BlackBerry Limited
BlackBerry Limited BB.TO Peers
See (BB.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB.TO | CA$5.58 | +2.20% | 3.3B | -558.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$33.75 | +0.66% | 5T | 34.79 | CA$0.97 | +0.95% |
| PANW.NE | CA$23.89 | +1.75% | 178.7B | 113.76 | CA$0.21 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +0.80% |
| TIXT.TO | CA$3.63 | -13.16% | 983.3M | -5.50 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | CA$11.99 | +0.08% | 943.5M | -49.96 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | CA$7.31 | +1.53% | 704.1M | -38.47 | -CA$0.19 | N/A |
| DND.TO | CA$10.23 | -2.57% | 687.5M | -4.19 | -CA$2.44 | +0.74% |
| TC.TO | CA$26.78 | +2.02% | 296.1M | -2.17 | -CA$12.33 | N/A |
| STC.TO | CA$7.74 | +1.42% | 259.3M | -26.69 | -CA$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BB.TO vs MSFT.NE Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs PANW.NE Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while PANW.NE trades at CA$23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 113.76. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs NVEI.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs TIXT.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs CPLF.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs CVO.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 704.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while CVO.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -38.47. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs DND.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 687.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while DND.TO trades at CA$10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs TC.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 296.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while TC.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs STC.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while STC.TO trades at CA$7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -26.69. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs PAY.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs GIVX.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs HAI.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while HAI.TO trades at CA$4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs RAIL.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs NC.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs MOGO.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs SCPE.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs PACT.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs ICS.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while ICS.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs HANK.V Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs CYBT.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs IP.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs NFTX.NE Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +52.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs VPN.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs EONX.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs PKK.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs PERK.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs OPT.TO Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is less volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs MBLM.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs SCYB.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs BVCI.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs DSAI.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs HRO.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs APP.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs BYND.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs AMPD.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs SQID.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BB.TO is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BB.TO.
BB.TO vs TAAL.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BB.TO has daily volatility of 4.28 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
BB.TO vs EAP.CN Comparison
BB.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BB.TO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BB.TO is priced at CA$5.58, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -558.00, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, BB.TO's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BB.TO has daily volatility of 4.28 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.