BlackBerry Limited

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$37.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check MSFT.NE's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while PANW.NE trades at CA$20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 99.29. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check PANW.NE's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check NVEI.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check TIXT.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check CPLF.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 819.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while CVO.TO trades at CA$8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -44.05. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check CVO.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 726M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while DND.TO trades at CA$10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check DND.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 262.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while STC.TO trades at CA$7.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check STC.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 252.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while TC.TO trades at CA$22.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check TC.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check PAY.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check GIVX.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while HAI.TO trades at CA$4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is -118.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check HAI.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check RAIL.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check NC.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check MOGO.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check BVCI.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check SCPE.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check PACT.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check HANK.V's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check EONX.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while ICS.CN trades at CA$0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check ICS.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check CYBT.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check IP.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +52.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check NFTX.NE's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check VPN.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check PKK.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check PERK.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check OPT.TO's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check SCYB.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check MBLM.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check DSAI.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check HRO.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check APP.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check BYND.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check AMPD.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.Check SQID.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BB.TO has daily volatility of 2.62 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check TAAL.CN's competition here

BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$4.95, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 165.00, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BB.TO has daily volatility of 2.62 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EAP.CN's competition here