DRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRPRF's competition here
BCCMY vs HNDAF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while HNDAF trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and HNDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNDAF's competition here
BCCMY vs HYMTF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check HYMTF's competition here
BCCMY vs TYIDY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while TYIDY trades at $130.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check TYIDY's competition here
BCCMY vs TYIDF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while TYIDF trades at $125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and TYIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYIDF's competition here
BCCMY vs SZKMF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while SZKMF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check SZKMF's competition here
BCCMY vs SZKMY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while SZKMY trades at $58.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check SZKMY's competition here
BCCMY vs GELYF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GELYF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and GELYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GELYF's competition here
BCCMY vs GELHY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GELHY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GELHY trades at $43.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GELHY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GELHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to GELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check GELHY's competition here
BCCMY vs HYMLF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and HYMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYMLF's competition here
BCCMY vs GWLLF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GWLLF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and GWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLF's competition here
BCCMY vs BMWYY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check BMWYY's competition here
BCCMY vs XPNGF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while XPNGF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and XPNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XPNGF's competition here
BCCMY vs EXXRF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while EXXRF trades at $87.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is -24.75. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check EXXRF's competition here
BCCMY vs GWLLY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GWLLY trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and GWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLY's competition here
BCCMY vs FUJHY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while FUJHY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check FUJHY's competition here
BCCMY vs POAHF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while POAHF trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check POAHF's competition here
BCCMY vs POAHY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while POAHY trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check POAHY's competition here
BCCMY vs YAMHY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check YAMHY's competition here
BCCMY vs FUJHF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while FUJHF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and FUJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUJHF's competition here
BCCMY vs ISUZY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ISUZY trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check ISUZY's competition here
BCCMY vs DNFGF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while DNFGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and DNFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGF's competition here
BCCMY vs RNLSY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while RNLSY trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check RNLSY's competition here
BCCMY vs GNZUF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GNZUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and GNZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNZUF's competition here
BCCMY vs NIOIF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NIOIF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -11.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and NIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIOIF's competition here
BCCMY vs RNSDF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while RNSDF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and RNSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNSDF's competition here
BCCMY vs JCYCF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while JCYCF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and JCYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYCF's competition here
BCCMY vs ISUZF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ISUZF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and ISUZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISUZF's competition here
BCCMY vs JCYGY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while JCYGY trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and JCYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYGY's competition here
BCCMY vs NSANF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NSANF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check NSANF's competition here
BCCMY vs NSANY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NSANY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check NSANY's competition here
BCCMY vs DNFGY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while DNFGY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is -113.28. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and DNFGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGY's competition here
BCCMY vs VLVOF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while VLVOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and VLVOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVOF's competition here
BCCMY vs VLVCY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while VLVCY trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 549.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and VLVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVCY's competition here
BCCMY vs YMHAY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while YMHAY trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and YMHAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMHAY's competition here
BCCMY vs YAMHF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while YAMHF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and YAMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMHF's competition here
BCCMY vs IVCGF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while IVCGF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and IVCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVCGF's competition here
BCCMY vs MZDAY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while MZDAY trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check MZDAY's competition here
BCCMY vs MZDAF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while MZDAF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and MZDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MZDAF's competition here
BCCMY vs YADGF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while YADGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and YADGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YADGF's competition here
BCCMY vs MMTOF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while MMTOF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and MMTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMTOF's competition here
BCCMY vs SMEBF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while SMEBF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and SMEBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMEBF's competition here
BCCMY vs BCAUF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BCAUF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check BCAUF's competition here
BCCMY vs BMCLF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BMCLF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and BMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMCLF's competition here
BCCMY vs HINOY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while HINOY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HINOY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and HINOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOY's competition here
BCCMY vs NFYEF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NFYEF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check NFYEF's competition here
BCCMY vs HINOF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while HINOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HINOF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and HINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOF's competition here
BCCMY vs FOVSY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 936.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while FOVSY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and FOVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOVSY's competition here
BCCMY vs NSNHF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NSNHF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and NSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSNHF's competition here
BCCMY vs ELMWQ Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and ELMWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMWQ's competition here
BCCMY vs AMGDF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 819.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while AMGDF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and AMGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMGDF's competition here
BCCMY vs ARGGY Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 769.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ARGGY trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check ARGGY's competition here
BCCMY vs PIAGF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while PIAGF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and PIAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIAGF's competition here
BCCMY vs KRSOF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and KRSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRSOF's competition here
BCCMY vs RIDEQ Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check RIDEQ's competition here
BCCMY vs NRDE Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NRDE trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and NRDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRDE's competition here
BCCMY vs FHYDF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while FHYDF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check FHYDF's competition here
BCCMY vs LFEV Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while LFEV trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check LFEV's competition here
BCCMY vs ELMSQ Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check ELMSQ's competition here
BCCMY vs SEVCF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while SEVCF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check SEVCF's competition here
BCCMY vs CSBI Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while CSBI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and CSBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSBI's competition here
BCCMY vs EVTGF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check EVTGF's competition here
BCCMY vs FSRNQ Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check FSRNQ's competition here
BCCMY vs ELCR Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and ELCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELCR's competition here
BCCMY vs TUGAF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 495.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and TUGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUGAF's competition here
BCCMY vs GKIT Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 494.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GKIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and GKIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GKIT's competition here
BCCMY vs RONN Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 397.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RONN's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check RONN's competition here
BCCMY vs BINI Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BINI has a market cap of 307.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while BINI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas BINI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BINI's ROE of +5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to BINI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check BINI's competition here
BCCMY vs ELEK Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 306K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ELEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check ELEK's competition here
BCCMY vs GACR Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and GACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GACR's competition here
BCCMY vs EGOXF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EGOXF has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while EGOXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas EGOXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EGOXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and EGOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGOXF's competition here
BCCMY vs ELIO Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and ELIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIO's competition here
BCCMY vs ARVLF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and ARVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARVLF's competition here
BCCMY vs NDVR Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and NDVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVR's competition here
BCCMY vs NVYAF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 869. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY and NVYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYAF's competition here
BCCMY vs DDAIF Comparison February 2026
BCCMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCMY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCCMY is priced at $2.35, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCMY currently has a P/E ratio of -18.08, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, BCCMY's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCCMY is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCMY.Check DDAIF's competition here